Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Quantitatively Evaluating the Cross-Sectoral and One Health Impact of Interventions: A Scoping Review and Application to Antibiotic Resistance

Nichola R. Naylor, Jo Lines, Jeff Waage, Barbara Wieland, Gwenan M. Knight
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.30.20019703
Nichola R. Naylor
1London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jo Lines
1London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeff Waage
1London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Barbara Wieland
2International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gwenan M. Knight
1London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Current published guidance on how to evaluate antibiotic resistance (ABR) from a One Health perspective has focussed on the evaluation of intervention design and of the intervention implementation process. For efficient resource allocation, it is also important to consider quantitative measures of intervention impact. In particular, there has been little discussion of how to practically evaluate ABR-related agri- and aquaculture interventions from a public health perspective. Lessons can be learned from other One Health and cross-sectoral intervention impact evaluations.

WebofScience, EconLit, PubMed and grey literature were searched for literature quantitatively evaluating interventions across humans, animals and/or the environment. The review included 90 studies: 73 individual evaluations (from 72 papers) and 18 reviews, all including some measure of human impact, but only 29 papers covered all three One Health perspectives (human, animal and environmental). To provide decision makers with expected outcome estimates that are related to their objective functions, evaluations should provide outcome estimates from different perspectives. These include individual, microeconomic and/or macroeconomic perspectives across the One Health system. Based on the methods found in this review, a multi-level compartmental modelling approach for ABR-related intervention evaluation is proposed. The outcomes of such models can then feed into multi-criteria-decision analyses that weigh respective impact estimates alongside other chosen outcome estimates (for example equity or uncertainty). It is key that future quantitative evaluation models of ABR-related interventions are shared (for example through open source code sharing websites) to avoid duplication of effort and to enable more comprehensive estimates of intervention impact to be modelled in the future.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This research was funded by, and is a contribution to, the CGIAR Research Program on Agriculture for Nutrition and Health (A4NH). We thank all donors and organizations which globally support its work through their contributions to the CGIAR system. The opinions expressed here belong to the authors, and do not necessarily reflect those of A4NH or CGIAR.

Author Declarations

All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.

Yes

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

The data used in this study are in the form of literature data extraction. The data extraction table is available in the supplementary material of this paper.

  • Abbreviations

    ABR
    Antibiotic Resistance
    NEOH
    Network for Evaluation of One Health
    OH
    One Health
  • Copyright 
    The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
    Back to top
    PreviousNext
    Posted February 03, 2020.
    Download PDF

    Supplementary Material

    Data/Code
    Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

    NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Quantitatively Evaluating the Cross-Sectoral and One Health Impact of Interventions: A Scoping Review and Application to Antibiotic Resistance
    (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Share
    Quantitatively Evaluating the Cross-Sectoral and One Health Impact of Interventions: A Scoping Review and Application to Antibiotic Resistance
    Nichola R. Naylor, Jo Lines, Jeff Waage, Barbara Wieland, Gwenan M. Knight
    medRxiv 2020.01.30.20019703; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.30.20019703
    Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
    Citation Tools
    Quantitatively Evaluating the Cross-Sectoral and One Health Impact of Interventions: A Scoping Review and Application to Antibiotic Resistance
    Nichola R. Naylor, Jo Lines, Jeff Waage, Barbara Wieland, Gwenan M. Knight
    medRxiv 2020.01.30.20019703; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.30.20019703

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    Subject Area

    • Health Economics
    Subject Areas
    All Articles
    • Addiction Medicine (349)
    • Allergy and Immunology (668)
    • Allergy and Immunology (668)
    • Anesthesia (181)
    • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
    • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
    • Dermatology (223)
    • Emergency Medicine (399)
    • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
    • Epidemiology (12228)
    • Forensic Medicine (10)
    • Gastroenterology (759)
    • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
    • Geriatric Medicine (387)
    • Health Economics (680)
    • Health Informatics (2657)
    • Health Policy (1005)
    • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
    • Hematology (363)
    • HIV/AIDS (851)
    • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
    • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
    • Medical Education (399)
    • Medical Ethics (109)
    • Nephrology (436)
    • Neurology (3882)
    • Nursing (209)
    • Nutrition (577)
    • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
    • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
    • Oncology (2030)
    • Ophthalmology (585)
    • Orthopedics (240)
    • Otolaryngology (306)
    • Pain Medicine (250)
    • Palliative Medicine (75)
    • Pathology (473)
    • Pediatrics (1115)
    • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
    • Primary Care Research (452)
    • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
    • Public and Global Health (6527)
    • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
    • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
    • Respiratory Medicine (871)
    • Rheumatology (409)
    • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
    • Sports Medicine (342)
    • Surgery (448)
    • Toxicology (53)
    • Transplantation (185)
    • Urology (165)