Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Implementation of data access and use procedures in clinical data warehouses. A systematic review of literature and publicly available policies

View ORCID ProfileElena Pavlenko, View ORCID ProfileDaniel Strech, View ORCID ProfileHolger Langhof
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.27.20018861
Elena Pavlenko
1Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health
2QUEST – Center for Transforming Biomedical Research, Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), 10178 Berlin, Germany
3Institute for History, Ethics and Philosophy of Medicine, Hannover Medical School (MHH), Hannover, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Elena Pavlenko
Daniel Strech
1Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health
2QUEST – Center for Transforming Biomedical Research, Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), 10178 Berlin, Germany
3Institute for History, Ethics and Philosophy of Medicine, Hannover Medical School (MHH), Hannover, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Daniel Strech
Holger Langhof
1Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health
2QUEST – Center for Transforming Biomedical Research, Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), 10178 Berlin, Germany
3Institute for History, Ethics and Philosophy of Medicine, Hannover Medical School (MHH), Hannover, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Holger Langhof
  • For correspondence: holger.langhof{at}alumni.charite.de
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background The promises of improved health care and health research through data-intensive applications rely on a growing amount of health data. At the core of large-scale data integration efforts, clinical data warehouses (CDW) are also responsible of data governance, managing data access and (re)use. As the complexity of the data flow increases, greater transparency and standardization of criteria and procedures is required in order to maintain objective oversight and control. This study assessed the spectrum of data access and use criteria and procedures in clinical data warehouses governance internationally.

Methods We performed a systematic review of (a) the published scientific literature on CDW and (b) publicly available information on CDW data access, e.g., data access policies. A qualitative thematic analysis was applied to all included literature and policies.

Results Twenty-three scientific publications and one policy document were included in the final analysis. The qualitative analysis led to a final set of three main thematic categories: (1) requirements, including recipient requirements, reuse requirements, and formal requirements; (2) structures and processes, including review bodies and review values; and (3) access, including access limitations.

Conclusions The description of data access and use governance in the scientific literature is characterized by a high level of heterogeneity and ambiguity. In practice, this might limit the effective data sharing needed to fulfil the high expectations of data-intensive approaches in medical research and health care. The lack of publicly available information on access policies conflicts with ethical requirements linked to principles of transparency and accountability.

CDW should publicly disclose by whom and under which conditions data can be accessed, and provide designated governance structures and policies to increase transparency on data access. The results of this review may contribute to the development of practice-oriented minimal standards for the governance of data access, which could also result in a stronger harmonization, efficiency, and effectiveness of CDW.

Competing Interest Statement

All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare: all authors had financial support from HiGHmed, Medical Informatics Consortium, for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Funding Statement

This study was funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF; HiGHmed, Medical Informatics Consortium, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, 01ZZ1802C).

Author Declarations

All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.

Yes

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

An extensive part of the data analyzed during this study is included in this published article and its supplementary files (Supplement Table 3). The raw dataset analyzed during the current study is not publicly available in full due to copyright restrictions but is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

  • LIST OF ABREVIATIONS

    BMBF
    German Federal Ministry of Education and Research
    CDW
    Clinical data warehouse
    EHR
    Electronic health records
    LHCS
    Learning health care systems
    PRISMA
    Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
    WMA
    World Medical Association
  • Copyright 
    The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
    Back to top
    PreviousNext
    Posted January 28, 2020.
    Download PDF

    Supplementary Material

    Data/Code
    Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

    NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Implementation of data access and use procedures in clinical data warehouses. A systematic review of literature and publicly available policies
    (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Share
    Implementation of data access and use procedures in clinical data warehouses. A systematic review of literature and publicly available policies
    Elena Pavlenko, Daniel Strech, Holger Langhof
    medRxiv 2020.01.27.20018861; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.27.20018861
    Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
    Citation Tools
    Implementation of data access and use procedures in clinical data warehouses. A systematic review of literature and publicly available policies
    Elena Pavlenko, Daniel Strech, Holger Langhof
    medRxiv 2020.01.27.20018861; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.27.20018861

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    Subject Area

    • Health Policy
    Subject Areas
    All Articles
    • Addiction Medicine (349)
    • Allergy and Immunology (668)
    • Allergy and Immunology (668)
    • Anesthesia (181)
    • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
    • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
    • Dermatology (223)
    • Emergency Medicine (399)
    • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
    • Epidemiology (12228)
    • Forensic Medicine (10)
    • Gastroenterology (759)
    • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
    • Geriatric Medicine (387)
    • Health Economics (680)
    • Health Informatics (2657)
    • Health Policy (1005)
    • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
    • Hematology (363)
    • HIV/AIDS (851)
    • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
    • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
    • Medical Education (399)
    • Medical Ethics (109)
    • Nephrology (436)
    • Neurology (3882)
    • Nursing (209)
    • Nutrition (577)
    • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
    • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
    • Oncology (2030)
    • Ophthalmology (585)
    • Orthopedics (240)
    • Otolaryngology (306)
    • Pain Medicine (250)
    • Palliative Medicine (75)
    • Pathology (473)
    • Pediatrics (1115)
    • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
    • Primary Care Research (452)
    • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
    • Public and Global Health (6527)
    • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
    • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
    • Respiratory Medicine (871)
    • Rheumatology (409)
    • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
    • Sports Medicine (342)
    • Surgery (448)
    • Toxicology (53)
    • Transplantation (185)
    • Urology (165)