Abstract
Objective To establish the rate of bleeding disorders amongst women with confirmed endometriosis and clarify predictive features on history.
Methods Eight-two women with confirmed diagnosis of endometriosis were recruited from a tertiary womens’ hospital. General bleeding tendency was evaluated with a modified internationally standardised questionnaire, and a bleeding score was calculated. Menstrual loss was evaluated by obtaining current and heaviest-ever menses profile using Pictorial Blood loss Assessment Chart(PBAC). Forty-one women satisfied criteria for a significant bleeding tendency and underwent coagulation tests including Prothrombin time(PT), activated partial thromboplastin time(aPTT), Platelet Function Analyser-100(PFA-100) and von Willebrand factor(vWF)/Factor VIII(FVIII) studies.
Results The prevalence of abnormal screening haemostasis tests for the population was 17.72% (95% CI 10.04-27.94) for all tests, 8.54%(95% CI 3.50-16.80) for vWF tests, and 12.99%(95% CI 6.41-22.59) for PFA-100. Receiver Operator Characteristic curve analysis demonstrated a ‘very good’ performance of the bleeding score as a diagnostic test for haemostatic abnormalities for nulliparous women with endometriosis. Bleeding symptoms individually were not predictive. Logistic regression suggested the combination of mittleschmerz, cutaneous bleeding symptoms, heavy menstrual bleeding and prolonged bleeding from minor wounds as predictive for haemostatic abnormalities (p=0.0197).
Conclusion The prevalence of abnormal bleeding tests in women with endometriosis on preliminary testing was higher than the population rate of bleeding abnormalities and thus people with histologically proven endometriosis warrant a higher index of suspicion with respect to testing for mild bleeding disorders.
Bleeding disorders in women with endometriosis
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was received funding from the Australasian Gynaecology Endoscopy society to undertake the laboratory testing of the blood specimens
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Mercy Hospital for Women Human research and Ethics committee
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Funding sources: University of Melbourne, Advanced Medical Science program; Australian Gynaecology Endoscopy and Surgery Society Ltd; Siemens: provision of the PFA-100 Analyzer machine for this project
Updated/ corrected orcid number
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
