Abstract
Hereditary Transthyretin (TTR) Amyloidosis (hATTR) is a rare life-threatening disorder caused by amyloidogenic coding mutations located in TTR gene. To understand the high phenotypic variability observed among carriers of TTR disease-causing mutations, we conducted an epigenome-wide association study (EWAS) assessing more than 700,000 methylation sites and testing i) TTR coding mutation carriers vs. non-carriers, and ii) Val30Met (rs28933979) carriers vs. carriers of other TTR mutations. In the first analysis, we observed a significant methylation change at cg09097335 site located in Beta-secretase 2 (BACE2) gene (beta =-0.60, p=6.26×10−8). This gene is involved in a protein interaction network enriched for biological processes and molecular pathways related to amyloid-beta metabolism (Gene Ontology:0050435, q=0.007), amyloid fiber formation (Reactome HSA-977225, q=0.008), and Alzheimer’s disease (KEGG hsa05010, q=2.2×10−4). Additionally, TTR and BACE2 share APP (Amyloid-beta precursor protein) as a validated protein interactor. In the second analysis, we observed that Val30Met carriers have a significant hypomethylation at cg13139646 site located in TTR exonic region (beta=-2.18, p=3.34×10−11). A methylation quantitative trait locus analysis considering a 20 Kb region including TTR coding and non-coding regions suggested that TTR coding variants (Ile68Leu, rs121918085; Ala120Ser, rs876658108; Gly6Ser, rs1800458) have independent effects on cg13139646 methylation, while no independent effect was observed for non-coding variants. In conclusion, we provide novel insights related to the molecular mechanisms involved in the complex heterogeneity of hATTR, highlighting the role of epigenetic regulation in this rare disorder.
Background
Hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis (OMIM#105210) (hATTR) is a life-threatening disorder caused by transthyretin (TTR) misfolding and consequently amyloid fibril deposition in several tissues (e.g., peripheral nerves, heart, and gastrointestinal tract) (1, 2). This rare condition is characterized by extreme clinical heterogeneity including age of onset, penetrance, and clinical display (3-5). To date, more than 130 amyloidogenic mutations have been identified in the coding regions of the TTR gene, which are the cause of hATTR (6). The prevalence of hATTR is estimated to be approximately 1/100,000 (7). However, endemic areas of hATTR were identified in Portugal and Sweden (4, 5). Although both of these regions are affected by the same amyloidogenic mutation, Val30Met (rs28933979), their penetrance and age of onset are different: early age of onset and high penetrance in Portugal (4, 5, 8, 9); late age of onset and low penetrance in Sweden and in non-endemic countries (3, 10, 11). It has been hypothesized that hATTR phenotypic heterogeneity is due to the contribution of genetic and non-genetic factors involved in the complex genotype-phenotype correlation observed (12-18). Recent data strongly support the role of non-coding regulatory variation on TTR gene expression, as one of the mechanisms affecting the phenotypic manifestations observed in carriers of TTR amyloidogenic mutations (19-22). Among genomic regulatory features, epigenetic modifications are demonstrated to be key mechanisms in modulating a wide range of molecular functions and potential targets to develop novel treatments (23-25). Of several epigenetic modifications, DNA methylation is the most studied with respect to human traits and diseases (23). With respect to monogenic disorders, methylation studies investigated the role of epigenetic changes involved in the phenotypic expression observed among carriers of disease-causing mutations (26-28). Although epigenetic modifications have the potential to be involved in hATTR pathogenic mechanisms, to our knowledge no study explored methylation changes of patients affected by this life-threatening disease. In the present study, we conducted an epigenome-wide association study (EWAS) to identify DNA methylation associated with hATTR, investigating 48 carriers of TTR amyloidogenic mutations and 32 controls. We also tested whether there are significant epigenetic changes among carriers of different amyloidogenic mutations. The results obtained showed: i) hATTR confirmed cases have significant methylation changes in modifier genes potentially involved in amyloidogenic processes; ii) carriers of Val30Met mutation showed a significant hypomethylation in TTR gene when compared to the carriers of other TTR amyloidogenic mutations.
