Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Population Level Covid-19 Mortality

Cary P. Gross, Utibe R. Essien, Saamir Pasha, Jacob R Gross, Shi-yi Wang, Marcella Nunez-Smith
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.07.20094250
Cary P. Gross
1National Clinician Scholars Program, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: cary.gross{at}yale.edu
Utibe R. Essien
2Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Saamir Pasha
1National Clinician Scholars Program, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jacob R Gross
4School of Arts & Sciences, Tufts University, Medford, MA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shi-yi Wang
5Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marcella Nunez-Smith
6Equity Research and Innovation Center, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background Current reporting of Covid-19 mortality data by race and ethnicity across the United States could bias our understanding of population-mortality disparities. Moreover, stark differences in age distribution by race and ethnicity groups are seldom accounted for in analyses.

Methods To address these gaps, we conducted a cross-sectional study using publicly-reported Covid-19 mortality data to assess the quality of race and ethnicity data (Black, Latinx, white), and estimated age-adjusted disparities using a random effects meta-analytic approach.

Results We found only 28 states, and NYC, reported race and ethnicity-stratified Covid-19 mortality along with large variation in the percent of missing race and ethnicity data by state. Aggregated relative risk of death estimates for Black compared to the white population was 3.57 (95% CI: 2.84-4.48). Similarly, Latinx population displayed 1.88 (95% CI: 1.61-2.19) times higher risk of death than white patients.

Discussion In states providing race and ethnicity data, we identified significant population-level Covid-19 mortality disparities. We demonstrated the importance of adjusting for age differences across population groups to prevent underestimating disparities in younger population groups. The availability of high-quality and comprehensive race and ethnicity data is necessary to address factors contributing to inequity in Covid-19 mortality.

Background

Alarming racial and ethnic disparities have been reported regarding risk of Covid-19 infection, access to testing, and adverse outcomes.1 Such disparities may be attributed to the disproportionate burden experienced by people of color regarding comorbidity, at-risk employment, unstable housing, incarceration, and decreased access to healthcare and medical resources. Unfortunately, as of mid-April, only half of states were reporting Covid-19 mortality by race and ethnicity, while Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Covid-19 data are missing race and ethnicity on 65% of patients.2,3

These incomplete data impact national estimates: the CDC data4, suggests that white patients represent a higher proportion of Covid-19 diagnoses than their representation in the general population.5 Yet data derived from specific regions that report race and ethnicity of Covid-19 decedents, show that Black patients are dying at a much higher rate than their population share. Other work has shown that counties with a disproportionately high Black population accounted for over half of all Covid-19 deaths while making up just 35% of the population.6

Among states that are reporting race and ethnicity data, the quality of the data and the magnitude of population-mortality disparities remain unclear. Further, the profound differences in population age distribution across racial and ethnic groups are infrequently incorporated into analyses. Given the strong relation between age and risk of Covid-related mortality, and the younger age distributions of the Black and Latinx populations, these unadjusted data can result in substantial underestimates of disparities. To address these gaps, we therefore evaluated the quality of race and ethnicity reporting in Covid-19 mortality data across states, and estimated age-adjusted disparities in population mortality rates.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional study using publicly-reported Covid-19 mortality data available on state websites2,7 as of April 21, 2020. We focused on Black, Latinx and white populations as they are the largest racial and ethnic groups represented in these data. State and county population demographics were obtained from 2017 United States Census estimates data8. New York State and New York City (NYC) report their data separately and were considered as distinct units for this study.

We used indirect standardization to assess the population mortality rate across racial and ethnic groups, accounting for the younger age distributions of the Latinx and Black populations.8,9 First, we determined the relative risk of Covid-19 death at the national level across age groups (<45, 45-54, 55-64, 65-74, and 75+ years old), based on CDC data.5 We then used these age-related relative risk data to estimate the relevant mortality rates for patients in each age/race/ethnic group by state, based on each state’s observed race and ethnicity-specific Covid-19 mortality rate. We used these rates to estimate the number of deaths that would be observed if each group had the same age distribution as the white population in that state, estimating the relative risk and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for each state and using a random effects meta-analytic approach to derive a reliable summary estimate of disparities.10 Finally, we conducted a meta-regression analysis to assess the association between state-level racial disparities (i.e. Black vs white mortality risk ratio, RR) and three state characteristics: percent of decedents missing race/ethnicity data, percent urban, and percent of state population Black/Latinx.

Results

We found that 28 states, and NYC, reported race and ethnicity-stratified Covid-19 mortality. There was substantial variation in the percent with missing race and ethnicity data, with only eight states missing such data on <5% of decedents (Figure 1). There was substantial variation in the association between Black race and mortality across states (Figure 2a). In 22 states (plus NYC), the risk of Covid-19 associated death was significantly higher for the Black than the white population, ranging as high as 18-fold higher in Wisconsin. In one state (Pennsylvania), the Black population had a significantly lower population mortality (RR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.24-0.69). When aggregating the data from all states (and NYC), the relative risk of death for Black compared to the white population was 3.57 (95% CI: 2.84-4.48).

Figure 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 1

Percent race/ethnicity information missing in COVID death data by State, April 21,2020

Figure 2a:
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 2a:

Covid-19 Related Mortality in Black vs White Populations by State*

Findings were similar for the Latinx population, which experienced an 88% higher risk of death than white patients (RR for Latinx vs White: 1.88: 1.61-2.19). In 12 states, as well as NYC, Latinx people had a significantly higher risk of Covid-related mortality than white people (Figure 2b). There were no states in which the Latinx population had a significantly lower mortality.

