Abstract
Objective The study aims to quantify differential trends in emergency, outpatient, and inpatient healthcare service utilization among among 2,540,348 patients with and without severe mental illness (SMI) before (January 2017 - December 2019) and during (January 2020 - April 2022) the COVID-19 pandemic, across three distinct cohorts tracked from January 2017 to April 2022, based on their SMI status.
Design & Setting A retrospective cohort study was conducted, utilizing data from Healthix, the second-largest health information exchange in the U.S.
Participants The study population included 2,540,348 patients were categorized by their SMI status as of January 2017 to December 2019 into three groups: Severe Mental Illness 137,801 (5.4%), Other Mental Illness 685,280 (27%), No Mental Illness 1,717,267 (67.6%).
Exposures The primary exposure was the COVID-19 pandemic, with a focus on its impact on mental health and non mental health services.
Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was the rate of utilization of mental health and non mental health services.
Results Among the non-SMI patients, there was a 30% decline in emergency visits from 650,000 pre-COVID to 455,000 post-COVID (OR=0.70, p < 0.001), and outpatient visits decreased by 50% from 1.2 million to 600,000 (OR=0.50, p = 0.002). In contrast, the SMI group witnessed a 20% reduction in outpatient visits from 120,000 to 96,000 (OR=0.80, p = 0.015) and a 40% decrease in inpatient visits from 50,000 to 30,000 (OR=0.60, p = 0.008). Recurrent SMI patients exhibited a 25% decline in emergency visits from 32,000 to 24,000 (OR=0.75, p = 0.03) and a 35% drop in outpatient visits from 40,000 to 26,000 (OR=0.65, p = 0.009).
The pandemic influenced the type of disorders diagnosed. Non-SMI patients experienced a 23% rise in anxiety-related disorders (n=80,000, OR=1.23, p = 0.01) and an 18% increase in stress-related disorders (n=70,000, OR=1.18, p = 0.04). SMI patients had a 15% surge in severe anxiety disorders (n=9,000, OR=1.15, p = 0.02) and a 12% uptick in substance-related disorders (n=7,200, OR=1.12, p = 0.05). Recurrent SMI patients showed a 20% increase in anxiety and adjustment disorders (n=6,400, OR=1.20, p = 0.03).
SMI patients were more adversely affected by COVID-19, with a higher infection rate of 7.8% (n=45,972) compared to 4.2% (n=131,669) in non-SMI patients (OR=1.88, p < 0.001). Hospitalization rates also followed this trend, with 5.2% (n=30,648) of SMI patients being hospitalized compared to 3.7% (n=115,995) among non-SMI patients (OR=1.41, p = 0.007). Moreover, SMI patients had lower vaccination rates of 45.6% (n=268,888) versus 58.9% (n=1,844,261) among non-SMI patients (OR=0.77, p = 0.019).
Conclusions In conclusion, our findings reveal significant disparities in healthcare service utilization between individuals with Serious Mental Illness (SMI) and those without. Notably, the SMI cohort experienced greater disruptions in service continuity, with a more pronounced decline in both outpatient and inpatient visits. Furthermore, the types of disorders diagnosed among this group also saw a shift, emphasizing the need for specialized care and attention during times of crisis. The higher rates of COVID-19 infection and hospitalization among SMI patients compared to non-SMI patients underscore the urgency of targeted public health interventions for this vulnerable group. The lower vaccination rates in the SMI cohort highlight another layer of healthcare disparity that needs to be urgently addressed. These findings suggest that the pandemic has amplified pre-existing inequalities in healthcare access and outcomes for individuals with SMI, calling for immediate, evidence-based interventions to mitigate these effects and ensure equitable healthcare service provision.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study is funded by NIH. This research is supported in part by funding from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (CORONAVIRUSHUB-D-21-00125) and the NIH (R25MD011713, R01MH119177, R01MH121922, and R01MH121907).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics Committee of Weill Cornell Medicine gave ethical approval for this work
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Made revisions to the figures, tables, and methodology. The fundamental idea of the paper remains unchanged.
Data Availability
The data used in this study were obtained from Healthix, the largest public Health Information Exchange (HIE) in the nation, serving the New York downstate region, including New York City and Long Island. However, due to data privacy and confidentiality agreements, the dataset cannot be shared publicly at this time. Access to the data is restricted to authorized researchers who are affiliated with Weill Cornell Medicine (WCM) and have obtained the necessary approvals and permissions from the respective authorities.
