Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Definitive Radiation Therapy With Dose Escalation Is Beneficial For Patients With Squamous Cell Cancer Of The Esophagus

Sarbani Ghosh-Laskar, Naveen Mummudi, Saurabha Kumar, Mukesh Chandre, Shagun Mishra, Anil Tibdewal, JP Agarwal, Vijay Patil, Vanita Noronha, Kumar Prabash, Sabita Jiwnani, George Karimundackal, CS Pramesh, Prachi Patil
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.29.20077826
Sarbani Ghosh-Laskar
1Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, India Email:
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: sarbanilaskar{at}gmail.com sarbanilaskar{at}gmail.com
Naveen Mummudi
2Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, India; Email:
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: mbnaveenkb{at}gmail.com
Saurabha Kumar
3Department of Radiation Oncology, Mazumdar Shaw Cancer Center, India Email:
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: dr_saurabha{at}yahoo.com
Mukesh Chandre
4Department of Radiation Oncology, NAMCO Charitable Trust Hospital, India, Email:
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: mukeshchandre{at}gmail.com
Shagun Mishra
5Department of Radiation Oncology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute, India Email:
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: misrashagun{at}yahoo.com
Anil Tibdewal
6Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, India Email:
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: aniltibdewal{at}gmail.com
JP Agarwal
7Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, India Email:
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: agarwaljp{at}tmc.gov.in
Vijay Patil
8Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, India Email:
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: vijaypgi{at}gmail.com
Vanita Noronha
9Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, India Email:
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: vanita.noronha{at}gmail.com
Kumar Prabash
10Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, India Email:
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: kprabhash1{at}gmail.com
Sabita Jiwnani
11Department of Thoracic Surgery, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, India Email:
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: sabitajiwnani{at}gmail.com
George Karimundackal
12Department of Thoracic Surgery, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha Natio Institute, India Email:
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: gkarimundackal{at}gmail.com
CS Pramesh
13Department of Thoracic Surgery, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, India Email:
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: cspramesh{at}gmail.com
Prachi Patil
14Department of Digestive Diseases and Clinical Nutrition, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, India Email:
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: prachipatil{at}gmail.com
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE We report the long term follow-up, toxicity, and outcomes of patients with localized squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus (ESCC) who underwent definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) at our institute.

MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients diagnosed with carcinoma post cricoid, upper cervical and thoracic oesophagus and treated with dCRT treated between January 2000 and March 2012 were retrospectively analysed. Data was extracted from the hospital medical records and patient files. Patients deemed inoperable received upfront RT with or without concurrent chemotherapy and patients with borderline resectable and/or bulky disease received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by CRT or RT alone. Radiotherapy was delivered in two phases to a maximum dose of 63 Gy in daily fractions of 1.8 Gy using conventional or conformal techniques. Overall survival and progression free survival were defined from date of registration and were calculated by Kaplan-Meier method with comparisons between different subgroup performed using log rank test. All data were analyzed using SPSS Version 22.

RESULTS Three hundred and fourteen patients with ESCC treated with dCRT were included in this analysis. Median age at presentation was 56 years and median Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) at presentation was 70. Two-third of patients were treated with conformal technique alone or a combination of conventional and conformal technique. Median dose of radiation delivered was 60 Gy (range 30.6 Gy – 70 Gy). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was administered in about 35% patients and 57% patients received concurrent chemotherapy. About 82% patients (77%) completed their planned treatment course; 10% patients required hospitalization during treatment due to complications and 7 patients did not complete treatment. Grade 1/2 dermatitis and mucositis was seen in 77% and 71% patients respectively. Grade 3 non-hematological and hematological toxicities were seen infrequently. Complete response at first follow up was observed in 56% of patients. At a median follow up of 56 months, 77 patients were alive with controlled disease. The 1-, 2- and 3-yr OS were 80%, 67% and 62% respectively. Median PFS was 28 months; 1-, 2- and 3-yr PFS were 66%, 52% and 46% respectively. A higher RT dose was found to be a significant predictor for OS and PFS on both uni- and multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION Our study highlights that delivery of higher RT doses (≥63□Gy) is feasible in this patient group and that a higher RT dose was associated with significantly better PFS and OS.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

No funding was received for conduct of the study

Author Declarations

All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.

Yes

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All relevant are available for review

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted May 04, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Definitive Radiation Therapy With Dose Escalation Is Beneficial For Patients With Squamous Cell Cancer Of The Esophagus
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Definitive Radiation Therapy With Dose Escalation Is Beneficial For Patients With Squamous Cell Cancer Of The Esophagus
Sarbani Ghosh-Laskar, Naveen Mummudi, Saurabha Kumar, Mukesh Chandre, Shagun Mishra, Anil Tibdewal, JP Agarwal, Vijay Patil, Vanita Noronha, Kumar Prabash, Sabita Jiwnani, George Karimundackal, CS Pramesh, Prachi Patil
medRxiv 2020.04.29.20077826; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.29.20077826
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Definitive Radiation Therapy With Dose Escalation Is Beneficial For Patients With Squamous Cell Cancer Of The Esophagus
Sarbani Ghosh-Laskar, Naveen Mummudi, Saurabha Kumar, Mukesh Chandre, Shagun Mishra, Anil Tibdewal, JP Agarwal, Vijay Patil, Vanita Noronha, Kumar Prabash, Sabita Jiwnani, George Karimundackal, CS Pramesh, Prachi Patil
medRxiv 2020.04.29.20077826; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.29.20077826

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Oncology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)