Results
The epigenome-wide analysis testing the differences between 48 carriers of TTR amyloidogenic mutatinos and 32 controls identified a significant methylation site surviving false discovery rate multiple testing correction (FDR q<0.05) at the cg09097335 site located in Beta-secretase 2 (BACE2) gene body (beta = -0.60, p=6.26×10−8, FDR q=0.044; Table 1). Carriers of TTR amyloidogenic mutations showed a significant hypomethylation when compared to controls (Figure 1). To characterize the function of BACE2 protein product, we investigated interactive proteins based on multiple experimental and computational evidence, identifying five candidates with medium-to-highest interaction confidence (Figure 2). These include FYN (FYN proto-oncogene, Src family tyrosine kinase; interaction score=0.809), BACE1 (Beta-secretase 1; interaction score=0.804), APP (amyloid-beta precursor protein; interaction score=0.430), IGHV3-11 (immunoglobulin heavy variable 3-11; interaction score=0.412), and ENSG00000259680 (uncharacterized protein similar to an immunoglobulin heavy variable 3/OR16 gene; interaction score=0.412). Among them, TTR showed the highest interaction with APP protein (interaction score=0.936). BACE2 protein interactive network (Figure 2) showed functional enrichments for several biological processes and molecular pathways (Table 2). Among the enrichments directly related to BACE2 function, we observed: Alzheimer’s disease (KEGG hsa05010, FDR q=2.2×10−4) related to the interaction of BACE2 with APP and BACE1; membrane protein ectodomain proteolysis (GO:0006509, FDR q=0.007) and amyloid-beta metabolic process (GO:0050435, FDR q=0.007) related to BACE2-BACE1 interaction; protein metabolic process (GO:0019538, FDR q=0.043) related to the interaction of BACE with APP, BACE1, FYN, and IGHV3-11. The interactions of other proteins within BACE2 interactive network also highlighted amyloid-related functional enrichments: amyloid fiber formation (Reactome HSA-977225, FDR q=0.008) and response to amyloid-beta (GO:1904645, FDR q=0.009) related to the interaction of APP with BACE1 and FYN, respectively.
Significant methylation sites identified in the case-control analysis and in the Val30Met analysis. Information about cg probe (cgID), chromosome localization (chr), position (pos), CpG context, mapped gene, gene region, effect (beta), p value (p-value) and false discovery rate (FDR) q value are reported.
Enrichments for gene ontologies (GO) of biological processes and for Reactome and KEGG molecular pathways (HSA and hsa, respectively).
Methylation levels of cg09097696 site in carriers vs. non-carriers of amylodogenic mutations.
BACE2 protein interaction network. Node colour of the protein is proportional to the interaction score with BACE2. Connector shade and width are proportional to the interaction confidence (highest, high, and medium).
Comparing the epigenetic profile of Val30Met carriers (N=33) vs. that of carriers of other TTR mutations (N=15), we identified a methylation site surviving the epigenome-wide multiple testing correction (Table 1). A CpG site located in the second exon of TTR gene (cg13139646) showed a significant hypomethylation in Val30Met carriers when compared with carriers of other TTR mutations (beta= -2.18, p=3.34×10−11, FDR q=2.40×10−5; Figure 3). To better understand whether the association of Val30Met with cg13139646 methylation is due to the effect of other regulatory variants in LD with this amyloidogenic mutation, we conducted a methylation quantitative trait locus (mQTL) analysis in a subset (N=15) of hATTR patients with complete sequencing of TTR coding and non-coding regions. Val30Met confirmed the strongest association with cg13139646 methylation (beta= -1.07, p=0.023; Additional File 1). None of the variants in LD with Val30Met showed stronger evidence of association (Additional File 2). Among the variants tested, Ile68Leu mutation was also associated with cg13139646 methylation: Ile68Leu carriers are hypermethylated when compared to the carriers of other mutations (beta=1.71, p= 0.045; Additional File 1). Suggestive evidences of associations were also observed for other TTR coding variants: Ala120Ser (beta=1.62, p=0.058) and Gly6Ser (rs1800458, beta=-1.14, p=0.069). These coding variants are not in LD each other (LD r2=0; Additional File 2), indicating each association on cg13139646 methylation is independent. However, non-coding variants located in the upstream and downstream regions of TTR gene showed a perfect LD (r2=1; Additional File 2) with Ile68Leu (LD with upstream variant rs72922940) and Ala120Ser (LD with downstream variant rs76431866 and upstream variants ss1360573709 and ss1360573712).
