Understanding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on well-being and virtual care for people living with dementia and care partners living in the community

Introduction

With the emergence of COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) as a novel coronavirus in late 2019, a global pandemic has led to varying levels of social distancing restrictions across the world. This includes restrictions on public gatherings, the conduct of businesses, the accessibility of healthcare, and movement outside the home.

The unintended consequences of these measures may included disrupted routines for people living with dementia, increased stress on care partners as they manage the demands of caring for someone living with dementia, and difficulty satisfying essential needs such as obtaining groceries and medications without the typical social and health service support, or support from personal networks. These measures have the potential to cause social isolation, which is increasingly recognized to be detrimental to overall well-being (Vernooij-Dassen & Jeon, 2016; Ward et al., 2018) Well-being requires deep and meaningful human connections, health status above an expected baseline, positive interpersonal expectations, and a sense of self (Feeney & Collins, 2015). Maintaining well-being is a key component of person-centered dementia care (Kitwood, 1997). Moreover, the rapid move to virtual care provision may influence how and when people access treatment from healthcare providers, in addition to how providers can continue to provide high quality care in new virtual settings.

Multiple professional organizations including Alzheimer’s Disease International (2020) have issued emergent COVID-related advice for persons with living with dementia, but so far these recommendations have been based on little evidence, rarely collected systematically.To begin building an evidence base for the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on well-being and healthcare of persons living with dementia, we conducted a qualitative study of persons living with dementia and care partners receiving community-based care at a dementia specialty clinic. A qualitative approach was used to collect rich data on lived experience that incorporated a reflexive thematic approach to content analysis.

Research Design

We completed remote, in depth interviews using telephone with family members or care partners, as well as the person with dementia if they wished to and were able to provide consent. In order for participants to provide detail on the changes and impacts of the pandemic on their lives it is important that these data ae collected while the pandemic is occurring and while social distancing measures are in place.

Data Collection

In depth interviews were used as they are an appropriate way to gain a robust understanding of lived experience and allow for exploration of topics that are important to the participant, maintaining a participatory approach to working with people living with dementia and care partners. An interview guide was created asking general questions about experiences of isolation due to the pandemic and virtual health care experiences, and was tested and updated after the first two interviews to act as pilots. It was anticipated that theoretical saturation of participant experiences would be achieved after completion of 15–20 interviews and so a target of recruiting 20 participants was initially determined. In depth interviews were audio-recorded and field notes were taken during the interviews in a dedicated field journal, along with reflexive field notes written directly after the interviews. Demographic data was also recorded and was available through the current registry, and information on whether the participants had contracted Covid-19 or were tested for SARS-CoV 2 was collected by interview. To collect the planned sample size of 20 completed interviews, we contacted 45 people of whom 21 consented and completed the interview. Interviews ranged in duration from 8m:33s to 34m:38s (mean length = 21m:12s) and all interviews were completed over the phone as per participant request. Interviews were conducted between April 23 and May 21, 2020, with recruitment and data collection completed by KF, AZ and EC, all research staff with extensive experience working with people living with dementia. The interviewers were unknown to the participants at the time of interview but introduced themselves and the reason for the work at initial contact and at the time of interview.

In Canada, provincial governments are primarily responsible for implementing public health measures for pandemics. A timeline of provincial measures for social distancing and health system reorganization was created by review of public records of the City of Calgary and government of Alberta, communications from Alberta Health Services (the single public healthcare system in Alberta that manages the Cognitive Neurosciences Clinic), and the Calgary Herald newspaper (Calgary, Canada). From March 4 onwards, the provincial Chief Medical Officer of Health conducted daily briefings on virus activity and the government response. The Cognitive Neurosciences Clinic ceased routine in-person visits on March 13 and virtual care appointments for the regular attendees of the Cognitive Neurosciences Clinic were implemented on March 14, 2020. A timeline of public health measures implemented by the government of Alberta is shown inFigure 1.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 1: Timeline of COVID-19 Public Health Response in Alberta, Canada

