Abstract
Objectives Opportunities for older adults to do physical activity may depend on other commitments. To see if reported physical activity was higher or lower among older adults depending on work status: full time, part-time or retired.
Methods The Active Lives Survey 2016/17 in England was used to see how active people were depending on employment or retirement status. Types of physical activity (PA) considered were: leisure, gardening, active travel and combined total, adjusted for age, sex, BMI, disability, rurality and deprivation in models using hurdle negative binomial regression.
Results Total PA was significantly greater for retired persons compared to both full- and part-time workers age 55-64, while being retired or working part-time at age 65-74 meant more PA. People did more leisure or gardening with less work, but active travel decreased with fewer work hours, at all ages. Retirement meant more leisure and gardening PA but less active travel.
Conclusions Demand for opportunities to engage in leisure and gardening PA appears to be high among retired people. Greater promotion of active travel in this cohort may be possible.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by a grant from Sport England. The funder had no role in analysis, interpretation or decision to publish.
Author Declarations
All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.
Yes
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Compliance with Ethical Standards We have no conflict of interest. Funding is stated below. Ethical approval was not required as consent was implied with original survey data collection (to improve services). This research did not involve animals.
Data Availability
We do not have authority to share the original data which are owned by Sport England. There is an aspiration to put these data on UK Data Archive in future.
