Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Correlation Between Blood and CSF Compartment Cytokines and Chemokines in Subjects with Cryptococcal Meningitis

View ORCID ProfileElizabeth C Okafor, Katherine H Hullsiek, Darlisha A Williams, James E Scriven, Joshua Rhein, Henry W Nabeta, Abdu K Musubire, Radha Rajasingham, Conrad Muzoora, Charlotte Schutz, Graeme Meintjes, David B Meya, David R Boulware
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.08.20095232
Elizabeth C Okafor
1Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, 55455 Minneapolis, MN, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Elizabeth C Okafor
  • For correspondence: okafo039{at}umn.edu
Katherine H Hullsiek
2School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, 55455 Minneapolis, MN, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Darlisha A Williams
1Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, 55455 Minneapolis, MN, USA
3Infectious Diseases Institute, Makerere University, P.O. Box 22418 Kampala, Uganda
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James E Scriven
4Wellcome Centre for Infectious Diseases Research in Africa, Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine, and Department of Medicine, Observatory 7925 University of Cape Town, South Africa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joshua Rhein
1Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, 55455 Minneapolis, MN, USA
3Infectious Diseases Institute, Makerere University, P.O. Box 22418 Kampala, Uganda
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Henry W Nabeta
3Infectious Diseases Institute, Makerere University, P.O. Box 22418 Kampala, Uganda
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Abdu K Musubire
3Infectious Diseases Institute, Makerere University, P.O. Box 22418 Kampala, Uganda
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Radha Rajasingham
1Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, 55455 Minneapolis, MN, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Conrad Muzoora
5Department of Medicine, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 1410 Mbarara, Uganda
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Charlotte Schutz
4Wellcome Centre for Infectious Diseases Research in Africa, Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine, and Department of Medicine, Observatory 7925 University of Cape Town, South Africa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Graeme Meintjes
4Wellcome Centre for Infectious Diseases Research in Africa, Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine, and Department of Medicine, Observatory 7925 University of Cape Town, South Africa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David B Meya
1Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, 55455 Minneapolis, MN, USA
3Infectious Diseases Institute, Makerere University, P.O. Box 22418 Kampala, Uganda
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David R Boulware
1Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, 55455 Minneapolis, MN, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Background Though peripheral blood is a crucial sample to study immunology, it is unclear whether the immune environment in the peripheral vasculature correlates with that at the endorgan site of infection. Utilizing cryptococcal meningitis as a model, we investigated the correlation between serum and cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers over time.

Methods We analyzed the cerebrospinal fluid and serum of 160 subjects presenting with first episode cryptococcal meningitis for soluble cytokines and chemokines measured by Luminex assay. Specimens were collected at meningitis diagnosis, 1-week, and 2-weeks post cryptococcal diagnosis. We compared paired samples by Spearman correlation and the p-value was set at <0.01.

Results Of the 21 analytes tested at baseline, there was no correlation detected between nearly all analytes. A weak negative correlation was found between serum and cerebrospinal fluid levels of interferon-gamma (Rho= −0.214, p= .007) and interleukin-4 (Rho= −0.232, p=. 003). There was no correlation at 1-week post cryptococcal diagnosis. However, at 2-weeks post diagnosis, there was a weak positive correlation between levels of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (Rho= 0.25, p= .007) between serum and cerebrospinal fluid. No cytokine or chemokine showed consistent correlation overtime.

Conclusion Based on our analysis of 21 biomarkers, serum and cerebrospinal fluid immune responses do not correlate. There appears to be a distinct immune environment in terms of soluble biomarkers in the vasculature versus end-organ site of infection. While this is a model of HIV-related cryptococcal meningitis, we postulate that assuming the blood compartment is representative of the immune function at the end-organ site of infection may not be appropriate.

INTRODUCTION

Immunologic investigations are critical to understanding the pathogenesis of infectious disease. Often human or animal subjects have their blood drawn to assess cell phenotype, function, or soluble cytokines or chemokines in order to characterize the immune response to infection. Blood is a convenient and available compartment to analyze. However, it is unclear if analysis of cells trafficking in the peripheral vasculature reflects the actual immune response at the end organ site compartment (e.g. CSF in meningitis, lung in pneumonia). This is important because the end organ site of infection is often the primary site from which initial or disease-specific signs and symptoms manifest. Of even more concern is the possibility of unknowingly overestimating or underestimating the immune response based on analysis of immune cells in the vasculature.

Analysis of site-specific immune responses in humans is difficult but not impossible. Cryptococcal meningitis is one model which allows investigation of the compartment-specific immune responses. In cryptococcal meningitis, frequent therapeutic lumbar punctures to control intracranial pressure provide a large volume of CSF over the course of treatment. Analysis of CSF provides information about the immune responses in the central nervous system (CNS). Yet, cryptococcal meningitis is not solely a localized CNS infection, but a systemic infection whereby inhaled cryptococcal spores germinate in the lung and yeast cells disseminate via the blood throughout the body [1, 2]. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells, serum, and plasma provide information about immune responses in the peripheral vascular compartment.