Results

Discussion

This study provides early evidence of the impact of COVID-19 on persons living with dementia and their care partners. These interviews identified multiple adverse consequences of the public health measures implemented to contain spread of SARS-CoV-2, including loss of informal caregiving, lack of access to health care, and social isolation, contributing to burn out symptoms among care partners. This validates the concerns expressed by multiple advocacy organizations (such as the Alzheimer Society of Canada, Alzheimer’s Association (USA), and Alzheimer’s Disease International), which although well founded have nonetheless been based on anecdotes or speculation without data collected directly from persons living with dementia. Our data were collected during a period of “lockdown” when all non-essential businesses were closed, health clinic access was mandated to be online or telephone except for emergencies, and most in-person home care services were no longer being provided. Therefore, it provides a snapshot of the adverse effects of the aggressive public health efforts that were needed to “flatten the curve” to prevent health system collapse. These drastic public health measures, while being lightened in many jurisdictions, may yet be required in other countries at an earlier stage of the pandemic or in case of a second wave of viral infections in the Northern hemisphere in the fall.

So far, there are few data on the impact of COVID-19 on dementia care even though it is well understood that older people with medical comorbidities are at much higher risk of fatal infection. In a letter in the Lancet, physicians from Wuhan province cited multiple barriers to good dementia care including difficulty adhering to social distancing and good hygiene, loss of services, and difficulty accessing telemedicine (Wang et al., 2020). However, no perspective from persons living with dementia or quantitative information was included. A hospital-based cohort from Italy noted that patients with COVID-19 infection with a history of dementia were more likely to die, and often presented with hypoactive delirium (Bianchetti et al., 2020). A quantitative survey study of community dwelling persons with mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia in Spain reported overall good mental health (Goodman et al., 2020). However, that study used a quantitative survey without open-ended questions, did not include care partners, and was limited to persons with mild dementia. In contrast, this study elicited many serious concerns particularly among care partners of persons with more moderate to severe dementia.

We identified multiple impacts on well-being of people living with dementia and their family members and/or care partners. Though most participants understood the need for social distancing, they found it difficult both physically and emotionally. Meaningful activity and social engagement are vital to the well-being and functioning of families of persons living with dementia (Phinney, 2006; Phinney et al., 2007; Roach & Drummond, 2014; Roach et al., 2016). Care partners expressed concerns that cognitive decline accelerated during social distancing. This is consistent with literature finding that loneliness can be detrimental to well-being and quality of life (Moyle et al., 2011) and increase the risk of mortality and morbidity (Luo et al., 2012; Tilvis et al., 2012). Social interaction can be beneficial for cognitive functioning (Vernooij-Dassen & Jeon, 2016) and so it is plausible that social isolation could provoke accelerated cognitive decline and or an exacerbation of neuropsychiatric symptoms of dementia.

The adverse impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health is increasingly recognized (Armitage & Nellums, 2020; Holmes et al., 2020). These mental health impacts may be compounded when care partners no longer have access to formal and informal supports that provide respite, help with hygiene, medication, day to day activities of living, and essential tasks such as shopping for groceries or collecting medications. Moreover, the challenges of assisting a person living with dementia to navigate changing public spaces where physical distancing, wearing of masks, and controlled movements are necessary leads to additional stress for the care partner and greater risk for the person living with dementia.

Participants were understanding of these measures but at the same time expressed concern for their own ability to continue to cope on a long-term basis, and the possibility of burnout without these supports. This echoes general concern of burnout by families living with dementia in times before the COVID-19 pandemic (Brodaty & Donkin, 2009; Sörenson & Conwell, 2011; Takai et al., 2009), but with these caring demands now amplified by isolation and anxiety. With the accompanying sudden shift to virtual care by almost all health care teams there was additional anxiety experienced with regards to the availability of care and how to access it.

Many of the stresses and anxieties identified in this study could potentially be mitigated through health system innovations. Remote support for social interaction for people living with dementia and care partners should be explored. There is evidence that tablet based interventions can benefit cognition and self-perceived quality of life for people living with dementia (Hung et al., 2020; Kong, 2020) and ongoing work is being made with integrating social robots into the care of people with dementia in the community (Hung et al., 2019; Korchut, 2017). Rapid implementation of these innovative technological solutions may provide one strategy to increase social interaction and improve well-being in times of pandemic public health restrictions. Additional evidence is needed to demonstrate what kind of interaction may be valuable for these approaches, and what types support may be most facilitative of a protective effect for cognition (Kim et al., 2015).

