Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

A COVID-19 Risk Assessment for the US Labor Force

Samantha Maher, Alexandra E Hill, Peter Britton, View ORCID ProfileEli P. Fenichel, View ORCID ProfilePeter Daszak, Carlos Zambrana-Torrelio, View ORCID ProfileJude Bayham
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.13.20063776
Samantha Maher
1EcoHealth Alliance, New York City, NY
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alexandra E Hill
2Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter Britton
2Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eli P. Fenichel
3Yale University, New Haven, CT
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Eli P. Fenichel
  • For correspondence: eli.fenichel{at}yale.edu
Peter Daszak
1EcoHealth Alliance, New York City, NY
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Peter Daszak
Carlos Zambrana-Torrelio
1EcoHealth Alliance, New York City, NY
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jude Bayham
2Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jude Bayham
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

The consequences of COVID-19 infection varies substantially based on individual social risk factors and predisposing health conditions. Understanding this variability may be critical for targeting COVID-19 control measures, resources and policies, including efforts to return people back to the workplace. We compiled individual level data from the National Health Information Survey and Quarterly Census of Earnings and Wages to estimate the number of at-risk workers for each US county and industry, accounting for both social and health risks. Nearly 80% of all workers have at least one health risk and 11% are over 60 with an additional health risk. We document important variation in the at-risk population across states, counties, and industries that could provide a strategic underpinning to a staged return to work.

One Sentence Summary There is important variability in the proportion of the US workforce at risk for COVID-19 complications across regions, counties, and industries that should be considered when targeting control and relief policies, and a staged return to work.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

Funding for authors Maher, Daszak, and Zambrana-Torrelio from EcoHealth Alliance is provided by the The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIH) and the US Agency for International Development (USAID).

Author Declarations

All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.

Yes

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

all data are publicly available

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted April 17, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A COVID-19 Risk Assessment for the US Labor Force
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
A COVID-19 Risk Assessment for the US Labor Force
Samantha Maher, Alexandra E Hill, Peter Britton, Eli P. Fenichel, Peter Daszak, Carlos Zambrana-Torrelio, Jude Bayham
medRxiv 2020.04.13.20063776; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.13.20063776
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
A COVID-19 Risk Assessment for the US Labor Force
Samantha Maher, Alexandra E Hill, Peter Britton, Eli P. Fenichel, Peter Daszak, Carlos Zambrana-Torrelio, Jude Bayham
medRxiv 2020.04.13.20063776; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.13.20063776

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Public and Global Health
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)