ABSTRACT
Introduction Weight estimation of both adult and paediatric patients is often necessary in emergency or low-resource settings when it is not possible to weigh the patient. There are many methods for paediatric weight estimation, but no standard methods for adults. PAWPER and Mercy tapes are used in children, but have not been assessed in adults. The primary aim of this study was to assess weight estimation methods in patients of all ages.
Methods Patients were prospectively recruited from emergency and out-patient departments. Subjects (or guardians) were asked to estimate weight. Investigators collected weight, height, mid-arm circumference (MAC) and humeral-length data. In all subjects, estimates of weight were calculated from height and MAC (PAWPER tapes), MAC and humeral-length (Mercy tape). In children, Broselow tape and age-based formulae were also used. Primary outcome measures were proportions of estimates within 10%, 20% and 30% of actual weight (p10, p20, p30).
Results 947 subjects were recruited: 307 children, 309 adolescents and 331 adults. For p20, the best methods were: in children, guardian estimate (90.2%) and PAWPER XL-MAC (89.3%); in adolescents, PAWPER XL-MAC (91.3%) and guardian estimate (90.9%); in adults, subject estimate (98.5%) and PAWPER XL-MAC (83.7%).
Conclusion This is the first prospective study of weight estimation methods in Rwanda, and the first adult study of PAWPER and Mercy tapes. In children, age-based rules performed poorly. In patients of all ages, the PAWPER XL-MAC and guardian/subject estimates of weight were the most reliable and we would recommend their use in this setting.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
We are grateful for the grant of £1381 we received from the Royal College of Emergency Medicine Research Grants for Low Income Countries Award Scheme, part of which funded this study.
Author Declarations
All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.
Yes
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Deidentified Excel/Medcalc datasets are available on request from the author (ORCID ID 0000-0002-8910-2307).
