Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Nasal high-frequency percussive ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in term and preterm neonates exhibiting respiratory distress: a randomized controlled trial (TONIPEP; NCT 02030691)

View ORCID ProfileRenesme Laurent, Dumas de la Roque Eric, Germain Christine, Chevrier Agnès, Rebola Muriel, Cramaregeas Sophie, Benard Antoine, Elleau Christophe, Tandonnet Olivier
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.11.20022178
Renesme Laurent
1CHU Bordeaux, Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Renesme Laurent
  • For correspondence: laurent.renesme{at}gmail.com
Dumas de la Roque Eric
1CHU Bordeaux, Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Germain Christine
2CHU Bordeaux, Pôle de Santé Publique, Clinical Epidemiology Unit, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chevrier Agnès
1CHU Bordeaux, Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rebola Muriel
1CHU Bordeaux, Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cramaregeas Sophie
1CHU Bordeaux, Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Benard Antoine
2CHU Bordeaux, Pôle de Santé Publique, Clinical Epidemiology Unit, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elleau Christophe
1CHU Bordeaux, Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tandonnet Olivier
1CHU Bordeaux, Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Objective To determine whether the use of nasal, high-frequency percussive ventilation (nHFPV) to manage neonatal respiratory distress decreases the regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rScO2) below that afforded by nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP).

Design Monocentric, prospective, randomized, monocentric, open-label, non-inferiority crossover trial.

Patients Newborns of gestational age (GA) ≥ 33 weeks exhibiting persistent respiratory distress after 10 min of life (Silverman score ≥ 4).

Intervention nHFPV and nCPAP, in succession and in random order.

Main outcome measure Mean rScO2, as revealed by near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) performed over the last 5 min of each ventilation mode. To show that nHFPV was not inferior to nCPAP, our a priori calculations required that the lower boundary of the bilateral 95% confidence interval (CI) of the difference between the mean rScO2 values of each ventilation mode should exceed –5.

Results Forty-nine newborns were randomized and 46 were analyzed. The mean (± standard deviation [SD]) GA and birth weight were 36.4 ± 1.9 weeks and 2,718 ± 497 g. The diagnosis was transient tachypnea in 65% of cases and respiratory distress syndrome in 35%. The mean rScO2 difference during the last 5 min of each ventilation mode (nHFPV minus nCPAP) was – 0.7 ± 5.4% (95% CI –2.25; 0.95). Neither a period effect nor a period-treatment interaction was evident. The mean transcutaneous carbon dioxide values (n = 26) for nCPAP and nHFPV were 7.1 ± 4.8 and 7.9 ± 5.1 kPa, respectively. No harmful or unintentional effect was observed.

Conclusion In our study on newborns of GA ≥ 33 weeks treated for respiratory distress, cerebral oxygenation via nHFPV was not inferior to nCPAP.

What is already known on the topic

  • Non-invasive high-frequency ventilation is feasible in preterm newborns and seems to improve ventilation compared to nasal CPAP.

  • We previously showed that nasal high-frequency percussive ventilation (nHFPV) was more efficient that nCPAP for respiratory distress management in newborns of gestational age (GA) ≥ 35 weeks.

  • The impact of mechanical ventilation, especially high-frequency modes, on cerebral blood flow in neonates is of concern.

What this study adds

  • nHFPV was well-tolerated and non-inferior to nasal CPAP as measured by rScO2 levels when used to manage respiratory distress at birth in newborns of GA ≥ 33 weeks.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Clinical Trial

NCT 02030691

Funding Statement

This Study has been founded by the "Appel d'offre interne 2013" grant from the University Hospital Centre of Bordeaux, France.

Author Declarations

All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.

Yes

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data relevant to the study are provided in the manuscript.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted February 13, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Nasal high-frequency percussive ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in term and preterm neonates exhibiting respiratory distress: a randomized controlled trial (TONIPEP; NCT 02030691)
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Nasal high-frequency percussive ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in term and preterm neonates exhibiting respiratory distress: a randomized controlled trial (TONIPEP; NCT 02030691)
Renesme Laurent, Dumas de la Roque Eric, Germain Christine, Chevrier Agnès, Rebola Muriel, Cramaregeas Sophie, Benard Antoine, Elleau Christophe, Tandonnet Olivier
medRxiv 2020.02.11.20022178; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.11.20022178
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Nasal high-frequency percussive ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in term and preterm neonates exhibiting respiratory distress: a randomized controlled trial (TONIPEP; NCT 02030691)
Renesme Laurent, Dumas de la Roque Eric, Germain Christine, Chevrier Agnès, Rebola Muriel, Cramaregeas Sophie, Benard Antoine, Elleau Christophe, Tandonnet Olivier
medRxiv 2020.02.11.20022178; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.11.20022178

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Pediatrics
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)