Methylation levels of cg13139646 site in Val30Met carriers vs. carriers of other TTR amyloidogenic mutations.
Finally, we explored whether the epigenetic changes identified are associated with symptoms reported by patients affected by hATTR. None of the associations reached a statistical significance (Additional File 3).
Discussion
hATTR is a rare multi-organ disorder caused by TTR misfolding and consequently amyloid deposition in several tissues (29). This life-threatening condition is characterized by high clinical heterogeneity with respect to age of onset, penetrance, and phenotypic manifestation (1-10, 29). Although TTR amyloidogenic mutations are the cause of TTR misfolding, non-coding variation and modifier genes are hypothesized to be involved in wide variability of phenotypic manifestations observed in carriers of TTR disease-causing mutations (12, 15, 17-22). Epigenetic modifications (e.g., DNA methylation changes) could also play an important role in the molecular network regulating the hATTR amyloidogenic process (25). To explore this hypothesis, we conducted an EWAS investigating more than 700,000 methylation sites in 48 carriers of TTR amyloidogenic mutations and 32 non-carriers. A CpG site (cg09097335) located in BACE2 gene was significantly hypomethylated in carriers when compared to non-carriers. This gene encodes Beta-secretase 2, a protein mainly known for its role in cleaving APP protein in amyloid-beta, which is a key factor involved in AD pathogenesis (30-32). Several studies showed that, unlike BACE1 that is the primary β-secretase protein cleaving APP to amyloid-beta, BACE2 is poorly expressed in the brain and its cleaving ability increases following an inflammatory response (33). APP processing occurs via three proteolytic cleavages caused by α-β-and γ-secretase (34). In non-amyloidogenic processes, α-and γ-secretases lead to the production of a smaller P3 fragment and APP intracellular domain, while, in the amyloidogenic pathway, β-secretase and γ-secretase produce amyloid-beta (34-38). Our results also showed a high-confidence interaction between APP and TTR. Numerous studies explored the interactions between these two amyloidogenic proteins, displaying a relevant biological role of TTR in amyloid-beta aggregation and clearance in AD patients (39-43). Specifically, altered TTR stability seems to reduce the clearance of amyloid-beta, increasing its toxicity in the brain (39-41). Metal ions and interaction with other proteins could also affect TTR stability (39). Interestingly, a significant association between amyloid-beta levels and AD was identified in AD patients with TTR Val30Met (39, 43). A putative amyloidogenic role of amyloid-beta in hATTR was also identified in a post-mortem analysis of a Val30Met carrier where both TTR and amyloid-beta were deposited in the cerebral leptomeningeal and cortical blood vessel walls with a part of the vessel wall occupied by a combination of TTR and amyloid-beta aberrant proteins (42). These previous findings strongly indicate an interplay between the pathogenic mechanisms involved in hATTR and AD. Our epigenome-wide study identified BACE2 as a potential key factor in this interaction. As previously discussed, BACE2 protein plays a minor role in APP cleaving in the brain (32, 33), while its activity increases in peripheral tissues under inflammatory response (33). Under this scenario, we hypothesize that the methylation change observed in the carriers of TTR mutations is due to BACE2 response to the inflammation induced by TTR amyloidogenic process in peripheral tissues (44).
In the epigenome-wide analysis testing carriers of TTR Val30Met vs. carriers of other TTR amyloidogenic mutations, we identified a CpG site, cg13139646, located in the second exon of TTR gene. Follow-up analyses showed that the methylation at this CpG site is independently associated with other TTR coding variants but not by non-coding variants. It is known that methylation profile differs between exonic and intronic regions (45). Although the transcriptional modulation is strongly regulated by the methylation of promoter regions, hypomethylation in exonic regions is associated with transcriptional upregulation while hypermethylation could promote the transcriptional silencing (45, 46). As mentioned, TTR amyloid accumulation causes tissue damage leading to inflammatory response activation, increasing reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and TTR oxidation (47). Val30Met mutation has been associated with increased S-nitrosylation during the amyloidogenic process, leading to the production of nitric oxide (NO), which increases the formation of amyloid fibrils (47). The association of Val30Met with these complex biochemical changes could explain the hypomethylation of cg13139646 in the carriers as a response to the specific amyloidogenic process induced by this mutation. We could also speculate that Val30Met and its induced biochemical changes are part of a feedback loop also including methylation changes and transcriptomic regulation of TTR gene. The independent effects observed with respect to other TTR coding variants could be related to the specific amyloidogenic process induced by them. We also observed suggestive evidence of association between cg13139646 methylation and Gly6Ser, a benign TTR coding variant. However, Levine and Bland (48) further explored the effect of this non-amyloidogenic mutation in individuals with autonomic and small fiber neuropathy, reporting a potential role of Gly6ser in the predisposition to neurodegenerative diseases.
