Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Dicere Non Nocere: Public Disclosure of Identifiable Patient Information by Health Professionals on Social Media

View ORCID ProfileMatthew S. Katz, Wasim Ahmed, Thomas G. Gutheil, Reshma Jagsi
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.05.20031526
Matthew S. Katz
1Department of Radiation Medicine, Lowell General Hospital, Lowell, MA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Matthew S. Katz
  • For correspondence: Matthew.Katz{at}lowellgeneral.org
Wasim Ahmed
2Newcastle University Business School, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas G. Gutheil
3Department of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston MA
4Massachusetts Mental Health Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Reshma Jagsi
5Center for Bioethics and Social Science in Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
MD DPhil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background Respecting patient privacy and confidentiality is critical for doctor-patient relationships and public trust in medical professionals. The frequency of potentially identifiable disclosures online during periods of active engagement is unknown. Our aim was to quantify potentially identifiable content shared by physicians and other health care providers on social media using the hashtag #ShareAStoryInOneTweet.

Methods We used Symplur Signals software to access Twitter’s API and searched for tweets including the hashtag. We identified 1206 tweets by doctors, nurses, and other health professionals out of 43,374 tweets shared May 1-31, 2018. We evaluated tweet content in January 2019, eight months after the study period. To determine the incidence of sharing names or potentially identifiable information about patients, we performed a content analysis of the 754 tweets in which tweets disclosed information about others. We also evaluated whether participants raised concerns about privacy breaches and estimated the frequency of deleted tweets. We used dual, blinded coding for a 10% sample to estimate inter-coder reliability for potential identifiability of tweet content using Cohen’s kappa statistic.

Results 656 participants, including 486 doctors (74.1%) and 98 nurses (14.9%), shared 754 tweets disclosing information about others rather than themselves. Professional participants sharing stories about patient care disclosed the time frame in 95 (12.6%) and included patient names in 15 (2.0%) of tweets. We estimated that friends or families could likely identify the clinical scenario described in 32.1% of the 754 tweets. Among 348 tweets about potentially living patients, we estimated 162 (46.6%) were likely identifiable by patients. Inter-coder reliability in rating the potential identifiability demonstrated 86.8% agreement, with a Cohen’s Kappa of 0.8 suggesting substantial agreement Of the 1206 tweets we identified, 78 (6.5%) had been deleted on the website but were still viewable in the analytics software dataset.

Conclusions During periods of active sharing online, nurses, physicians, and other health professionals may sometimes share more information than patients or families might expect. More study is needed to determine whether similar events arise frequently online and to understand how to best ensure that patients’ rights are adequately respected.

Competing Interest Statement

Dr. Katz reports common stock ownership in Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, Healthcare Services Group, Mazor Robotics, and U.S. Physical Therapy. Dr. Jagsi reports stock options as compensation for her advisory board role for Equity Quotient, a company that evaluates culture in health care companies. She has received personal fees from Amgen and Vizient for consulting, fees from the Greenwall Foundation for service as a grant reviewer, and grants for unrelated work from the National Institutes of Health, the Doris Duke Foundation, the Greenwall Foundation, the Susan G. Komen Foundation, and Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan for the Michigan Radiation Oncology Quality Consortium.

Funding Statement

Self-funded, no grants or industry funding.

Author Declarations

All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.

Yes

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • Disclosures: Dr. Katz reports common stock ownership in Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, Healthcare Services Group, Mazor Robotics, and U.S. Physical Therapy.

    Dr. Ahmed has nothing to disclose.

    Dr. Gutheil has nothing to disclose.

    Dr. Jagsi reports stock options as compensation for her advisory board role for Equity Quotient, a company that evaluates culture in health care companies. She has received personal fees from Amgen and Vizient for consulting, fees from the Greenwall Foundation for service as a grant reviewer, and grants for unrelated work from the National Institutes of Health, the Doris Duke Foundation, the Greenwall Foundation, the Susan G. Komen Foundation, and Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan for the Michigan Radiation Oncology Quality Consortium.

Data Availability

All data were obtained from the Twitter API through analytics software, Symplur Signals.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted March 06, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Dicere Non Nocere: Public Disclosure of Identifiable Patient Information by Health Professionals on Social Media
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Dicere Non Nocere: Public Disclosure of Identifiable Patient Information by Health Professionals on Social Media
Matthew S. Katz, Wasim Ahmed, Thomas G. Gutheil, Reshma Jagsi
medRxiv 2020.03.05.20031526; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.05.20031526
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Dicere Non Nocere: Public Disclosure of Identifiable Patient Information by Health Professionals on Social Media
Matthew S. Katz, Wasim Ahmed, Thomas G. Gutheil, Reshma Jagsi
medRxiv 2020.03.05.20031526; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.05.20031526

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Medical Ethics
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)