Figure 2b
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 2b

Covid-19 Related Population Mortality in Latinx vs White Populations by State*

In both analyses, the I-square was >90%, suggesting substantial heterogeneity across states in the magnitude of disparities. For the meta-regression analysis, we found that the percent of the population that was Black or Latinx, or percent urban, was not associated with the magnitude of disparities. However, states with higher proportion of deaths that were missing race data tended to have lower disparities (i.e, a lower Black vs white effect size; P=0.047)

Discussion

We found several findings that build upon prior work related to disparities in the Covid-19 pandemic in important ways. First, among states that are reporting race and ethnicity mortality data, we found a strong relation between Black race, Latinx ethnicity, and population-level Covid-19 mortality. Notably, we also found that the magnitude of these Covid-19 disparities varied substantially across states. While some states do not have demonstrable disparities, minorities in other states face 5 or 10-fold or higher risk of death than their white counterparts. Our findings also underscore the importance of adjusting for age differences across population groups, given that unadjusted mortality rates will underestimate disparities for younger population groups. In many states, the crude mortality rate for the Latinx population is lower than the white population; a disparity that reverses after considering age. Additionally, our study is the first to our knowledge to report the substantial variability in missingness of race/ethnicity data across states. This is crucial to correct, because poor quality data intrinsically limits our ability to conduct rigorous research that can provide critical insights on how best to target and evaluate public health and clinical interventions to reduce health disparities.

It is important to note that it is unclear whether underreporting of death related to Covd-19 occurs unequally across racial/ethnic groups. Future work should explore Covid-19 outcomes in other racial groups, as well as variability in the reporting of other relevant Covid-19 data including access to testing and infection rates. Additionally, we applied age-related mortality risks, derived from national data, to individual state data, due to the paucity of race/ethnicity/age-specific data for each state. However, when we compared our approach to a state that does report its own age-adjusted rates by race group, we found remarkably similar results: the relative risk for Black vs white age-adjusted mortality as estimated by New York State was 4.17 (compared to our estimate of 4.30). Finally, it is unclear how race and ethnicity are determined by each state. Ideally, the method should focus on how patients self-identified, which can be challenging during a pandemic, particularly in areas where coroners/mortuary staff are overwhelmed

Public health officials, healthcare systems, and policymakers should work together to improve the availability of high-quality and comprehensive race and ethnicity data, and to thoroughly investigate and mitigate factors that contribute to inequity in Covid-19 mortality.

Figure 2 Legend: *New York City is included as a separate region, as these data are reported distinctly from New York State data; SMR: Standardized Mortality Ratio for Black or Latinx in comparison to white population.

Data Availability

All data retrieved from publicly available sources

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid_weekly/

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/cases-updates/cases-in-us.html

https://ehe.amfar.org/disparities

https://covidtracking.com/data

https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-kits/2018/estimates-characteristics.html

Footnotes

  • Dr. Gross reported receiving research grants from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (funded by Pfizer and Astra-Zeneca), funding from Johnson & Johnson to assist with developing new approaches to sharing clinical trial data (through the Yale Open Data Access Project), and funding from Flatiron, Inc for travel/speaking, outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

  • The Authors would like to acknowledge Pamela Soulos, Jessica Long, Sophia Mun, Maureen Canavan for their assistance in abstracting and curating the relevant data.

References

  1. 1.↵
    Stafford KH, Meghan; Morrison, Aaron. Racial toll of virus grows even starker as more data emerges. Associated Press News 2020.
  2. 2.↵
    APM Research Lab Staff. The color of Coronovirus: Covid-19 deaths by race and ethnicity in the U.S Associated Press News 2020.
  3. 3.↵
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Provisional Death Counts for Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19): Data Updates by Select Demographic and Geographic Characteristics. 2020; https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covidweekly/.
  4. 4.↵
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Coronovirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) - Cases in the U.S. 2020; https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/cases-updates/cases-in-us.html. Accessed May 7, 2020.
  5. 5.↵
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Provisional Death Counts for Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19). 2020; https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covidl9/index.htm.
  6. 6.↵
    The Foundation for AIDS Research. COVID-19 Racial Disparities in U.S. Counties. 2020; https://ehe.amfar.org/disparities. Accessed May 7, 2020.
  7. 7.↵
    The COVID Tracking Project. Most recent data. 2020; https://covidtracking.com/data, 2020.
  8. 8.↵
    U.S. Census Bureau PD. Annual State Resident Population Estimates for 5 Race Groups (5 Race Alone or in Combination Groups) by Age, Sex, and Hispanic Origin: April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2017. 2018; https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-kits/2018/estimates-characteristics.html. Accessed April 23, 2020, 2020.
  9. 9.↵
    Swift MB. Simple confidence intervals for standardized rates based on the approximate bootstrap method. Statistics in medicine. 1995;14(17):1875–1888.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    Vandenbroucke JP. A shortcut method for calculating the 95 per cent confidence interval of the standardized mortality ratio. American Journal of Epidemiology. 1982;115(2):303–304.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted May 11, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Population Level Covid-19 Mortality
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Population Level Covid-19 Mortality
Cary P. Gross, Utibe R. Essien, Saamir Pasha, Jacob R Gross, Shi-yi Wang, Marcella Nunez-Smith
medRxiv 2020.05.07.20094250; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.07.20094250
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Population Level Covid-19 Mortality
Cary P. Gross, Utibe R. Essien, Saamir Pasha, Jacob R Gross, Shi-yi Wang, Marcella Nunez-Smith
medRxiv 2020.05.07.20094250; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.07.20094250

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Epidemiology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)