Correlates of better linear growth among children in sub-Saharan Africa: Cross sectional survey analysis of positive deviants in poor households

Introduction

Childhood malnutrition is a significant public health problem confronting countries across the globe. However, there is evidence that global trends in child malnutrition have improved over the years. For example, it is estimated that childhood stunting (short stature for age), a critical undernutrition metric, decreased from 39·7% in 1990 to 26·7% in 2010 (1). The trend is predicted to reduce to 22% in 2020 (1). Despite global-level progress in the reduction of the problem during the past decades (2), Africa has not seen much improvement. Although there was a decline in stunting trends from 40.5% in 1980 to 35.2% in 2000 (3), the trends stagnated at 40% between 1990 and 2010 (1). The risk factors contributing to the stagnating trends in stunting in Africa are well documented (4-8).

The consequences of stunting on the later life of the child are well known. Indeed, there is strong evidence that stunting can have long-term effects on cognitive development, school achievement, economic productivity in adulthood and maternal reproductive outcomes (9-12). Stunting is also a condition that may be very difficult to reverse (9). Given the negative consequences of stunting on child health outcomes, the international community has paid considerable attention to the problem. For instance, the World Health Assembly Resolution (2012) set a 40% reduction in the number of stunted children under-5 as one of the six global nutrition targets for 2025 (10, 13). The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) (14) also captured this undernutrition metric as a critical developmental target. It suggests the need for substantial investment in nutrition interventions to address childhood stunting, as averting stunting could produce life-long benefits. To achieve this goal, however, a better understanding of the factors that promote child growth is necessary to provide evidence for the design of effective nutrition intervention. The present study is set out to provide this evidence by focusing on factors that promote child growth rather than risk factors of child growth deficiencies.

The evidence further suggests a disproportionate burden of stunting among children in low and middle-income countries, which is attributable to poverty, lack of food and high incidence of infectious diseases among others (3, 10, 15, 16). In sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), several countries are confronted with high prevalence of stunting among children under five years of age (3, 10, 16). The problem is notably more severe among children living in poor households (16-18)--they tend to have the highest prevalence of childhood stunting (16). It is the case because poverty creates conditions that favour poor child growth outcomes and prevents affected populations from obtaining adequate access to prevention and care (16). Despite the health challengings facing children living in poverty, some children are living in the same conditions (positive deviants) or even worse yet have positive growth outcomes comparable to children living in privilege households anywhere in the world (19-22). The questions this paper intends to address is why some children in poor households are growing well, although they are faced with similar adversity as those who are stunted are? What are the possible factors at the individual, household and community levels that help them to have better growth outcomes? Understanding this will help design programmes to promote the growth of children in impoverished households or environments.

The concept of positive deviance (as referenced above) is based on the observation that “in every community, there are certain individuals or groups whose uncommon behaviours and strategies enable them to find better solutions to problems than their peers while having access to the same resources and facing similar or worse challenges”(23, 24). Positive deviance (PD) is founded on the idea that the most appropriate solutions to challenges already exist within a given population(25, 26). PD aims to study the behaviours and characteristics of those who achieve better results on a given health outcome than their peers who reside in the same community (25). The PD approach was used previously to investigate newborn care, child nutrition, safe sexual practices, malaria control, health service delivery and educational outcomes in many settings (27-35). It is a well-established concept and can be explored using a statistical approach, and often quantified as those who do not experience a negative outcome of interest compared to those around them with the same resources (25). Using the PD approach can be useful because it studies the ‘positive’ aspects of an outcome or community instead of the ‘negative’, and can identify potential points of intervention. The positive deviants in the present study are children who live in poor households and yet growing well relative to their counterparts who live in the same environment but are stunted. The main objective of this study is to examine the factors associated with better growth outcomes among children living in poor households. This resource-focused approach moves away from the dominant risk model approach, where the focus is usually on risk factors of child growth deficiencies. Using the PD approach is to help understand the drivers of better child growth and interventions to promote these drivers in poor households effectively.

Methodology

Results

Discussion

The study examined the socio-demographic factors associated with better child growth in poor households in five sub-Saharan African countries. We utilised a positive deviance approach as our analytical lens, whereby children who were growing well though living in poor households were considered positive deviants. The results showed that the effects of socio-demographic factors on child growth vary across countries. Maternal higher years of education had a significant positive effect on better linear growth among children living in poverty in DRC, Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. This finding suggests that maternal education can mitigate the adverse effects of poverty on children’s nutritional status. Thus, education is an essential resource for improving child growth outcomes in the face of adversity. It may be the case because there is substantial evidence on the effect of education on child-caring practices and the utilisation of health services (55-57), both of which are critical for positive child health outcomes (55, 58). The findings in the present study are in line with the literature (57, 59). A study using data from three SSA countries showed that a higher level of maternal education was associated with reduced the odds of child stunting (59). The literature, together with the present study, though using slightly different analytical approaches, demonstrated the importance of education in improving child growth outcomes.