In cryptococcosis, but more broadly in infectious disease, the correlation between the immune response in the peripheral vasculature versus immune response in the end-organ compartment is poorly characterized. The objective of the present analysis is to determine the correlation between 21 peripheral blood and CSF cytokines and chemokines in a cohort of subjects with first episode cryptococcosis. In addition, we report the correlation results over time using three distinct timepoints during the course of cryptococcosis treatment. The results from this analysis identifies similarities and differences in the immune responses, particularly soluble cytokines and chemokines, in tissue compartments by using cryptococcal meningitis as a representative model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Subjects with first episode of cryptococcal meningitis were originally enrolled in the Cryptococcal Optimal ART Timing (COAT) trial from November 2010 to April 2012 to determine the optimal time to initiate antiretrovirals after cryptococcal meningitis [3]. The COAT trial was conducted at: Mulago Hospital, Kampala, Uganda; Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda; and the former G.F. Jooste Hospital in Cape Town, South Africa. All subjects completed written informed consent and the institutional review board from each organization approved the study protocol. Details regarding this study trial have been previously described (Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier No: NCT01075152) [3].

We collected peripheral blood and CSF samples at cryptococcal meningitis diagnosis, trial randomization at 1-week, and 2-weeks post cryptococcal meningitis diagnosis. The samples were processed and stored at −80 and then shipped to the University of Minnesota for analysis. Samples did not undergo any prior freeze thaws. Serum and CSF were analyzed in a T cell and macrophage targeted multiplex panel for 19 cytokines and chemokines using a Luminex multiplex cytokine panel (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) [4], following the manufacturer’s instructions being run at 1:2 dilution taking the average of two replicates. We also measured CD14 and CD163 by ELISA (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN). We have previously reported the longitudinal CSF changes by early vs late ART treatment [4].

To assess the correlation between intra-subject matched serum and CSF cytokines we log transformed the raw readout and subsequently used a non-parametric Spearman correlation test. Data at each time point represents all subjects included in the previous study irrespective of trial arm randomization. Changes in cohort size represents fluctuations in specimen availability, most often due to subjects who declined therapeutic lumbar punctures or subjects who unfortunately died. Significance was set at a p-value of 0.01 to adjust for multiple comparisons in a post-hoc exploratory analysis.

RESULTS

Of 177 ART-naïve subjects with first episode of cryptococcal meningitis enrolled into the COAT trial, matching CSF and serum existed for 160 subjects at baseline, 105 subjects at 1- week, and 115 subjects at 2-weeks. Missing specimens were most often due to lack of CSF collection on the same day as serum collection as subjects could refuse therapeutic lumbar punctures. Clinical and demographic data comparing COAT trial arms early versus late ART initiation have been previously described [4]. Of the160 subjects included in this analysis, 79 subjects (49%) were female. The median age was 35 (interquartile range (IQR) 28.5 to 40) years with a median CD4 count of 25 (IQR 10 to 74) cells/μL determined at 1-week post diagnosis.

We assessed whether there was a correlation between immune biomarkers in CSF versus serum for 21 analytes irrespective of study arm randomization. At time of diagnosis, none of the 21 immune biomarkers had a positive correlation by Spearman’s non-parametric test (Table 1). Two analytes had statistically significant but weak negative correlations; the type 1 T-helper cell (Th1) cytokine interferon-gamma (IFN-γ, Rho= −0.214, p=.007) and the type 2 T-helper cell cytokine (Th2) interleukin-4 (IL-4, Rho= −0.232, p=.003). While statistically significant, the correlations were relatively weak and inverse for both IFN-γ and IL-4 (Figure 1), meaning as blood levels increased, CSF levels decreased.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 1: Correlation of Paired CSF and Serum Analytes at Baseline, 1-Week, and 2-Weeks post Cryptococcal Meningitis Diagnosis
Figure 1:
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 1: Scatterplot of Interferon-Gamma (IFN-γ) and Interleukin-4 (IL-4) at Cryptococcal Meningitis in CSF Versus Serum

Of the 19 biomarkers analyzed among 105 paired samples at 1-week post cryptococcal meningitis diagnosis, no cytokines or chemokines were statistically correlated. Of the 21 biomarkers analyzed at 2-weeks post diagnosis among 115 paired samples, a weak positive correlation existed between serum and CSF levels of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF, Rho=0.25, p=.007). Across the three time points as subjects continued standard antifungal therapy, GM-CSF was the only cytokine with a significant correlation between blood and CSF (Rho= 0.147, p=0.003) (Table 2). Additionally, analysis of rate of change over time, through slope calculation across all three time points, demonstrated no significant positive or negative correlation between blood and CSF (Table 2).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 2. Correlation of CSF and Serum Cytokines Pooled Across All Three Time Points at Baseline, 1-Week, and 2-Weeks post Cryptococcal Meningitis Diagnosis

