Abstract
Purpose Adults living in residential-aged-care-homes (RACHs) with oropharyngeal dysphagia may not have timely access to instrumental swallowing assessment due to barriers, including the need to travel off-site for assessment. This study describes the feasibility, utility, and acceptability of mobile Flexible-Endoscopic-Swallowing-Assessment (mFEES) in Australian residential-aged-care-homes (RACHs).
Method Residents with dysphagia living in RACHs were assessed using onsite mFEES. Feasibility, utility, and acceptability were measured at institutional, resident, and implementation levels.
Result Healthcare professionals and medical decision makers reported that mFEES facilitated a better understanding of residents’ swallowing function/dysphagia management and was beneficial over off-site services. Self-rated discomfort during mFEES was low and most residents presented with no or minimal anxiety about the procedure. Costs of mobile assessments are documented.
Conclusion mFEES was a safe, well tolerated, and practical service that offered opportunity to enhance person-centered clinical care in older adults living with dysphagia in RACHs.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR): ACTRN12622001369718
Funding Statement
This scoping review was conducted as part of a PhD research program. O.B. is receiving Australian Government Research Training Scholarship funding through the University of Melbourne to participate in this research program. A.V. holds a fellowship from the National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia (no. 1135683). S.C. is supported by a National Health and Medical Council Senior Research Fellowship (SRF, no. APP1136344).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical approval was granted by The University of Melbourne Human Research and Ethics Committee (reference number 021-13387-13943-2, 08/02/21).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.
