ABSTRACT
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy has achieved considerable success in treating B-cell hematologic malignancies. However, the challenges of extending CAR-T therapy to other tumor types, particularly solid tumors, remain appreciable. There are substantial variabilities in CAR-T cellular kinetics across CAR-designs, CAR-T products, dosing regimens, patient responses, disease types, tumor burdens, and lymphodepletion conditions. As a “living drug”, CAR-T cellular kinetics typically exhibit four distinct phases: distribution, expansion, contraction, and persistence. The cellular kinetics of CAR-T may correlate with patient responses, but which factors determine CAR-T cellular kinetics remain poorly defined. Herein, we developed a cellular kinetic model to retrospectively characterize CAR-T kinetics in 217 patients from 7 trials and compared CAR-T kinetics across response status, patient populations, and tumor types. Based on our analysis results, CAR-T cells exhibited a significantly higher cell proliferation rate and capacity but a lower contraction rate in patients who responded to treatment. CAR-T cells proliferate to a higher degree in hematologic malignancies than in solid tumors. Within the assessed dose ranges (107–109 cells), CAR-T doses were weakly correlated with CAR-T cellular kinetics and patient response status. In conclusion, the developed CAR-T cellular kinetic model adequately characterized the multiphasic CAR-T cellular kinetics and supported systematic evaluations of the potential influencing factors, which can have significant implications for the development of more effective CAR-T therapies.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
It is a meta-analysis of multiple trial's data
Funding Statement
National Institute of Health (GM119661) and Janssen R&D
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
we analyzed data from published trials that have followed the relevant ethical guidance.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All the data analyzed in this manuscript was from the published literature, which were all cited in the manuscript.
