Abstract
Purpose This study aims to develop a machine learning based questionnaire (BASH-GN) to classify obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) risk by considering risk factor subtypes.
Methods A total of 4,527 participants that met study inclusion criteria were selected from Sleep Heart Health Study Visit 1 (SHHS 1) database. Another 1,120 records from Wisconsin Sleep Cohort (WSC) served as an independent test data set. Participants with an apnea hypopnea index (AHI) ≥ 15/h were considered as high OSA risk. Potential risk factors were ranked using mutual information between each factor and the AHI, and only the top 50% were selected. We classified the subjects into 2 different groups, low- and high phenotype groups, according to their risk scores. We then developed the BASH-GN, a machine learning based questionnaire that consists of two logistic regression classifiers for the 2 different subtypes of OSA risk prediction.
Results We evaluated the BASH-GN on the SHHS 1 test set (n = 1237) and WSC set (n = 1120) and compared its performance with four commonly used OSA screening questionnaires, the Four-Variable, Epworth Sleepiness Scale, Berlin, and STOP-BANG. The model outperformed these questionnaires on both test sets regarding the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) and the area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC). The model achieved AUROC (SHHS 1: 0.78, WSC: 0.76) and AUPRC (SHHS 1: 0.72, WSC: 0.74), respectively. The questionnaire is available at: https://c2ship.org/bash-gn
Conclusion Considering OSA subtypes when evaluating OSA risk can improve the accuracy of OSA screening.
Competing Interest Statement
Dr. Quan is a consultant from Bryte Bed, Whispersom, DR Capital and Best Doctors.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by National Science Foundation (#2052528) and National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (#R21HL159661-01).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Approval was received to use the data in the present work. Institutional Review Board of the University of Wisconsin Health Sciences gave ethical approval for the collection of the original WSC data. Institutional review boards of New York University, University of Minnesota, Johns Hopkins University, University of Arizona, University of Washington, Boston University, Case Western Reserve University, and University of California Davis gave ethical approval for the collection of the original SHHS data.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data are available online at https://sleepdata.org