Conclusions
Our study provided novel insights regarding the pathogenesis of hATTR, supporting the involvement of methylation changes in the amyloidogenic process induced by TTR disease-causing mutations. Further studies will be needed to characterize specific mechanisms underlying the epigenetic associations, in particular, the potential role of amyloid-beta metabolic process and inflammatory response. The understanding of how methylation changes modulate the penetrance and the severity of TTR mutations could lead to the identification of novel targets to develop treatments and screening tools for the carriers.
Methods
Thirty-eight symptomatic patients and 10 asymptomatic TTR mutations carriers were recruited from three Italian centers for the treatment of systemic amyloidosis: “San Giovanni Calibita” Fatebenefratelli Hospital, Isola Tiberina – Rome, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” – Rome and Careggi University Hospital – Florence (16-20). Thirty-two controls were recruited by the Department of Biology – University of Rome “Tor Vergata” (Table 3).
Description of the study population. Information about TTR amyloidogenic mutations, sex, age, epigenetically-determined smoking status (never smoker, NS; former smoker, FS; current smoker, CS), and epigenetically-estimated ranges of T cells (CD8T and CD4T), Natural Killer cells (NK), B cells, monocytes (Mono) and granulocytes (Gran) are reported.
hATTR diagnosis was based on the presence of clinical signs and symptoms and the presence of an amyloidogenic mutation on TTR gene. The coding mutations identified include: Val30Met (rs28933979), Phe64Leu (rs121918091), Ile68Leu (rs121918085), Ala120Ser (rs876658108), and Val122Ile (rs76992529). One hATTR patient is a carrier of a mutation (rs36204272) in an intronic region with a putative clinical impact (48). Information regarding the organ involvements was collected for each patient: peripheral and nerve involvement (nerve conduction study); cardiac involvement (electrocardiographic and echocardiography anomalies); gastrointestinal involvement (gastric paresis, stypsis, or diarrhea); autonomic neurological involvement (orthostatic hypotension and urinary incontinence); ocular involvement (vitreous opacities): and carpal tunnel syndrome (median nerve decompression) (11, 49-51). The present study was approved under the protocol 39/18 by the Comitato Etico Indipendente, Fondazione Policlinico Tor Vergata – Rome, Italy.
DNA methylation analysis
DNA was extracted using the phenol/chloroform protocol (52) and purified through Amicon Ultra-0.5 mL Centrifugal Filters (EMD Millipore) to achieve a DNA concentration of 100 ng/µL. DNA concentration was checked via NanoDrop technology (ND-1000, Thermofisher Scientific) and Qubit Quantitation technology (High Accuracy & Sensitivity, Thermofisher). DNA methylation analysis was executed in two phases: the EZ DNA Methylation kit (Zymo Research) was used to perform sodium bisulfite conversion; the Illumina Infinium Methylation EPIC Chip (with over 850,000 methylation sites; Illumina Inc.) was used to quantify DNA methylation according to the standard Illumina protocol. The methylation array analysis was performed at the Connecting bio-research and Industry Center, Trieste – Italy.
Preprocessing, quality control, and normalization
The raw signal intensity files were processed and cleaned using R 3.6 with ChAMP package (53). The ratio of methylated and unmethylated intensities from idat files was converted into beta values for further processing. The probes failing thresholds on detection value, bead count, sites near SNPs, probes that align to multiple positions, sex chromosomes and outliers were removed. None of the samples failed quality control. The remaining 718,509 probes for 80 individuals were normalized with BMIQ. Batch effects were assessed using singular vector decomposition and corrected with ComBat method (54). The genomic lambda of the case-control association was 1.03, calculated using QQPerm package (https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/QQperm/index.html).