Further, the results showed that in DRC and Ghana, mothers who attended at least four antenatal visits (ANC) have children with better linear growth outcomes. The plausible explanation for the positive effect is that mothers who attend ANC are likely to receive health and nutrition education, which may have a positive impact on their caring practices, with its consequential effect on better child health outcomes. These findings are similar to others by previous researchers. For example, Kuhnt and Vollmer (60) found that having at least four ANC visits was associated with reduced odds of stunting in pre-school children. This finding means that promoting ANC attendance among women can have a beneficial effect not only on the mothers but also their offspring. Therefore, interventions to promote child growth in poor environments should incorporate ANC as a critical intervention package.

Our analysis also illuminated the widely recognised benefits of breastfeeding for improved child health and developmental outcomes (61-63), but only when child-level covariates were not included in the empirical regression models. For instance, in Ghana, Mozambique and DRC, breastfeeding showed a significant positive effect on better child linear growth in the models containing only the socio-demographic factors. However, this significant association disappeared after child-level covariate such as dietary diversity, age and sex were included. This finding may mean that whether breastfeeding will have a positive effect on child growth or not is conditional on the inclusion or otherwise of child-level covariates. Therefore, in examining the effects of socio-demographic factors on child linear growth, it is significant to include child-level covariates to avoid presenting misleading estimates (64). The non-significant positive effect of breastfeeding on child growth has previously been documented (58, 64, 65). Indeed, Marquis and colleagues (64) observed an inverse relationship between breastfeeding and child linear growth. They attributed this inverse relationship to what they termed reverse causality— that is, the breastfeeding did not lead to poor growth, but poor growth and health led to increased breastfeeding.

Surprisingly, in Mozambique, the widely recognised urban advantage in terms of favourable health outcomes was not observed in the present study. The analysis showed that urban place of residence associated negatively with child linear growth in poor households. The reason for this inverse relationship could be attributed to the precarious conditions under which some of the urban poor live in (e.g. slums) (66). In the literature, both negative and positive effects have been found with the urban place of residence and child growth outcomes (66, 67). Some previous studies have observed that urban children are usually taller and heavier (67, 68). However, this may not include those children in poor urban settings, as there is evidence that children in these settings tend to have shorter heights than expected (66). This finding may mean that the so-called urban advantage does not benefit the urban poor in Mozambique.

The strength of our study is the use of large nationally representative samples, thereby providing more robust estimates of observed associations as well as enhancing the generalizability of the findings. The use of multi-country data unmasks differences and highlights commonalities in the effects of the correlates on child growth across countries, which would not have been possible with single country data. Further, the height data used for computing the HAZ indicator were objectively measured, reducing possible misclassification. The novelty of this study is its focus on factors that promote better child growth rather than risks factors for child growth deficiencies. A limitation worth mentioning is the cross-sectional nature of the data, which does not lend itself to the establishments of a causal relationship between the predictor and outcome variables. The conclusions in the paper are, therefore interpreted as mere associations between the predictor variables and the outcome variable. Another limitation is that the use of PD is somewhat limited as we were not able to explore all the potential PD behaviours that may contribute to positive child growth outcomes using quantitative data of this nature. Notwithstanding, PD is a well-established concept and hence makes it possible to explore the approach (PD) using quantitative data.

Conclusions

The study examined the effects of child, maternal, household and community-level socio-demographic factors on better linear growth among children in five SSA countries. The results showed that the effects of socio-demographic factors on child linear growth vary across countries. Maternal education has a positive effect on better growth among children in all countries except Mozambique. Improving maternal education in poor households may have a beneficial effect on child growth outcomes. A higher number of ANC visits has a significant positive effect on better child growth. Interventions to promote linear growth among children living in poverty should incorporate ANC as one of the critical intervention packages.

Competing Interest

The authors have no competing interests to declare.

Funding

This study did not receive funding from any source.

Data Sharing Statement

This study was a re-analysis of existing data that are publicly available from The DHS Program at http://dhsprogram.com/publications/publication-fr221-dhs-final-reports.cfm. Data are accessible free of charge upon registration with the Demographic and Health Survey program (The DHS Program). The registration is done on the DHS website indicated above.

Authors’ Contribution

DAA conceived and designed the study, interpreted the results, wrote the first draft of the manuscript, and contributed to revision of the manuscript. DAA and ZTD analysed the data. ZTD and EWK contributed to study design, data interpretation, and critical revision of the manuscript. All authors take responsibility for any issues that might arise from the publication of this manuscript.