Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Metabolic imaging across scales reveals distinct prostate cancer phenotypes

Nikita Sushentsev, Gregory Hamm, Lucy Flint, Daniel Birtles, Aleksandr Zakirov, Jack Richings, Stephanie Ling, Jennifer Y. Tan, Mary A. McLean, Vinay Ayyappan, Ines Horvat Menih, Cara Brodie, Jodi L. Miller, Ian G. Mills, Vincent J. Gnanapragasam, Anne Y. Warren, Simon T. Barry, Richard J.A. Goodwin, Tristan Barrett, Ferdia A. Gallagher
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.09.29.23296228
Nikita Sushentsev
1Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke’s Hospital and University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: ns784{at}medschl.cam.ac.uk
Gregory Hamm
2Imaging and Data Analytics, Clinical Pharmacology & Safety Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lucy Flint
2Imaging and Data Analytics, Clinical Pharmacology & Safety Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel Birtles
2Imaging and Data Analytics, Clinical Pharmacology & Safety Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Aleksandr Zakirov
3Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jack Richings
2Imaging and Data Analytics, Clinical Pharmacology & Safety Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephanie Ling
2Imaging and Data Analytics, Clinical Pharmacology & Safety Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jennifer Y. Tan
2Imaging and Data Analytics, Clinical Pharmacology & Safety Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mary A. McLean
1Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke’s Hospital and University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
4Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vinay Ayyappan
1Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke’s Hospital and University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ines Horvat Menih
1Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke’s Hospital and University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cara Brodie
4Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jodi L. Miller
4Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ian G. Mills
5Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK
6Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
7Centre for Cancer Biomarkers, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
8Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vincent J. Gnanapragasam
9Department of Urology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
10Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
11Cambridge Urology Translational Research and Clinical Trials Office, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anne Y. Warren
12Department of Pathology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Simon T. Barry
13Bioscience, Discovery, Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard J.A. Goodwin
2Imaging and Data Analytics, Clinical Pharmacology & Safety Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tristan Barrett
1Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke’s Hospital and University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ferdia A. Gallagher
1Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke’s Hospital and University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Hyperpolarised magnetic resonance imaging (HP-13C-MRI) has shown promise as a clinical tool for detecting and characterising prostate cancer. Here we have used a range of spatially resolved histological techniques to identify the biological mechanisms underpinning differential [1-13C]lactate labelling between benign and malignant prostate, as well as tumours containing cribriform and non-cribriform Gleason pattern 4 disease. The elevated hyperpolarised [1-13C]lactate signal in prostate cancer compared to the benign prostate is primarily driven by increased tumour epithelial cell density and vascularity, rather than differences in epithelial lactate concentration between tumour and normal. We also demonstrate that tumours of the cribriform subtype may lack [1-13C]lactate labelling, which is explained by their lower epithelial lactate dehydrogenase expression, higher mitochondrial pyruvate carrier density, and increased lipid abundance compared to lactate-rich non-cribriform lesions. These findings highlight the potential of combining spatial metabolic imaging tools across scales to identify novel metabolic phenotypes in prostate cancer.

Competing Interest Statement

GH, LF, DB, JR, SL, JYT, STB, and RJAG are AstraZeneca employees. F.A.G. has research support from GE Healthcare, grants from GlaxoSmithKline, and has consulted for AstraZeneca on behalf of the University of Cambridge. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.

Funding Statement

This study was supported by Prostate Cancer UK (PCUK; Grant PA14-012) and Cancer Research UK (CRUK; Grant C197/A16465), Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, the National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre (NIHR203312), AstraZeneca, the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council Imaging Centre in Cambridge and Manchester, and the Cambridge Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre. N.S. is supported by the Gates Cambridge Trust. V.J.G. acknowledges infrastructure support from the NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre (BRC-1215-20014). A.Y.W. is supported by the Urological Malignancies Programme of the Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre [C9685/A25177] and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre (BRC-1215-20014).

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

All patients provided written consent to participate in the original prospective study (Molecular Imaging and Spectroscopy with Stable Isotopes in Oncology and Neurology - Imaging metabolism in prostate [MISSION-Prostate] protocol), retrospective analysis of which was approved by the institutional review board (National Research Ethics Service Committee East of England, Cambridge South, Research Ethics Committee number 16/EE/0205). To validate the key findings obtained in the HP-13C-MRI cohort by directly measuring tissue metabolite concentrations in fresh-frozen prostatectomy samples, we then retrospectively identified a secondary cohort of treatment-naive surgical patients who had been originally recruited into an ethically approved prospective national study (DIAMOND, National Research Ethics Service Committee East of England, Cambridge South, Research Ethics Committee number 03/018) following the provision of written consent.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • ↵†† These authors jointly supervised the work

Data Availability

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors and subject to appropriate data transfer agreements.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted October 02, 2023.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Metabolic imaging across scales reveals distinct prostate cancer phenotypes
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Metabolic imaging across scales reveals distinct prostate cancer phenotypes
Nikita Sushentsev, Gregory Hamm, Lucy Flint, Daniel Birtles, Aleksandr Zakirov, Jack Richings, Stephanie Ling, Jennifer Y. Tan, Mary A. McLean, Vinay Ayyappan, Ines Horvat Menih, Cara Brodie, Jodi L. Miller, Ian G. Mills, Vincent J. Gnanapragasam, Anne Y. Warren, Simon T. Barry, Richard J.A. Goodwin, Tristan Barrett, Ferdia A. Gallagher
medRxiv 2023.09.29.23296228; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.09.29.23296228
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Metabolic imaging across scales reveals distinct prostate cancer phenotypes
Nikita Sushentsev, Gregory Hamm, Lucy Flint, Daniel Birtles, Aleksandr Zakirov, Jack Richings, Stephanie Ling, Jennifer Y. Tan, Mary A. McLean, Vinay Ayyappan, Ines Horvat Menih, Cara Brodie, Jodi L. Miller, Ian G. Mills, Vincent J. Gnanapragasam, Anne Y. Warren, Simon T. Barry, Richard J.A. Goodwin, Tristan Barrett, Ferdia A. Gallagher
medRxiv 2023.09.29.23296228; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.09.29.23296228

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Radiology and Imaging
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)