Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

A Double Power Law model accurately forecasts COVID-19 transmission and mortality

Vladimir A. Osherovich, Joseph Fainberg, Lev Z. Osherovich
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.07.20094714
Vladimir A. Osherovich
1NASA/GSFC/CUA Code 673, Greenbelt, MD 20771, US, Email:
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Vladimir.Osherovich{at}gmail.com
Joseph Fainberg
2NASA/GSFC Emeritus, Code 673, Greenbelt, MD 20771, US, Email:
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: fainberg{at}jhu.edu
Lev Z. Osherovich
3Versant Ventures (Switzerland) GmbH, Aeschenvorstadt 36, Basel 4051 Switzerland, Email:
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: lev.osherovich{at}gmail.com losherovich{at}versantventures.com
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

The novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 appeared at the end of 2019, spreading rapidly and causing a severe respiratory syndrome (COVID-19) with high mortality. Until a vaccine or therapy is found, the most effective method of prophylaxis has been to minimize transmission through mandatory social distancing and restriction of all but essential economic activity. A key question facing policy makers and individuals is when to resume economic and social activity in the face of persistent community transmission of SARS-CoV-2. To help address this question, we have developed a mathematical model of transmission and mortality of COVID-19 in countries that have implemented stringent social distancing measures. Using data from Italy, Spain, Switzerland and Germany on SARS-CoV-2 transmission, active caseload and mortality, we model the rapid rise and slow decay (“long tail”) of the COVID-19 pandemic using a first order nonlinear differential equation. The prognostic utility of our model is validated by strong correspondence between predicted and prospectively observed data up to eight weeks after curve fitting. This Double Power Law model can be applied to other countries as a predictive tool to inform policy decisions concerning social distancing.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

No external funding was received to support this work.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

This work is an analysis of epidemiological data and thus does not require IRB oversight.

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • - revisions for clarity - additional data on case incidence and mortality

Data Availability

Data is drawn from Johns Hopkins Coronavirus Resource Center and compiled on https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/

https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted October 23, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A Double Power Law model accurately forecasts COVID-19 transmission and mortality
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
A Double Power Law model accurately forecasts COVID-19 transmission and mortality
Vladimir A. Osherovich, Joseph Fainberg, Lev Z. Osherovich
medRxiv 2020.05.07.20094714; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.07.20094714
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
A Double Power Law model accurately forecasts COVID-19 transmission and mortality
Vladimir A. Osherovich, Joseph Fainberg, Lev Z. Osherovich
medRxiv 2020.05.07.20094714; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.07.20094714

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Epidemiology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)