Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Investigating the potential for machine learning prediction of patient outcomes: a retrospective study of hospital acquired pressure injuries

View ORCID ProfileJoshua J. Levy, Jorge F. Lima, Megan W. Miller, Gary L. Freed, A. James O’Malley, Rebecca T. Emeny
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.29.20047084
Joshua J. Levy
1Department of Epidemiology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, USA
2Department of Pathology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, USA
3Quantitative Biomedical Sciences, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Joshua J. Levy
  • For correspondence: joshua.j.levy.gr{at}dartmouth.edu
Jorge F. Lima
3Quantitative Biomedical Sciences, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Megan W. Miller
4Department of Wound Care Services, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gary L. Freed
4Department of Wound Care Services, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. James O’Malley
6The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rebecca T. Emeny
6The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background While recent research efforts to reduce pressure ulcers in the clinical context have focused on key retrospective characteristics, little work has focused on creating real-time predictive models to prevent this avoidable hospital-acquired injury. Furthermore, existing machine learning heuristics often fail to surpass traditional statistical models or provide individual-level risk assessments with explanations for each patient. Thus, we sought to compare the predictive performance of five machine learning and traditional statistical modeling techniques to predict the occurrence of Hospital Acquired Pressure Injuries (HAPI).

Methods Electronic Medical Record (EMR) information was collected from 57,227 hospitalizations, containing 241 positive HAPI cases, acquired from Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center from April 2011 to December 2016. The five classifiers were trained to predict HAPI incidence and performance was assessed using the C-statistic or Area Under the Receiver Operating Curve (AUC).

Results Logistic Regression was the best modeling approach (AUC=0.91±0.034). We report discordance between predictors deemed important by the machine learning models compared to traditional statistical model. We provide means to visually assess factors important to every patient’s prediction, regardless of the modeling approach, through Shapley Additive Explanations.

Conclusions Machine learning models will continue to inform decision making processes but should be compared to traditional modeling approaches to ensure proper utilization. Disagreements between important predictors found by traditional and machine learning modeling approaches can potentially confuse clinicians and as such need to be reconciled. Future efforts to analyze time-stamped, prospective medical record data will be enhanced by patient-specific details. These developments represent important steps forward in developing real-time predictive models that can be integrated and readily deployed in electronic medical record systems to reduce unnecessary harm.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

The Dartmouth Clinical and Translational Science Institute supported RTE under the award number UL1TR001086 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). JJL is supported by the Burroughs Wellcome Fund Big Data in the Life Sciences training grant at Dartmouth. The funding bodies above did not have any role in the study design, data collection, analysis and interpretation, or writing of the manuscript.

Author Declarations

All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.

Yes

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

The EMR dataset curated from Dartmouth-Hitchcock records contains information that could compromise research participant privacy/consent and thus cannot be released due to HIPAA regulations. An IRB approval is required for on-site access and review of the data.

  • List of Abbreviations

    HAPI
    Hospital Acquired Pressure Injuries
    EMR
    Electronic Medical Records
    AUC
    Area Under the Receiver Operating Curve; C-Statistic
    LOS
    Length of Stay
    OR
    Time in Operating Room
    MICE
    Multiple Imputation by Chained Equations
    SMOTE
    Synthetic Minority Over-Sampling Technique
    CRP
    C-Reactive Protein Levels
    NPO
    Patient’s Diet Taken by Mouth
    SHAP
    Shapley Additive Explanations
  • Copyright 
    The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
    Back to top
    PreviousNext
    Posted April 08, 2020.
    Download PDF

    Supplementary Material

    Data/Code
    Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

    NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Investigating the potential for machine learning prediction of patient outcomes: a retrospective study of hospital acquired pressure injuries
    (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Share
    Investigating the potential for machine learning prediction of patient outcomes: a retrospective study of hospital acquired pressure injuries
    Joshua J. Levy, Jorge F. Lima, Megan W. Miller, Gary L. Freed, A. James O’Malley, Rebecca T. Emeny
    medRxiv 2020.03.29.20047084; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.29.20047084
    Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
    Citation Tools
    Investigating the potential for machine learning prediction of patient outcomes: a retrospective study of hospital acquired pressure injuries
    Joshua J. Levy, Jorge F. Lima, Megan W. Miller, Gary L. Freed, A. James O’Malley, Rebecca T. Emeny
    medRxiv 2020.03.29.20047084; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.29.20047084

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    Subject Area

    • Health Informatics
    Subject Areas
    All Articles
    • Addiction Medicine (349)
    • Allergy and Immunology (668)
    • Allergy and Immunology (668)
    • Anesthesia (181)
    • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
    • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
    • Dermatology (223)
    • Emergency Medicine (399)
    • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
    • Epidemiology (12228)
    • Forensic Medicine (10)
    • Gastroenterology (759)
    • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
    • Geriatric Medicine (387)
    • Health Economics (680)
    • Health Informatics (2657)
    • Health Policy (1005)
    • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
    • Hematology (363)
    • HIV/AIDS (851)
    • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
    • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
    • Medical Education (399)
    • Medical Ethics (109)
    • Nephrology (436)
    • Neurology (3882)
    • Nursing (209)
    • Nutrition (577)
    • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
    • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
    • Oncology (2030)
    • Ophthalmology (585)
    • Orthopedics (240)
    • Otolaryngology (306)
    • Pain Medicine (250)
    • Palliative Medicine (75)
    • Pathology (473)
    • Pediatrics (1115)
    • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
    • Primary Care Research (452)
    • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
    • Public and Global Health (6527)
    • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
    • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
    • Respiratory Medicine (871)
    • Rheumatology (409)
    • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
    • Sports Medicine (342)
    • Surgery (448)
    • Toxicology (53)
    • Transplantation (185)
    • Urology (165)