Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Comparison of first trimester dating methods for gestational age estimation and their implication on preterm birth classification in a North Indian cohort

Ramya Vijayram, Nikhita Damaraju, Ashley Xavier, Bapu Koundinya Desiraju, Ramachandran Thiruvengadam, Sumit Misra, Shilpa Chopra, Ashok Khurana, Nitya Wadhwa, GARBH-Ini Study Group, Raghunathan Rengaswamy, Himanshu Sinha, Shinjini Bhatnagar
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2019.12.27.19016006
Ramya Vijayram
1Department of Biotechnology, Bhupat and Jyoti Mehta School of Biosciences, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India
2Initiative for Biological Systems Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nikhita Damaraju
1Department of Biotechnology, Bhupat and Jyoti Mehta School of Biosciences, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India
2Initiative for Biological Systems Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ashley Xavier
1Department of Biotechnology, Bhupat and Jyoti Mehta School of Biosciences, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India
2Initiative for Biological Systems Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bapu Koundinya Desiraju
3Maternal and Child Health Program, Translational Health Science and Technology Institute, Faridabad, India
4Interdisciplinary Group for Advanced Research on Birth Outcomes - DBT India Initiative, Translational Health Science and Technology Institute, Faridabad, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ramachandran Thiruvengadam
3Maternal and Child Health Program, Translational Health Science and Technology Institute, Faridabad, India
4Interdisciplinary Group for Advanced Research on Birth Outcomes - DBT India Initiative, Translational Health Science and Technology Institute, Faridabad, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sumit Misra
3Maternal and Child Health Program, Translational Health Science and Technology Institute, Faridabad, India
4Interdisciplinary Group for Advanced Research on Birth Outcomes - DBT India Initiative, Translational Health Science and Technology Institute, Faridabad, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shilpa Chopra
3Maternal and Child Health Program, Translational Health Science and Technology Institute, Faridabad, India
4Interdisciplinary Group for Advanced Research on Birth Outcomes - DBT India Initiative, Translational Health Science and Technology Institute, Faridabad, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ashok Khurana
5The Ultrasound Lab, Defence Colony, New Delhi, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nitya Wadhwa
3Maternal and Child Health Program, Translational Health Science and Technology Institute, Faridabad, India
4Interdisciplinary Group for Advanced Research on Birth Outcomes - DBT India Initiative, Translational Health Science and Technology Institute, Faridabad, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
4Interdisciplinary Group for Advanced Research on Birth Outcomes - DBT India Initiative, Translational Health Science and Technology Institute, Faridabad, India
Raghunathan Rengaswamy
2Initiative for Biological Systems Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India
6Department of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India
7Robert Bosch Centre for Data Science and Artificial Intelligence, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Himanshu Sinha
1Department of Biotechnology, Bhupat and Jyoti Mehta School of Biosciences, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India
2Initiative for Biological Systems Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India
7Robert Bosch Centre for Data Science and Artificial Intelligence, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: shinjini.bhatnagar{at}thsti.res.in sinha{at}iitm.ac.in
Shinjini Bhatnagar
3Maternal and Child Health Program, Translational Health Science and Technology Institute, Faridabad, India
4Interdisciplinary Group for Advanced Research on Birth Outcomes - DBT India Initiative, Translational Health Science and Technology Institute, Faridabad, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: shinjini.bhatnagar{at}thsti.res.in sinha{at}iitm.ac.in
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background Different formulae have been developed globally to estimate gestational age (GA) by ultrasonography in the first trimester of pregnancy. In this study, we develop an Indian population-specific dating formula and compare its performance with published formulae. Finally, we evaluate the implications of the choice of dating method on preterm birth (PTB) rate. This study’s data was from GARBH-Ini, an ongoing pregnancy cohort of North Indian women to study PTB.

Methods Comparisons between ultrasonography-Hadlock and last menstrual period (LMP) based dating methods were made by studying the distribution of their differences by Bland-Altman analysis. Using data-driven approaches, we removed data outliers more efficiently than by applying clinical parameters. We applied advanced machine learning algorithms to identify relevant features for GA estimation and developed an Indian population-specific formula (Garbhini-GA1) for the first trimester. PTB rates of Garbhini-GA1 and other formulae were compared by estimating sensitivity and accuracy.

Results Performance of Garbhini-GA1 formula, a non-linear function of crown-rump length (CRL), was equivalent to published formulae for estimation of first trimester GA (LoA, - 0.46,0.96 weeks). We found that CRL was the most crucial parameter in estimating GA and no other clinical or socioeconomic covariates contributed to GA estimation. The estimated PTB rate across all the formulae including LMP ranged 11.27 – 16.50% with Garbhini-GA1 estimating the least rate with highest sensitivity and accuracy. While the LMP-based method overestimated GA by three days compared to USG-Hadlock formula; at an individual level, these methods had less than 50% agreement in the classification of PTB.