DISCUSSION

We hypothesized that immune biomarkers would have a general positive correlation between serum and CSF. Surprisingly, we found no consistent correlation between soluble immune biomarkers in the peripheral vasculature versus at the site of infection in the CSF. The cytokine environment was strikingly different, even though cryptococcosis is a disseminated infection throughout the vasculature, lungs, and CNS [2, 5, 6]. Additionally, no single analyte had a significant correlation pattern over the course of the first two weeks of standard antifungal therapy. The results from this focused analysis provide evidence that peripheral blood analytes are not necessarily similar to CSF analytes. This builds upon our previous findings which demonstrated that lymphocyte populations and activation levels in CSF are distinct from peripheral blood [7].

There is a large body of published literature comparing human peripheral blood and CSF cytokines and chemokines across various infectious etiologies of meningitis. Comparatively, little literature has been published regarding the correlation within the same individuals’ between human tissue compartments and peripheral blood analytes in infectious etiologies of meningitis [8] or other conditions. Additionally, prior to this study, there was no literature characterizing CSF and blood analyte correlations over time in subjects with cryptococcal meningitis.

Employing cryptococcal meningitis as a model of compartmentalization, we raise a fundamental question of whether the immunology observed in peripheral blood represents what occurs at the end-organ site of infection. This is particularly important as the infectious disease field continues to consider the potential benefits and risks of immunomodulating agent adjuvant therapy, such as administration of proinflammatory cytokines and/or monoclonal antibodies to inhibit anti-inflammatory cytokines or exhaustion receptor engagement. Therefore, it is crucial to truly understand the immune environment at the end-organ site of infection.

The effector immune response at the site of infection appears to be very different from that of cells trafficking in blood. Previous studies on cryptococcal meningitis immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome documented differential expression of leukocyte phenotype when comparing peripheral blood to the CSF [7]. We doubt these findings are unique to cryptococcosis, for example as demonstrated by differential gene expression when comparing pericardial fluid to peripheral blood in subjects with pericardial tuberculosis [9]. There is also the potential impact of tissue niche on leukocyte activation and cytokine environment.

Research on compartmentalization in infection is limited and thus characterizing the immune response in peripheral blood vs end-organ compartments should be rigorously assessed in other localized infections.

Our study is restricted to immunocompromised persons with cryptococcosis, thus whether the lack of correlation between tissue-specific and peripheral vasculature compartment immune responses is universal, requires future study. Additionally, the repertoire of cytokines and chemokines tested in this analysis include those generated by several T cells subsets, particularly Th1 and Th2 effector T cells, that have been implicated in favorable and detrimental outcomes respectfully in mice with cryptococcal meningitis [10, 11]. The panel also includes several molecules important for macrophage activation and polarization [12] as it has been demonstrated that M1 macrophage polarization enhances cryptococcus clearance [13]. Though larger cytokine and chemokine panels are available, this targeted panel includes important analytes that have been consistently studied in cryptococcal meningitis. Therefore, this panel may require modification when analyzing tissue-specific immune responses in other disease states.

It is plausible that participants’ study arm randomization to early or late ART, based on parent clinical trial, could have affected cytokine responses. However, all participants in the parent clinical trial irrespective of study arm randomization, were included in this analysis if CSF and serum compartment matched samples from the same individual were available for analysis. Therefore, it is unlikely that study arm randomization could impact our intra-person correlation analysis. Though 160 subjects were included in the baseline analysis, our data are limited by the absence of 35% and 30% of study participants’ specimens at 1 and 2 weeks, respectively. However, we postulate that more specimens would not have changed the generally poor strength of the correlations. The strength of correlations for all analytes was generally weak with Rho correlation coefficient ranging from −0.23 to +0.25. Thousands of specimens may have been able to generate a statistically significant p-value, but the correlations were weak. Additionally, a more stringent and formal p-value calculation, (for example Bonferroni correction or Benjamini-Hochberg procedure) would not have changed the overall weak correlation.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, we demonstrate that cytokines and chemokines released upon leukocyte activation do not correlate between serum and CSF in cryptococcal meningitis. This demonstrates that, though readily available, utilizing peripheral blood as an approximation for the immune status in tissue compartments, such as the CNS, is potentially unreliable.

Data Availability

All relevant data is included in the manuscript.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings in this study are available upon request sent to the corresponding author.

Potential Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Funding Statement

This research was supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01NS086312, U01AI125003, T32AI055433, K23AI138851), National Institute of Neurologic Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) and Fogarty International Center (R01NS086312, K01TW010268, K43TW010718).

