Abstract
Background Emergency Departments have the potential ability to predict patient wait times and to display this to patients and other stakeholders. Little is known about whether consumers and stakeholders would want this information and how wait time predictions might be used. The aim of this study was to gain perspectives from consumer, referrer and health services personnel regarding the concept of emergency wait time visibility.
Methods In 2019, 103 semi-structured interviews and one focus group were conducted with emergency medicine patients/families, paramedics, well community members and hospital/paramedic administrators. Nine emergency departments and multiple organisations in Victoria, Australia, contributed data. Transcripts were coded and themes are presented.
Results Consumers and paramedics face physical and psychological difficulties when wait times aren’t visible. Consumers believe about a 2-hour wait is tolerable, beyond this most begin to consider alternative strategies for seeking care. Consumers want to see triage to doctor times; paramedics want door to off-stretcher times (for all possible transport destinations); with 47/50 consumers and 30/31 paramedics potentially using this information. Twenty-eight of 50 consumers would use times to inform facility or provider choice, 19/50 want information once in the waiting room. During prolonged waits, 1/52 consumers would consider not seeking care. Visibility of approximate waits would better inform decision-making, improve load-spreading, allow planning and access to basic needs and might reduce anxiety.
Conclusions Consumers and paramedics want wait time information visibility. They would use the information in a variety of ways, both pre-hospital and whilst waiting for care.
Competing Interest Statement
Some authors are emergency physicians or directors, others work in community health (pre-hospital and district nursing). One author is a consumer.
Clinical Trial
ACTRN12619000665134
Funding Statement
The Medical Research Future Fund, via Monash Partners, funded this study. Researchers contributed in-kind donations of time. The Cabrini Institute provided research infrastructure support and the Cabrini Foundation provided the salary for Mel S.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study received Cabrini ethics committee approval (10-13-05-19)
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The data is not available to the public due to confidentiality concerns of the participants.