Conclusions An accurate estimation of GA is crucial for the management of PTB. Garbhini-GA1, the first such formula developed in an Indian setting, estimates PTB rates with higher accuracy, especially when compared to commonly used Hadlock formula. Our results reinforce the need to develop population-specific gestational age formulae.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This study was funded by an alumni endowment from Prakash Arunachalam to the Initiative for Biological Systems Engineering, IIT Madras (BIO/18-19/304/ALUM/KARH). GARBH-Ini cohort study is funded by Department of Biotechnology, Government of India (BT/PR9983/MED/97/194/2013) and for some components of the biospecimen and ultrasound repository by the Grand Challenges India-All Children Thriving Program (supported by the Programme Management Unit), Biotechnology Industry Research Assistance Council, Department of Biotechnology, Government of India (BIRAC/GCI/0114/03/14-ACT). The data analysis exercise was supported by the Grand Challenges India- ki' Data Challenge for Maternal and Child Health grant (supported by the Programme Management Unit), Biotechnology Industry Research Assistance Council, Department of Biotechnology, Government of India (BT/kiData0394/06/18).

Author Declarations

All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.

Yes

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • ↵* Ramya Vijayram, Nikhita Damaraju, and Ashley Xavier are joint first authors.

Data Availability

All supplementary data used in the manuscript is submitted. Primary data can be shared according to the GARBH-Ini data sharing policy which available on request.

  • List of Abbreviations

    LMP
    Last Mensural Period
    GA
    Gestational Age
    CRL
    Crown Rump Length
    PTB
    Preterm Birth Rate
    USG
    Ultrasonography
    CI
    Confidence Interval
    GLM
    Generalised Linear Model
    LoA
    Limits of Agreement
    BA
    Bland-Altman
    IQR
    Inter-Quartile Range
    BMI
    Body Mass Index
  • Copyright 
    The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
    Back to top
    PreviousNext
    Posted March 18, 2021.
    Download PDF

    Supplementary Material

    Data/Code
    Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

    NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Comparison of first trimester dating methods for gestational age estimation and their implication on preterm birth classification in a North Indian cohort
    (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Share
    Comparison of first trimester dating methods for gestational age estimation and their implication on preterm birth classification in a North Indian cohort
    Ramya Vijayram, Nikhita Damaraju, Ashley Xavier, Bapu Koundinya Desiraju, Ramachandran Thiruvengadam, Sumit Misra, Shilpa Chopra, Ashok Khurana, Nitya Wadhwa, GARBH-Ini Study Group, Raghunathan Rengaswamy, Himanshu Sinha, Shinjini Bhatnagar
    medRxiv 2019.12.27.19016006; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2019.12.27.19016006
    Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
    Citation Tools
    Comparison of first trimester dating methods for gestational age estimation and their implication on preterm birth classification in a North Indian cohort
    Ramya Vijayram, Nikhita Damaraju, Ashley Xavier, Bapu Koundinya Desiraju, Ramachandran Thiruvengadam, Sumit Misra, Shilpa Chopra, Ashok Khurana, Nitya Wadhwa, GARBH-Ini Study Group, Raghunathan Rengaswamy, Himanshu Sinha, Shinjini Bhatnagar
    medRxiv 2019.12.27.19016006; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2019.12.27.19016006

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    Subject Area

    • Obstetrics and Gynecology
    Subject Areas
    All Articles
    • Addiction Medicine (349)
    • Allergy and Immunology (668)
    • Allergy and Immunology (668)
    • Anesthesia (181)
    • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
    • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
    • Dermatology (223)
    • Emergency Medicine (399)
    • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
    • Epidemiology (12228)
    • Forensic Medicine (10)
    • Gastroenterology (759)
    • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
    • Geriatric Medicine (387)
    • Health Economics (680)
    • Health Informatics (2657)
    • Health Policy (1005)
    • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
    • Hematology (363)
    • HIV/AIDS (851)
    • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
    • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
    • Medical Education (399)
    • Medical Ethics (109)
    • Nephrology (436)
    • Neurology (3882)
    • Nursing (209)
    • Nutrition (577)
    • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
    • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
    • Oncology (2030)
    • Ophthalmology (585)
    • Orthopedics (240)
    • Otolaryngology (306)
    • Pain Medicine (250)
    • Palliative Medicine (75)
    • Pathology (473)
    • Pediatrics (1115)
    • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
    • Primary Care Research (452)
    • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
    • Public and Global Health (6527)
    • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
    • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
    • Respiratory Medicine (871)
    • Rheumatology (409)
    • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
    • Sports Medicine (342)
    • Surgery (448)
    • Toxicology (53)
    • Transplantation (185)
    • Urology (165)