Abstract
Objectives Emergency departments (EDs) are complex adaptive systems and improving patient flow requires understanding how ED processes work. This is important for developing countries where flow concerns are compounded by resource constraints. The Caribbean is one region with developing emergency care systems and limited research in the area. This study aimed to explore the patient flow process in an emergency department in Trinidad and Tobago, identifying organizational factors influencing patient flow.
Methods Multiple qualitative methods, including non-participant observations, observational process mapping and informal conversational interviews were used to explore patient flow. The process maps were generated from the observational process mapping. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the data.
Setting The study was conducted at a major tertiary level emergency department in Trinidad and Tobago.
Participants Patient and staff journeys in the emergency department were observed.
Results Six broad categories were identified-1) ED organizational work processes, 2) ED design and layout, 3) material resources, 4) nursing staff levels, roles, skill mix and use 5) non-clinical ED staff and 6) external clinical and non-clinical departments. The study findings were combined with existing literature to produce a model of factors influencing ED patient flow. Barriers and facilitators to patient flow were highlighted.
Conclusion The knowledge gained may be used to strengthen the emergency care system in the local context. The model of ED patient flow may be used to systematically examine factors influencing patient flow, informing policy and practice. However, the study findings should be validated in other settings.
Strengths and limitations of this study Previous studies have been predominantly conducted in developed countries using quantitative methods
Strengthening emergency care systems is becoming a priority in developing countries but the Caribbean remains an under-represented region.
This study explores ED patient flow in a developing Caribbean country using a multi-method qualitative design, primarily observational process mapping
Single observer used to collect data
Singe site may produce context specific findings
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
No funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The University of the West Indies Campus Ethics Committee and the hospital site granted ethical approval (CEC014/09/16).
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The data is in the form of confidential observations and interviews and is not available for data sharing
