Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Comparative of the Effectiveness of Different Objective Method for Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block Success; Which One of Them is A Reliable and Early Indicator?

View ORCID ProfileAbdulhakim Şengel, Mahmut Alp Karahan, Nuray Altay, Orhan Binici, Veli Fahri Pehlivan, Ahmet Atlas
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.26.21259567
Abdulhakim Şengel
1Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Siverek State Hospital, Siverek/Sanlıurfa, Turkey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Abdulhakim Şengel
  • For correspondence: ahsengel121{at}gmail.com
Mahmut Alp Karahan
2Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Harran University Medical Faculty, Sanliurfa, Turkey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nuray Altay
2Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Harran University Medical Faculty, Sanliurfa, Turkey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Orhan Binici
2Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Harran University Medical Faculty, Sanliurfa, Turkey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Veli Fahri Pehlivan
2Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Harran University Medical Faculty, Sanliurfa, Turkey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ahmet Atlas
2Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Harran University Medical Faculty, Sanliurfa, Turkey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND Traditional methods that evaluate the success of peripheral nerve block have been replaced by methods that allow objective evaluations over time. Multiple objective techniques for peripheral nerve block have been discussed in the literature.

OBJECTIVE This study aims to investigate whether perfusion index (PI), non-invasive tissue hemoglobin monitoring (SpHb), tissue oxygen saturation (StO2), tissue hemoglobin index (THI) and body temperature are reliable and objective methods to evaluate the adequacy of infraclavicular blockage.

DESIGN A prospective observational study.

SETTING Single center, Department of Anesthesiology, Harran University Medical Faculty, Turkey, from February 2019 to December 2019.

PATIENTS A total of 100 patients scheduled to undergo forearm surgery.

INTERVENTION Ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block (ICB) in 100 patients undergoing forearm surgery.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES PI, SpHb, StO2, THI and Body Temperature measurements were recorded 5 min before the block procedure, right after the procedure, and until the 25th minute after the procedure at 5-min intervals. These values were compared between the blocked limbs and non-blocked limbs while being statistically compared between the successful and failed block groups.

RESULTS Although there were significant differences between the groups of blocked extremity and non-blocked extremity in terms of StO2 (P = 0.001), THI (P = 0.001), PI (P = 0.001) and body temperature (P = 0.001), there was no significant difference between these groups in terms of SpHb (P > 0.05). Moreover, a significant difference was detected between the groups of successful block and failed block in terms of StO2 (P = 0.002), PI (P = 0.002) and body temperature (P = 0.005), while there was no significant difference between these groups in terms of THI (P > 0.05) and SpHb (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION StO2, PI and body temperature measurements are the simple, objective, noninvasive techniques to be used to evaluate success of block procedures. According to The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, StO2 is the specific parameter with the highest sensitivity among these parameters.

TRIAL REGISTRATION ACTRN12621000588897

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Clinical Trial

ACTRN12621000588897

Funding Statement

This study was supported by the Harran University scientific research projects coordination unit with no. 19094.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The name of the Ethics Committee: Ethics Committee of Harran University Faculty of Medicine ID for ethics approva: On February 14, 2019, with the decision of the ethics committee numbered 19.01.07.

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest

  • Funding: This study was supported by the Harran University scientific research projects coordination unit with no. 19094.

Data Availability

Our data were obtained from some patients who underwent upper extremity surgery in the Orthopedics Service of Harran University Medical Faculty Hospital between 01/02/2019 and 01/12/2019, with the decision of the Harran University Ethics Committee. Data It can be obtained from Abdulhakim Şengel (ORCID: 0000-0003-0905-1018).

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted June 30, 2021.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparative of the Effectiveness of Different Objective Method for Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block Success; Which One of Them is A Reliable and Early Indicator?
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Comparative of the Effectiveness of Different Objective Method for Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block Success; Which One of Them is A Reliable and Early Indicator?
Abdulhakim Şengel, Mahmut Alp Karahan, Nuray Altay, Orhan Binici, Veli Fahri Pehlivan, Ahmet Atlas
medRxiv 2021.06.26.21259567; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.26.21259567
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Comparative of the Effectiveness of Different Objective Method for Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block Success; Which One of Them is A Reliable and Early Indicator?
Abdulhakim Şengel, Mahmut Alp Karahan, Nuray Altay, Orhan Binici, Veli Fahri Pehlivan, Ahmet Atlas
medRxiv 2021.06.26.21259567; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.26.21259567

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Anesthesia
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)