Other possible remote support for people living with dementia and families include virtual social networking, including virtual dementia cafes or day programming moving to online interaction (Hung & Mann, 2020). Where this is not possible, telephone check-ins may also prove to be a valuable source of support for the mental health and needs assessment for families. The more problematic question remains focused on remote approaches to care partner respite, which is difficult to navigate during times of public health restrictions. Possible solutions for home care or social care workers may include scheduled home care visits incorporating walks where the formal care provider and person living with dementia maintain an appropriate social distance; meal or medication collection and delivery at a safe distance or with the appropriate personal protective equipment, and flexibility on maximum limits for dispensing medications to the reduce the number of needed trips to the pharmacy.

Delivering high quality telemedicine will be essential to ensuring good health during a time of social distancing. It was evident in the data that if patients and care partners are expected to connect with internet technology, clear guidance should be provided to explain how to set up and use technology that may be unfamiliar to many. The ability for a care partner to provide confidential information to a clinical care team in advance of a scheduled virtual appointment was also expressed, particularly when the care partner wished to notify the medical team of symptoms that are potentially distressing or humiliating to the patient, or could lead to conflict. To address this need, our clinic is implementing secure web-based surveys that will allow the care partner to confidentially report neurobehavioural symptoms, function, and caregiver burden, using validated scales, with separate telemedicine appointments with the care partner as necessary. This work leverages data systems employed to capture patient data in the PROMPT registry, demonstrating another use of clinical patient registries for meaningful patient engagement and service improvement. Previous work has shown that neurological and psychiatric patient populations do not see registry participation as burdensome, but as an altruistic way to contribute to research that may or may not also provide personal benefit (Lee et al., 2019). Enhancing communication and preparation for clinic appointments has been shown to improve health outcomes in non-pandemic times (Entwisthle & Watt, 2006; Street et al., 2009) and we can reasonably extrapolate that this would be true during times of social and physical distancing, as experienced during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Strengths and Limitations

Strengths of the study include that it was embedded in a prospective clinic registry which enabled us to quickly contact people living with dementia and their care partners during the COVID-19 pandemic, and link their data to physician collected information on cognitive assessment and disease diagnosis. The main limitation is that the study was conducted in a single setting, a specialty outpatient dementia clinic, in an urban location with universal healthcare. It may not be wholly applicable to persons receiving care in family practices or with limited access to care. In future work we will also work to include more people living with dementia in the interviews, and perhaps the necessity of remote interviewing in this study presented a barrier to communication. However, the themes that emerged from our work accord with the concerns expressed by multiple advocacy groups, expert opinion (Brown et al., 2020), and the early observations of dementia specialists in Wuhan province (Wang et al., 2020); therefore, we expect that most of the themes are universal and not idiosyncratic to our practice setting. By design, we did not include persons living with dementia who are residing in care homes or who are hospitalized in acute care; additional research is needed on these important populations. This work is limited to the impacts of the initial public health response to the COVID-19 pandemic, and it will be useful to continue additional qualitative work to better understand the impact on different groups over time as the public health response evolves and society adapts to the changes.

Clinical Implications

This in-depth understanding of the lived impact of decreased social engagement and healthcare access on personal well-being can inform future health and social policy and health service provision. This knowledge may be useful for future pandemics (including the possibility of a resurgence of COVID-19 in the fall); extreme weather phenomenon; outbreaks of other disease or isolation in supportive living or long term care facilities; or other emergencies where social distancing/isolation/virtual care may be required. The reported increase in neuropsychiatric symptoms is also important for treatment planning and support in times of social distancing. Improved and innovate approaches to remote care and virtual medicine, including flexible mental and social supports for families, and the ability to provide information to clinical care teams prior to remote medical appointments has the potential to facilitate high-quality patient care that meets the needs of families and patients.

Funding

This work is supported by an award from the University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine COVID Rapid Response Clinical Research Fund (Grant number: CRF-COVID-202003). Direct and in-kind funding was also provided by the Brain and Mental Health Research Clinics, a part of Hotchkiss Brain Institute (https://brainandmentalhealthclinics.ca/).