Abstract
Background Pregnancy preparation, to establish a healthy lifestyle within the preconception period, has been shown to reduce adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Despite its importance, we know very little about if and how people prepare for pregnancy in the UK.
Methods As part of the P3 study, women in the UK were invited to complete an online survey about pregnancy preferences, including the Desire to Avoid Pregnancy (DAP) Scale. 274 participants were currently trying, thinking, or maybe thinking about getting pregnant and were asked about pregnancy preparations. The changes that women, and their partners, made in preparation for pregnancy, reasons for not preparing, and associations with sociodemographics were investigated in univariate and multivariate analyses.
Results Of the 274 women, less than half (n=134, 49%) reported making any changes in preparation for pregnancy, with the most common changes being “eating healthier” (55%) and “folicacid” (54%). The main reason for not preparing was “only thinking about getting pregnant” (38%). 92 women answered questions about partner preparations; only 24% of partners were preparing, with the most common changes being “eating healthier” (64%) and “reducing alcohol” (50%). The main reason for partners not preparing was “already healthy” (51%). DAP score was the only significant factor affecting pregnancy preparation; every one- point increase in DAP score reduced the odds of a woman preparing for pregnancy by 78% (OR 0.22, 95%CI 0.15-0.34).
Conclusion Interventions addressing pregnancy preparation for women, and their partners, are needed. These strategies should target women thinking about pregnancy, to ensure the full benefits of preconception care are received.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The study was funded by an NIHR Advanced Fellowship held by JH (PDF-2017-10-021).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Research Ethics Committee of University College London gave ethical approval for this work (ref 3974.003).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced are available online at the UCL Research Data Repository.