Disclaimer

The findings from this project have not been previously presented at any conferences and is not being considered for publication by another journal at this time.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the medical officers, nurses, and laboratory staff who were a part of the COAT Study Team. Additionally, we express our deepest gratitude to all study participants, healthcare professionals, and laboratory staff at all study sites.

Footnotes

  • Alternate: David Boulware boulw001{at}umn.edu

References

  1. 1.↵
    Coelho C, Bocca AL, Casadevall A. The Intracellular Life of Cryptococcus neoformans. Annu Rev Pathol 2014; 9: 219-38.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    Denham ST, Brown JCS. Mechanisms of Pulmonary Escape and Dissemination by Cryptococcus neoformans. Journal of Fungi 2018; 4(25).
  3. 3.↵
    Boulware DR, Meya DB, Muzoora C, et al. Timing of antiretroviral therapy after diagnosis of cryptococcal meningitis. N Engl J Med 2014; 370(26): 2487–98.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    Scriven JE, Rhein J, Hullsiek KH, et al. Early ART after cryptococcal meningitis is associated with cerebrospinal fluid pleocytosis and macrophage activation in a multisite randomized trial. J Infect Dis 2015; 212(5): 769–78.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    Vanherp L, Ristani A, Poelmans J, et al. Sensitive bioluminescence imaging of fungal dissemination to the brain in mouse models of cryptococcosis. Dis Model Mech 2019; 12(6): dmm039123.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    Nicola AM, Robertson EJ, Albuquerque P, Derengowski LdS, Casadevalla A. Nonlytic Exocytosis of Cryptococcus neoformans from Macrophages Occurs In Vivo and Is Influenced by Phagosomal pH. mBio 2011; 2(4): e00167-11.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    Meya DB, Okurut S, Zziwa G, et al. Cellular immune activation in cerebrospinal fluid from ugandans with cryptococcal meningitis and immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome. J Infect Dis 2015; 211(10): 1597–606.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    Fassbender K, Schminke U, Ries S, et al. Endothelial-derived adhesion molecules in bacterial meningitis: association to cytokine release and intrathecal leukocyte-recruitment. J Neuroimmunol 1997; 74(1-2): 130-4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    Matthews K, Deffur A, Ntsekhe M, et al. A Compartmentalized Profibrotic Immune Response Characterizes Pericardial Tuberculosis, Irrespective of HIV-1 Infection. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2015; 192(12): 1518–21.
    OpenUrl
  10. 10.↵
    Wiesner DL, Specht CA, Lee CK, et al. Chitin Recognition via Chitotriosidase Promotes Pathologic Type-2 Helper T Cells Responses to Cryptococcal Infection. PLoS Pathogens 2015; 11(3): e1004701.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    Müller U, Stenzel W, Köhler G, et al. IL-13 Induces Disease-Promoting type 2 Cytokines, Alternatively Activated Macropahges adn Allergic Inflammation during Pulmonary Infection of Mice with Cryptococcus neoformans. J immunol 2007; 179: 5367-55377.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    Chiller T, Farrokhshad K, Brummer E, Stevens DA. Effect of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor on polymorphonuclear neutrophils, monocytes or monocyte-derived macrophages combined with voriconazole against Cryptococcus neoformans. Medical Mycology 2002; 40: 21-6.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    Hardison SE, Ravi S, Wozniak KL, Young ML, Olszewski MA, , Jr FLW. Pulmonary Infection with an Interferon-gamma Producing Cryptococcus neoformans Strain Results in Classical Macrophage Activation and Protection. Am J Pathol 2010, 2010; 176(2): 774–85.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted September 29, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Correlation Between Blood and CSF Compartment Cytokines and Chemokines in Subjects with Cryptococcal Meningitis
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Correlation Between Blood and CSF Compartment Cytokines and Chemokines in Subjects with Cryptococcal Meningitis
Elizabeth C Okafor, Katherine H Hullsiek, Darlisha A Williams, James E Scriven, Joshua Rhein, Henry W Nabeta, Abdu K Musubire, Radha Rajasingham, Conrad Muzoora, Charlotte Schutz, Graeme Meintjes, David B Meya, David R Boulware
medRxiv 2020.05.08.20095232; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.08.20095232
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Correlation Between Blood and CSF Compartment Cytokines and Chemokines in Subjects with Cryptococcal Meningitis
Elizabeth C Okafor, Katherine H Hullsiek, Darlisha A Williams, James E Scriven, Joshua Rhein, Henry W Nabeta, Abdu K Musubire, Radha Rajasingham, Conrad Muzoora, Charlotte Schutz, Graeme Meintjes, David B Meya, David R Boulware
medRxiv 2020.05.08.20095232; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.08.20095232

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • HIV/AIDS
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)