Impact of banning smoking in cars with children on exposure to second-hand smoke: a natural experiment in England and Scotland

INTRODUCTION

Exposure to second-hand tobacco smoke is a significant cause of illness in children and particularly affects more disadvantaged groups [1]. Exposure of children to smoking inside cars is especially concerning due to the very high concentrations that accumulate in these enclosed spaces and its association with a greater risk of child smoking uptake [2][3]. Both smoking uptake and levels of child exposure to smoke in cars are socially patterned, and as such serve as mechanisms which sustain health inequality [4][5][6].

One policy response has been to ban smoking in private vehicles with children present. Evaluations of the impact of banning smoking in cars with children are scarce and present a mixed picture [7][8]. A ban on smoking in private vehicles with anyone ≤18 years present came into effect on 1^st October 2015 in England, and on 5^th December 2016 in Scotland. This difference in timing provides a natural experiment to evaluate the impact of the policy.

METHODS

Data for England came from the Smoking, Drinking and Drug Use surveys and for Scotland from the Scottish Health Surveys in 2012, 2014 and 2016 (further details in Online Supplementary Material). We restricted the sample to children aged 13-15, as children aged 11 and 12 years old had exposure reported by caregivers in Scotland, which is likely to lead to under-recording.

Our primary exposure was child-reported regular exposure to smoking inside cars (Table 1). For England, we categorised responses of every day or most days or once or twice a week as “regular exposure.” In Scotland children were asked “Are you regularly exposed to other people’s tobacco smoke in any of these places?” (Responses: yes/no for a range of locations including “cars/vehicles”). We also included data on age, sex and a marker of deprivation, harmonised between years and countries as set out in Table 1.

We used survey-weighted logistic regression to assess changes in exposure over time using differences-in-differences analysis which is commonly used for policy evaluation since it controls for all time-invariant differences between the intervention and comparison populations [9]. We modelled a linear trend for time individually for both Scotland and England individually and a binary variable for 2016 in England as the one post-intervention data point, interacted with time.

We conducted using data from England only (ages 11-15) which make use of more granular exposure data to conduct analyses of ever, monthly, and regular exposure.

RESULTS

There were 15,318 responses in England and 822 in Scotland (Appendix Table 1). Self-reported regular exposure to smoke in cars were 3.4% in 2012, 2.2% in 2014 and 1.3% in 2016 for Scotland and 6.3%, 5.9%, and 1.6% in England (Figure 1).

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 1: Percentages of children reported regular exposure in England and Scotland with and without policy implementation

Implementation of the smoke-free policy in England was associated with a 73% reduction in the percentage of children self-reporting exposure to smoke in cars compared to trends in Scotland (AOR=0.27, 95%CI 0.19-0.41) (Table 2). Children in England were more likely to report exposure than those in Scotland (AOR=2.35, 95%CI 1.28-4.30). Girls were more likely to report exposure than boys (AOR=1.61, 95%CI 1.34-1.93), as were those in the deprived group compared with the rest of the sample (AOR=1.98, 95%CI 1.61-2.43).

Analyses within England only, using the wider age range of 11 to 15 years, identified lower levels of reported exposure after policy implementation than predicted by preceding trends, ranging from AOR 0.75 (95%CI 0.62-0.90 for ever exposure to AOR 0.26 (95%CI 0.18-0.36)) for regular exposure (Appendix Table 2).

DISCUSSION

The main outcome of the study is that child-reported exposure to tobacco smoke in cars fell following the 2015 introduction of the ban in England, a finding made more robust by the comparison with Scotland where the policy was introduced the following year. We also show that this exposure remains more common in children from more deprived groups, which serves as a reminder of the socially patterned risks of smoking. Our findings provide support for introducing this policy in other jurisdictions as part of comprehensive tobacco control strategies. Previous research using data from Canadian provinces enacting such bans found more marked impacts on exposure in provinces with comprehensive strategies including discouraging smoking uptake and encouraging smoking cessation [8]. Recent evidence has also pointed to a role in exposure to smoking in cars in the incidence of asthma, which widens the potential health benefits of such legislation [10].

The ban is an example of the “Protect” element of the MPOWER policy approach to delivering the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control programme to reduce the harms caused by smoking. Importantly, the purpose of the ban is to reduce child exposure to tobacco smoke, for which this study provides evidence, not to drive prosecutions (see, for example, coverage presenting the legislation as a failure due to the low number of arrests https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/car-smoking-ban-massive-flop-10858407 (last visited 21^st August 2019)).

Conclusions

Our results suggest that banning smoking in private vehicles carrying children has been successful in its main aim of reducing their exposure to tobacco smoke. Given children’s known vulnerability to second-hand smoke exposure, the observed reduction is likely to have resulted in improved health.