Abstract
Background Transport mobility, and access to driving, is an important factor in social inclusion and well-being. Doctors have an important role to play in supporting safe mobility through applying the knowledge developed in the field of traffic medicine and incorporating state of the art national and international medical fitness to drive (MFTD) guidelines. Little is known about the profile of MFTD in postgraduate curricula for core and higher specialist training.
Aims We profiled the inclusion of MFTD in the curricula of postgraduate core, higher and streamlined medical and surgical specialties in the Republic of Ireland and the UK. Methods: All publicly available syllabi of basic and higher/ streamlined specialist training in postgraduate medical and surgical colleges in both jurisdictions were analysed (N = 122).
Results In Ireland, 25% of basic training schemes included MFTD in the curriculum. Two-thirds of curricula of higher specialty and streamlined training schemes also included MFTD. For the UK, 44% of core and 36% of higher training schemes curricula included MFTD. Just under one-quarter of all curricula reviewed included MFTD for more than one medical condition or treatment. Common topics in both Irish and UK curricula included seizures/epilepsy, syncope and visual disturbances.
Conclusion There are notable deficits in MFTD training for specialists in Ireland and the UK. Common conditions which can significantly impair MFTD such as stroke, diabetes and alcohol use disorders are severely underrepresented and curricula should be revisited to include relevant training and guidance for MFTD for trainees.
Main Messages
Doctors have an important role in supporting safe driving among patients with a range of medical conditions
Basic and higher specialist training curricula in a range of specialities in the British Isles are deficient in content relating to medical fitness to drive
Curricular development for specialist training should include provision of concise and speciality-relevant guidance on medical fitness to drive
Research Questions
What barriers exist currently to the inclusion of medical fitness to drive and how could these be mitigated?
What are the specialty-relevant prioritizations of medical conditions related to medical fitness to drive for inclusion in each curriculum?
What resources and evidence are available to specialist training programmes to support the guidance for medical fitness to drive in their curricula?
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
No external funding
Author Declarations
All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.
Yes
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Available on request and in tables in paper
