Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Evaluation of the US governors’ decision when to issue stay-at-home orders

View ORCID ProfileBenjamin Djulbegovic, David J. Weiss, Iztok Hozo
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.14.20093633
Benjamin Djulbegovic
aDepartment of Supportive Care Medicine, City of Hope, 1500 East Duarte Rd, Duarte, CA
bDepartment of Hematology, City of Hope, 1500 East Duarte Rd, Duarte, CA
cEvidence-based Analytics and Comparative Effectiveness Research, City of Hope, 1500 East Duarte Rd, Duarte, CA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Benjamin Djulbegovic
  • For correspondence: bdjulbegovic{at}coh.org
David J. Weiss
dDepartment of Psychology, California State University, Los Angeles, CA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Iztok Hozo
eDepartment of Mathematics, Indiana University, Gary, IN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Objectives To evaluate if the US governors’ decision to issue the stay-at-home orders reflects the classic Weber-Fechner law of psychophysics, the amount by which a stimulus (such as number of cases or deaths) must increase in order to be noticed-the “just noticeable difference”-as a fraction of the intensity of that stimulus.

Design A prospective observational study using data on the daily number of infected patients and deaths from the New York Times daily database.

Setting 50 States and the District of Columbia

Participants All individuals judged to be positive for the coronavirus or to have died from COVID19.

Main outcome measures Number of people diagnosed with or died from COVID19.

Results We found that the decision to issue the state-at-home order reflects the Weber-Fechner law of psychophysics. Both the number of infections (p=<0.0001; R2=0.79) and deaths (p<0.0001; R2=0.63) were highly statistically significantly associated with the decision to issue the stay-at-home orders. The results indicate that for each doubling of infections or deaths within their state, an additional four to six governors will issue the stay-at-home order. We also observed a clear dose-response relationship in the Cox model: the larger the number of cases, or deaths, the higher the probability that the stay-at-home order will be made. When the number of deaths reached 256 or the number of infected people was greater than 16,384, the probability of issuing a “stay-at-home” order was close to 100%.

Conclusions When there are not clearly articulated rules to follow, decision-makers in times of crisis such as COVID19 resort to use of simple heuristics consistent with the Weber-Fechner law of psychophysics. The findings are important for the public to understand how their elected officials make important public health decisions.

Strengths and limitations of this study

  • The study was based on individual, publicly available patient data accessible to both researchers and policy-makers.

  • The US governors seemed to be wired to act according to the Weber-Fechner law of psychophysics

  • The Weber-Fechner function explained 60-80% of the variance in the governors’ decisions. Typically, explanatory factors in decision-making fields capture at best 30% of such variance.

  • The accuracy of data and reporting practices could not be independently verified.

  • We demonstrated an association but not a causal relation-we have identified the stimulus that underlies the decision, but we do not know why some governors acted more quickly than others.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

No formal funding support was available for this study

Author Declarations

All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.

Yes

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

Data for the analysis reported in the paper are publicly available

https://github.com/nytimes/covid-19-data

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted May 18, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Evaluation of the US governors’ decision when to issue stay-at-home orders
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Evaluation of the US governors’ decision when to issue stay-at-home orders
Benjamin Djulbegovic, David J. Weiss, Iztok Hozo
medRxiv 2020.05.14.20093633; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.14.20093633
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Evaluation of the US governors’ decision when to issue stay-at-home orders
Benjamin Djulbegovic, David J. Weiss, Iztok Hozo
medRxiv 2020.05.14.20093633; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.14.20093633

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Health Policy
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)