Prevalence of erectile dysfunction patients with diabetes mellitus and its association with body mass index and glycated hemoglobin in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Wondimeneh Shibabaw Shiferaw; Tadesse Yirga Akalu; Yared Asmare Aynalem

doi:10.1101/19011866

Abstract

Background Mortality and morbidity in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) is attributed to both the micro-vascular and macro-vascular complications. Variation among primary studies was seen on the prevalence of erectile dysfunction in Africa. Therefore, this study was aimed to estimate the pooled prevalence of erectile dysfunction patients with diabetes mellitus and its association with body mass index and glycated hemoglobin in Africa.

Methods PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane library, Scopus, Psyinfo, Africa online journal and Google Scholar were searched. A funnel plot and Egger’s regression test were used to see publication bias. I-squared statistic was used to check heterogeneity of studies. DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model was applied to estimate the pooled effect size. The subgroup and Meta regression analysis were conducted by country, sample size, and year of publication. Sensitivity analysis was deployed to see the effect of single study on the overall estimation. STATA version 14 statistical software was used for meta-analysis.

Result A total of 20 studies with 5,177 study participants were included to estimate the pooled prevalence. The pooled prevalence of erectile dysfunction patients with diabetes mellitus was 61.62% (95% CI: 48.35–74.9). BMI ≥ 30kg/m² (AOR = 1.26; 95% CI: 0.73 –2.16), and glycated hemoglobin ≥ 7% (AOR = 0.93; 95% CI: 0.5–5.9), were identified factors though not statistically significant associated with erectile dysfunction.

Conclusions The prevalence of erectile dysfunction in Africa remains high. Therefore, situation based interventions and country context specific preventive strategies could be developed to reduce the magnitude of erectile dysfunction among patients with diabetes mellitus.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

not applicable

Author Declarations

All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.

Yes

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes