Abstract
Objective Vision impairment represents a growing burden to society and training protocols related to low vision rehabilitation (vision rehab) vary across ophthalmology residency programs. We surveyed practicing ophthalmologists regarding their vision rehab knowledge, confidence levels, and referral thresholds. We categorized subjects and compared response patterns between groups.
Design Prospective observational
Subjects 185 practicing ophthalmologists
Methods We created an Ophthalmology Low Vision Questionnaire and administered it to all enrolled subjects via email. We categorized subjects based on duration of practice, subspecialty area, and exposure to vision rehab during residency training. We drew conclusions by comparing responses between various subject categories.
Main Outcome Measures The primary outcome measure was comparison of confidence levels and thresholds for vision rehab referral across groups. We used statistical tests to look for associations between practice duration, subspecialty area, vision rehab exposure during residency, and referral patterns.
Results Ophthalmologists practicing for 6 or less years were more likely to have had a formal vision rehab rotation during their residency training compared to ophthalmologists practicing for 7 or more years (P = 0.03). Ophthalmologists who completed a formal vision rehab rotation during residency reported greater confidence in their ability to appropriately identify patients who could benefit from vision rehab referral (P = 0.04) and referred patients at earlier visual acuity thresholds (P = 0.04). Clinical subspecialty did not have a significant effect on vision rehab referral confidence or thresholds.
Conclusions Vision rehab rotations during residency lead to improved referral confidence and earlier referral for these vital services. Standardization of vision rehab exposure across ophthalmology residency programs can help to improve outcomes for visually impaired patients.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The study was supported in part by Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc., New York, New York (unrestricted grant to the Vanderbilt Eye Institute). The sponsor or funding organization had no role in the design or conduct of this research. A.J.K. was supported by NIGMS of the National Institutes of Health under award number T32GM007347. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Vanderbilt University and was approved with consent exemption.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon request.
