ABSTRACT
Purpose To describe and compare the morphology of the corneal layers from adults and aging individuals.
Methods The study was conducted with normal corneas (n = 15) of predominantly male individuals grouped into two classes (group I: < 40 years; group II: ≥ 40 years). To describe and to compare the corneas, the thickness of the layers, the integrity of the stromal lamellae and the endothelial lesions, SEM images of the central and peripheral regions of each cornea were quantified.
Results The total thickness of the cornea was largest in the periphery only for group I. The Bowman, Descemet and endothelium layers of group I were thicker at the periphery of the corneas than their respective central regions, while for group II, this difference was observed only in the Bowman layer. Comparison between groups showed that the Bowman layer was thicker (central region), while the Descemet membrane and endothelium were thinner in group II; A greater number of endothelial lesions in both regions of the corneas was observed in group II, but no difference in the total number of interlamellar slits.
Conclusions The morphological changes observed in group II could be related to the reduction in the pool of stem cell of limbus and, despite the corneas being from healthy individuals, these changes could compromise the success of transplantation. Our results point to an update of corneal uptake protocols and they may aid in the refractive surgeries interventions in individuals from different age groups.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This research received no external funding.
Author Declarations
All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.
Yes
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.
