Abstract
Objective To investigate clinical and radiological features of olfactory clefts of patients with mild coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
Methods Sixteen COVID-19 patients were recruited. The epidemiological and clinical data were extracted. Nasal complaints were assessed through the sino-nasal outcome test 22 (SNOT-22). Patients underwent psychophysical olfactory testing, olfactory cleft examination and CT-scan.
Results Sixteen anosmic patients were included. The mean Sniffin’Sticks score was 4.6±1.7. The majority of patients had no endoscopical abnormality, with a mean olfactory cleft endoscopy score of 0.6±0.9. The olfactory clefts were opacified in 3 patients on the CT-scan. The mean radiological olfactory cleft score was 0.7±0.8. There were no significant correlations between clinical, radiological and psychophysical olfactory testing.
Conclusion The olfactory cleft of anosmic COVID-19 patients is free regarding endoscopic examination and imaging. The anosmia etiology would be not related to edema of the olfactory cleft.
Level of Evidence 4
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
IJB-0M011-3137
Funding Statement
none
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Funding: FRMH & UMONS Grants.
Conflict of interest statement: The authors have no conflicts of interest
Data Availability
Data available with corresponding author approval
