Research transparency promotion by surgical journals publishing randomised controlled trials: a survey

N. Lombard; A. Gasmi; L. Sulpice; K. Boudjema; F. Naudet; D. Bergeat

doi:10.1101/19002386

Abstract

Objective To describe the surgical journal position statement on data-sharing policies (primary objective) and to describe the other features of their research transparency promotion.

Methods Only “SURGICAL” journals with an impact factor superior to 2 (Web of Science) were eligible for the study. They were not included if there were no explicit instructions for clinical trial publication in the instructions for authors and if there were no RCT published between January 2016 and January 2019. The primary outcome was the existence of a data-sharing policy in the instructions for authors. Details on research transparency promotion were also collected, namely the existence of a “prospective registration of clinical trials requirement” policy; a “COIs” disclosure requirement and a specific reference to reporting guidelines such as CONSORT for RCT.

Results Among the 87 surgical journals eligible, 82 (94%) were included in the analysis: 67 (77%) had explicit instructions for RCT and of the remaining, 15 (17.2%) had published at least one RCT between 2016-2019. The median impact factor was 2.98 [IQR=2.48-3.77] and in 2016 and 2017, the journals published a median of 11.5 RCT [IQR=5-20.75]. Data-sharing statement instructions (primary outcome) were ICMJE-compliant in four cases (4.88%), weaker in 45.12% (n=37) and inexistent in 50% (n=41) of the journals. As for data-sharing statements, no association was found between journal characteristics and the existence of data-sharing policies (ICMJE-compliant or weaker). A “prospective registration of clinical trials requirement” was associated with ICMJE allusion or affiliation and higher impact factors. Journals with specific RCT instructions in their OIA and journals referenced on the ICMJE website more frequently mandated the use of CONSORT guidelines.

Conclusion Research transparency promotion is still limited in surgical journals. Uniformization of journal requirements vis-à-vis ICMJE guidelines could be a first step forward for research transparency promotion in surgery.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

No funding

Author Declarations

All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Not Applicable

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Not Applicable

Any clinical trials involved have been registered with an ICMJE-approved registry such as ClinicalTrials.gov and the trial ID is included in the manuscript.

Not Applicable

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant Equator, ICMJE or other checklist(s) as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes