Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Machine learning prediction of motor response after deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease

View ORCID ProfileJ Habets, A Duits, L Sijben, B De Greef, A Mulders, Y Temel, M Kuijf, P Kubben, C Herff, M Janssen
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/19006841
J Habets
1Department of Neurosurgery, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, The Netherlands
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for J Habets
  • For correspondence: j.habets{at}maastrichtuniversity.nl
A Duits
2Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, The Netherlands
MSc, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
L Sijben
3Department of Neurology, Maastricht University Medical Center, The Netherlands
BSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
B De Greef
3Department of Neurology, Maastricht University Medical Center, The Netherlands
4Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), Maastricht University Medical Center, The Netherlands
MSc, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A Mulders
1Department of Neurosurgery, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, The Netherlands
MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Y Temel
1Department of Neurosurgery, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, The Netherlands
5Department of Neurosurgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, The Netherlands
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M Kuijf
3Department of Neurology, Maastricht University Medical Center, The Netherlands
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P Kubben
1Department of Neurosurgery, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, The Netherlands
5Department of Neurosurgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, The Netherlands
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C Herff
1Department of Neurosurgery, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, The Netherlands
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M Janssen
1Department of Neurosurgery, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, The Netherlands
6Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, The Netherlands
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Introduction Despite careful patient selection for subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN DBS), some Parkinson’s disease patients show limited improvement of motor disability. Non-conclusive results from previous prediction studies maintain the need for a simple tool for neurologists that reliably predicts postoperative motor response for individual patients. Establishing such a prediction tool facilitates the clinician to improve patient counselling, expectation management, and postoperative patient satisfaction. Predictive machine learning models can be used to generate individual outcome predictions instead of correlating pre- and postoperative variables on a group level.

Methods We developed a machine learning logistic regression prediction model which generates probabilities for experiencing weak motor response one year after surgery. The model analyses preoperative variables and is trained on 90 patients using a ten-fold cross-validation. We intentionally chose to leave out pre-, intra- and postoperative imaging and neurophysiology data, to ensure the usability in clinical practice.

Weak responders (n = 27) were defined as patients who fail to show clinically relevant improvement on Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) II, III or IV.

Results The model predicts weak responders with an average area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic of 0.88 (standard deviation: 0.14), a true positive rate of 0.85 and a false positive rate of 0.25, and a diagnostic accuracy of 78%. The reported influences of the individual preoperative variables are useful for clinical interpretation of the model, but cannot been interpreted separately regardless of the other variables in the model.

Conclusion The very good diagnostic accuracy of the presented prediction model confirms the utility of machine-learning based motor response prediction one year after STN DBS implantation, based on clinical preoperative variables.

After reproduction and validation in a prospective cohort, this prediction model holds a tremendous potential to be a supportive tool for clinicians during the preoperative counseling.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

Yasin Temel and Pieter Kubben received an unrestricted grant from the Weijerhorst foundation.

Author Declarations

All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

Any clinical trials involved have been registered with an ICMJE-approved registry such as ClinicalTrials.gov and the trial ID is included in the manuscript.

Not Applicable

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant Equator, ICMJE or other checklist(s) as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • Funding sources: Yasin Temel and Pieter Kubben received an unrestricted grant from the Weijerhorst foundation.

  • Abbreviations: BMI: body mass index, H&Y: Hoehn and Yahr scale, LEDD: levodopa equivalent daily dosage, (MDS) UPDRS: (Movement Disorders Society) Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale, MR: magnetic resonance, PD: Parkinson’s disease, QoL: quality of life, STN DBS: subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation, TEED: total electrical energy delivered

Data Availability

Data and analysis scripts are available on reasonable request.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted October 10, 2019.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Machine learning prediction of motor response after deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Machine learning prediction of motor response after deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease
J Habets, A Duits, L Sijben, B De Greef, A Mulders, Y Temel, M Kuijf, P Kubben, C Herff, M Janssen
medRxiv 19006841; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/19006841
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Machine learning prediction of motor response after deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease
J Habets, A Duits, L Sijben, B De Greef, A Mulders, Y Temel, M Kuijf, P Kubben, C Herff, M Janssen
medRxiv 19006841; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/19006841

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Neurology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)