ABSTRACT
Background International travel is an important risk factor for colonization with extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-PE). Antimicrobial use during travel likely amplifies this risk, yet to what extent, and whether it varies by antimicrobial class, has not been established.
Methods We conducted a systematic review that included prospective cohorts reporting both receipt of systemic antimicrobials and acquired ESBL-PE isolated from stool or rectum during international travel. We performed a random effects meta-analysis to estimate odds of acquiring ESBL-PE due to antimicrobials during travel, overall and by antimicrobial class.
Results Fifteen studies were included. The study population was mainly female travellers from high income countries recruited primarily from travel clinics. Participants travelled most frequently to Asia and Africa with 10% reporting antimicrobial use during travel. The combined odds ratio (OR) for ESBL-PE acquisition during travel was 2.37 for antimicrobial use overall (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.69 to 3.33), but there was substantial heterogeneity between studies. Fluoroquinolones were the antibiotic class associated with the highest combined OR of ESBL-PE acquisition, compared to no antimicrobial use (OR 4.68, 95% CI, 2.34 to 9.37).
Conclusions The risk of ESBL-PE colonization during travel is increased substantially with exposure to antimicrobials, especially fluoroquinolones. While a small proportion of colonized individuals will develop a resistant infection, there remains the potential for onward spread among returning travellers. Public health efforts to decrease inappropriate antimicrobial usage during travel are warranted.
Evidence before this study Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) among bacteria that commonly cause human infection is of increasing public health concern. International travel has recently been associated with colonization with Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase Producing-Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-PE), increasing the spread of drug resistance among these important pathogens. We searched Pubmed, Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and the Cochrane Library for prospective cohort studies published between January 2000 and June 2018, reporting on acquisition of ESBL-PE among travellers, which reported on antimicrobial use during travel. 15 studies were included, which were at moderate risk of bias. The pooled odds ratio for acquisition of ESBL-PE during travel was 2.37 among antimicrobial users, compared to non-users (95% CI, 1.69 to 3.33). The magnitude of this association was stronger among travellers reporting fluoroquinolone use (OR 4.68, 95% CI 2.34 to 9.37).
Added value of this study This is the first study to quantify the association between antimicrobial use during travel, overall and by specific antimicrobial class, with ESBL-PE acquisition across broad populations of travellers and destination countries.
Implications of all the available evidence Further study into the mechanisms by which antimicrobials, such as fluoroquinolones, contribute to AMR may identify protective measures. Meanwhile, antimicrobial use during travel for prevention or treatment of mild-to-moderate traveller’s diarrhea should not be recommended routinely. Where indicated, alternatives to fluoroquinolone antimicrobials should be considered.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
No external funding was received by any of the authors for this study.
Author Declarations
All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Not Applicable
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Not Applicable
Any clinical trials involved have been registered with an ICMJE-approved registry such as ClinicalTrials.gov and the trial ID is included in the manuscript.
Not Applicable
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant Equator, ICMJE or other checklist(s) as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
There are no external datasets available for this article. Systematic review and meta-analysis of previously published works are included, only.
