Abstract
Objective Characterize psoriatic arthritis (PsA) heterogeneity and develop a conceptual framework to model the clinical and economic value of treatments on key PsA disease domains.
Methods We performed a narrative literature review to identify the key PsA disease domains and outcome measures for these and explore the existing evidence base of clinical and economic evaluations of current PsA treatments on key disease domains. We propose an economic modelling framework that could estimate the economic value of PsA treatments on disease domains.
Results Our literature review identified the following key PsA disease domains: peripheral arthritis, dactylitis, enthesitis, psoriatic spondylitis, skin, and nail lesions, and associated key outcome measures. Our review of the literature, including clinical guidelines, suggests that the evidence base of specific treatment performance on modulating outcomes for a given domain was not strong. We propose an economic modelling framework to estimate the economic value of treatments for addressing specific PsA disease domains. Given existing evidence gaps, we would recommend a cohort-level model with a lifetime horizon, to estimate total social value as well as the cost per outcome and change in cost per symptom avoided. The significant patient heterogeneity in PsA would suggest an individual/patient-level simulation but is likely not feasible with existing data.
Conclusions PsA is a heterogeneous disease, with a number of key disease domains and variable presentation. A better understanding of the performance of treatments on given disease domains would help support patients, providers, payers, HTA’s, and health care policy makers in making personalized treatment decisions.
Key messages
Psoriatic arthritis is a heterogeneous disease, with patients presenting a variety of disease manifestations.
Better understanding of the interaction between manifestations and treatments could help inform patient and physician decision making.
The proposed model framework would help inform value-based, personalized treatment decisions in PsA.
Competing Interest Statement
Jacquelyn W. Chou is an employee PRECISIONheor, a health economics consultancy providing services to the life science industry. Ms. Chou owns stock in Precision Medicine Group, the parent company of PRECISIONheor. Ervant Maksabedian and David Collier are employees of Amgen and own stock/stock options in Amgen. Howard Thom is a consultant to PRECISIONheor.
Funding Statement
Funding for this study was provided by Amgen.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Because the study collected only published and publicly available secondary data and did not involve the collection, use, or transmittal of individually identifiable data, institutional review board approval to conduct this study was not necessary.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Qualified researchers may request data from Amgen clinical studies. Complete details are available at the following: http://www.amgen.com/datasharing.
