Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Reporting results of diagnostic NGS-based testing – user-centered redesign of the clinical report

Oleg Agafonov, Sigrun Vik, Kaja O. Kjølås, Sharmini Alagaratnam
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.15.20197236
Oleg Agafonov
1DNV, 1363, Høvik, Norway
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: oleg.agafonov{at}dnv.com
Sigrun Vik
2EGGS Design, Møllergata 4, 0179, Oslo, Norway
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kaja O. Kjølås
2EGGS Design, Møllergata 4, 0179, Oslo, Norway
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sharmini Alagaratnam
1DNV, 1363, Høvik, Norway
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

1 Abstract

The transition of next-generation sequencing (NGS) from the research environment to clinical diagnostics has proven difficult, with exome and whole genome sequencing at various stages of implementation in Nordic hospitals. The clinical genomics report details key findings from the interpretation of NGS data and represents the core hand-off between specialized clinical genomics laboratories and the broader healthcare community. However, these text-heavy reports can be difficult to read: critical information may be scattered around the report, and vital information such as limitations of the test may not always be present. Misunderstanding of results, limitations or key findings can lead to incorrect therapeutic decisions, directly impacting patient management.

We applied the principles of user-centred design to redesign clinical reports to respond to user needs, while also incorporating existing recommendations and guidelines. We performed several rounds of needs gathering, first with producers of clinical genetics reports, then with clinicians with various level of experience in genetic testing. Based on the insights from a workshop and interviews, we created prototypes of reports which were evaluated in comparison to a set of simulated reports representing those currently in clinical production. Our results showed that the majority of evaluators found the redesigned reports to be clearer and easier to process, demonstrating the value of this approach.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Clinical Trial

Not applicable

Funding Statement

The research was conducted with the support of Design and Architecture Norway, grant number 295393.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

According to local ethics oversight body, Norwegian Regional Committees for Medical and Health Research this study is exempt from approval requirement by Norwegian law, such approval is required only when human biological material, health data or human subjects are under investigation. In this study, we a investigated the process of clinical reporting and it does not include any health or personal data.

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

No supplementary data is available

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted March 24, 2021.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Reporting results of diagnostic NGS-based testing – user-centered redesign of the clinical report
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Reporting results of diagnostic NGS-based testing – user-centered redesign of the clinical report
Oleg Agafonov, Sigrun Vik, Kaja O. Kjølås, Sharmini Alagaratnam
medRxiv 2021.03.15.20197236; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.15.20197236
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Reporting results of diagnostic NGS-based testing – user-centered redesign of the clinical report
Oleg Agafonov, Sigrun Vik, Kaja O. Kjølås, Sharmini Alagaratnam
medRxiv 2021.03.15.20197236; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.15.20197236

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)