Blood cell type composition, genetic variability estimation, and smoking prediction
References-based method was employed to adjust for the heterogeneity due to the cell type composition of the whole blood samples investigated (55). This method uses specific DNA methylation signatures derived from purified whole blood cell-type as biomarkers of cell identity, to correct beta value dataset. Cell proportions for five cell-types (B cells, granulocytes, monocytes, natural killer cells, and T cells) were detected, and a linear regression was applied (53, 55).
To account for the genetic variability among the samples investigated, principal components (PCs) were calculated using the method proposed by Barfield, Almli (56). This approach allowed us to compute PCs based on CpGs selected for their proximity to SNPs. The data obtained can be used to adjust for population stratification in DNA methylation studies when genome-wide SNP data are unavailable (56). Cigarette smoke has a very large effect on DNA methylation profile, triggering alteration at multiple CpGs (57). Consequently, smoking status needs to be considered as a potential confounder in epigenetic association studies. EpiSmokEr package was used to classify the smoking status of each participant on the basis of their epigenetic profile (58). Briefly, EpiSmoker is a prediction tool that provides smoking probabilities for each individual (never-smoker, former-smoker, and current smoker) using a set of 121 informative CpG sites (57).
Data analysis
We conducted two epigenome-wide analyses testing 718,509 methylation sites. First, we investigated the methylation changes between 48 cases (i.e., carriers of a TTR amyloidogenic mutation) and 32 controls. Second, we analyzed the epigenetic differences between Val30Met carriers (the most frequent mutation in our cohort; N= 33) and the carriers of other TTR mutations (N= 15). In both association analyses, we implemented a linear regression analysis including cell composition proportions, top three genetic PCs, epigenetically-determined smoking status, age, and sex as covariates. FDR method was applied to adjust the results for multiple testing (59) and the q-value < 0.05 was considered as the significance threshold. STRING v.11.0 (60) was used to identify protein interaction with the loci identified, considering experiments, co-expression, co-occurrence, gene fusion, and neighborhood as active sources and an interaction score higher than 0.4 (medium confidence). The protein interaction network was investigated further conducting functional enrichments association related to the protein-protein interactions identified considering Gene Ontologies (61) for biological processes and molecular pathways available from Reactome Database (62) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) (63). FDR (q-value < 0.05) was applied to account for multiple testing assuming the whole genome as the statistical background. To detect associations between genetic variants and methylation changes in sites located in the chromosomal region of TTR gene, we investigated the association of epigenetic changes with genetic variability of 15 hATTR affected individuals analyzed previously (20). Plink 1.09 (64) was used to perform association analysis. Haploview (65) was used to determine linkage disequilibrium (LD) among tested variants.
Data Availability
Data supporting the findings of this study are available within this article and its additional files.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This study was approved under the protocol 39/18 by the Comitato Etico Indipendente, Fondazione Policlinico Tor Vergata – Rome, Italy. Informed consent was obtained from each participant involved.
Availability of data and materials
Data supporting the findings of this study are available within this article and its additional files.
Competing interests
Drs. Fuciarelli and Polimanti received research grants from Pfizer Inc. to conduct epigenetic studies of hATTR. The other authors reported no biomedical financial interests or potential conflicts of interest.
Funding
This study was supported by an Investigator-Initiated Research from Pfizer Inc. to the University of Rome Tor Vergata. Pfizer Inc. had no role in the study design, data analysis, and results interpretation of the present study.
Authors’ contributions
ADL, FDA, MF, and RP were involved in study design. MDG, ML, MS, FP, SF, and DM conducted the recruitment and assessment of the participants. ADL, GAP, and RP carried out the statistical analysis. All authors were involved in the interpretation of the results. ADL and RP wrote the first draft of the manuscript and all authors contributed to the final version of the manuscript.
Acknowledgements
We thank the participants involved in this study and their caregivers.
List of abbreviations
- AD
- Alzheimer disease
- APP
- amyloid beta precursor protein
- hATTR
- Hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis
- BACE1
- beta-secretase 1
- BACE2
- beta-secretase 2
- EWAS
- epigenome-wide association studies
- FDR
- false discovery rate
- FYN
- FYN proto-oncogene
- Src
- family tyrosine kinase
- IGHV3-11
- immunoglobulin heavy variable 3-11
- LD
- linkage disequilibrium
- mQTL
- methylation quantitative trait loci
- NO
- nitric oxide
- ROS
- reactive oxygen species
- TTR
- transthyretin.