ABSTRACT
Background Hyposmia, motor impairment and probable REM-sleep behaviour disorder (RBD) are markers for Parkinson’s disease (PD). Proposed PD risk prediction models have dichotomised test results and applied likelihood ratios (LRs) to scores above and below cut-offs. We investigate whether LRs for specific test values could enhance prediction models.
Methods Smell and probable RBD data for PD patients were taken from the Tracking Parkinson’s study (n=1046). For motor impairment previously published data were supplemented (n=87). PREDICT-PD pilot study participants were the controls. Smell, motor impairment and RBD were assessed using the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT), the Bradykinesia-Akinesia Incoordination (BRAIN) test and the REM sleep behaviour disorder Screening Questionnaire (RBDSQ). UPSIT and RBDSQ data were analysed using logistic regression to determine which items were predictive of PD, or using total scores. Gaussian distributions were fitted to BRAIN test scores. LRs were calculated from logistic regression models or from score distributions. False-positive rates (FPRs) for specified detection rates (DRs) were calculated.
Results Logistic regression modelling yielded a greater range of LRs. 16 odours were associated with PD; LRs ranged from 0.005-5511. 6 RBDSQ questions were associated with PD; LRs ranged from from 0.34-69. BRAIN test LRs ranged from 0.16-1311. For a 70% DR the FPR for the 16 odours was 2.4%, for 50% DRs, the BRAIN test FPR was 6.6% and 12.2% for the RBDSQ.
Conclusions Maximising information on PD markers can potentially improve the ability of algorithms to detect PD by generating LRs with a larger range of values than using dichotomised results.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Both the PREDICT-PD and Tracking Parkinson’s studies are funded by Parkinson’s UK Dr Alastair Noyce - Dr. Noyce is funded by the Barts Charity. Dr. Noyce reports additional grants from Parkinson's UK, Virginia Kieley benefaction, UCL-Movement Disorders Centre, grants and non-financial support from GE Healthcare, and personal fees from LEK, Guidepoint, Profile, Roche, Biogen Bial and Britannia, outside the submitted work.
Author Declarations
All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.
Yes
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Funding agencies: Both the PREDICT-PD and Tracking Parkinson’s studies are funded by Parkinson’s UK
Relevant conflicts of interests/financial disclosures: Nothing to report.
Data Availability
It is the intention of the authors to make study data available for sharing
