Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Quantifying the Financial Value of Clinical Specialty Choices and its Association with USMLE Step 1 Scores

Pranav Puri, Natalie Landman, Robert K. Smoldt, Denis A. Cortese
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.14.20036087
Pranav Puri
1Foundation Professor and Director (Dr Cortese)
BA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: puri.pranav{at}mayo.edu
Natalie Landman
2Associate Director (Mr Smoldt), and Executive Director (Dr Landman)
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert K. Smoldt
3Healthcare Delivery and Policy Program, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, and Supplemental Faculty (Dr Cortese and Mr Smoldt) and Contractor (Dr Landman)
MBA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Denis A. Cortese
4Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Scottsdale, Arizona. Mr Puri is a student, Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Scottsdale, Arizona
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Importance The factors influencing medical student clinical specialty choice have important implications for the future composition of the US physician workforce. The objective of this study was to determine the career net present values of US medical students’ clinical specialty choices and identify any relationships between a specialty’s net present value and competitiveness of admissions as measured by US Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 scores.

Methods Net present values were calculated by using results of the 2019 Doximity Physician Compensation report, a survey of 90,000 physicians. Mean USMLE Step 1 scores for matched US allopathic seniors in the 2018 National Resident Matching Program were used as a measure of clinical specialties’ competitiveness of admissions. We calculated a composite measure of net present value and annual work-hours by dividing each specialty’s net present value by the reported average number of hours worked per year.

Results In our analysis, orthopedic surgery had the highest net present value ($10,308,868), whereas family medicine had the lowest net present value ($5,274,546). Dermatology and plastic surgery had the highest mean USMLE Step 1 scores (249 for both), whereas family medicine had the lowest (220). Clinical specialties’ net present values were positively associated with mean USMLE Step 1 scores (Pearson’s r=0.82; p<.001).

Conclusion and Relevance In this study, we describe associations suggesting that medical students choose clinical specialties as rational economic agents and that these decisions are mediated by USMLE Step 1 scores. This underscores the importance of titrating and aligning economic incentives to improve the allocation of medical students into clinical specialties

Competing Interest Statement

Dr. Landman reports previously investing in Picmonic.

Funding Statement

This study was not externally supported.

Author Declarations

All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.

Yes

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

Data is available upon request

https://blog.doximity.com/articles/doximity-2019-physician-compensation-report-d0ca91d1-3cf1-4cbb-b403-a49b9ffa849f

  • Abbreviations

    NPV
    net present value
    NRMP
    National Resident Matching Program
    PGY
    postgraduate year
    USMLE
    US Medical Licensing Examination
  • Copyright 
    The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-ND 4.0 International license.
    Back to top
    PreviousNext
    Posted March 18, 2020.
    Download PDF
    Data/Code
    Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

    NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Quantifying the Financial Value of Clinical Specialty Choices and its Association with USMLE Step 1 Scores
    (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Share
    Quantifying the Financial Value of Clinical Specialty Choices and its Association with USMLE Step 1 Scores
    Pranav Puri, Natalie Landman, Robert K. Smoldt, Denis A. Cortese
    medRxiv 2020.03.14.20036087; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.14.20036087
    Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
    Citation Tools
    Quantifying the Financial Value of Clinical Specialty Choices and its Association with USMLE Step 1 Scores
    Pranav Puri, Natalie Landman, Robert K. Smoldt, Denis A. Cortese
    medRxiv 2020.03.14.20036087; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.14.20036087

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    Subject Area

    • Medical Education
    Subject Areas
    All Articles
    • Addiction Medicine (349)
    • Allergy and Immunology (668)
    • Allergy and Immunology (668)
    • Anesthesia (181)
    • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
    • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
    • Dermatology (223)
    • Emergency Medicine (399)
    • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
    • Epidemiology (12228)
    • Forensic Medicine (10)
    • Gastroenterology (759)
    • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
    • Geriatric Medicine (387)
    • Health Economics (680)
    • Health Informatics (2657)
    • Health Policy (1005)
    • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
    • Hematology (363)
    • HIV/AIDS (851)
    • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
    • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
    • Medical Education (399)
    • Medical Ethics (109)
    • Nephrology (436)
    • Neurology (3882)
    • Nursing (209)
    • Nutrition (577)
    • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
    • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
    • Oncology (2030)
    • Ophthalmology (585)
    • Orthopedics (240)
    • Otolaryngology (306)
    • Pain Medicine (250)
    • Palliative Medicine (75)
    • Pathology (473)
    • Pediatrics (1115)
    • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
    • Primary Care Research (452)
    • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
    • Public and Global Health (6527)
    • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
    • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
    • Respiratory Medicine (871)
    • Rheumatology (409)
    • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
    • Sports Medicine (342)
    • Surgery (448)
    • Toxicology (53)
    • Transplantation (185)
    • Urology (165)