Abstract
Background Emergency general surgery (EGS) diseases carry a substantial public health burden, accounting for over 3 million admissions annually. Due to their time-sensitive nature, ensuring adequate access to EGS services is critical for reducing patient morbidity and mortality. Travel-time alone, without consideration of resource supply and demand, may be insufficient to determine a regional health care system’s ability to provide timely access to EGS care. Spatial Access Ratio (SPAR) incorporates travel-time, as well as hospital-specific resources and capacity, to determine healthcare accessibility which may be more appropriate for surgical specialties. We therefore compared SPAR to travel-time in their ability to differentiate spatial access to EGS care for vulnerable populations.
Methods We constructed a Geographic Information Science (GIS) platform using existing road networks, and mapped population location, race and socioeconomic characteristics, as well as all EGS-capable hospitals in California. We then compared the shortest travel time method to the gravity-based SPAR in their ability to identify disparities in spatial access for the population as a whole, and subsequently to describe socio-demographic disparities. Reduced spatial access was defined at > 60 minutes travel time, or lowest three classes of SPAR.
Results 283 EGS-capable hospitals were mapped, 142 (50%) of which had advanced resources. Using shortest travel time, 36.98M people (94.8%) were within 20-minutes driving time to any EGS capable hospital, and 33.49M (85.9%) to an advanced-resourced center. Only 166, 950 (0.4%) experienced prolonged (>60 minutes) travel time to any EGS-capable hospital, which increased to 1.05M (2.7%) for advanced-resources. Using SPAR, 11.5M (29.5%) of people had reduced spatial access to any EGS hospital, which increased to 13.9M (35.7%) when evaluating advanced-resource hospitals. The greatest disparities in spatial access to care were found for rural residents and Native Americans for both overall and advanced EGS services.
Conclusions While travel time and SPAR showed similar overall patterns of spatial access to EGS-capable hospitals, SPAR showed greater differentiation of spatial access across the state. Nearly one-third of California residents have limited or poor access to EGS hospitals, with the greatest disparities noted for Native American and rural residents. These findings argue for the use of gravity-based models such as SPAR that incorporate measures of population demand and hospital capacity when assessing spatial access to surgical services, and have implications for the allocation of healthcare resources to address disparities.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Dr McCrum was supported by funding from the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) Research and Education Scholarship and the National Institute of Health (Grant #R21MD012657).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study was reviewed by the University of Utah Institutional Review Board and received exempt status.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its supplementary materials.
