Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY EVALUATION OF THE PROTECTION AND ISOLATION SYSTEM FOR PATIENTS WITH COVID-19

View ORCID ProfileClaudio Almeida Quadros, Maria Carolina Bezerra Di Medeiros Leal, Almeida Baptista Sobrinho Carlos de, Carolina Kymie Vasques Nonaka, Bruno Solano de Freitas Souza, Juliana Cristina Milan-Mattos, Aparecida Maria Catai, Valéria Amorim Pires Di Lorenzo, Antonio Gilberto Ferreira
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.04.20122838
Claudio Almeida Quadros
1University of Bahia State, Department of Life Sciences, Medical School.
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Claudio Almeida Quadros
  • For correspondence: caquadros{at}uneb.br
Maria Carolina Bezerra Di Medeiros Leal
2São Carlos Federal University, Department of Chemistry.
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Almeida Baptista Sobrinho Carlos de
3University Center of Planalto Central Aparecido dos Santos.
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carolina Kymie Vasques Nonaka
4Center for Biotechnology and Cell Therapy, São Rafael Hospital.
5D’Or Institute for Research and Education.
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bruno Solano de Freitas Souza
4Center for Biotechnology and Cell Therapy, São Rafael Hospital.
5D’Or Institute for Research and Education.
6Gonçalo Moniz Instituto, FIOCRUZ
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Juliana Cristina Milan-Mattos
7São Carlos Federal University, Department of Physiotherapy.
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Aparecida Maria Catai
7São Carlos Federal University, Department of Physiotherapy.
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Valéria Amorim Pires Di Lorenzo
7São Carlos Federal University, Department of Physiotherapy.
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Antonio Gilberto Ferreira
2São Carlos Federal University, Department of Chemistry.
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background SARS-CoV-2 has high transmissibility through respiratory droplets and aerosol, making COVID-19 a worldwide pandemic. In its severe form, patients progress to respiratory failure. Non-invasive mechanical ventilation restrictions and early orotracheal intubation have collapsed health systems due to insufficient intensive care unit beds and mechanical ventilators. COVID-19 dedicated healthcare professionals have high infection rates. This publication describes experimental testing of the Protection and Isolation System for Patients with COVID-19 (PISP/COVID-19).

Method PISP/COVID-19 is a disposable transparent polyethylene plastic that covers the patient’s entire hospital bed, with its internal air aspirated by the hospital’s vacuum system attached to a microparticle filter. Experiments validated PISP/COVID-19’s ability to block aerosolized microparticles dissemination. Caffeine was used as a molecular marker, with leakage evaluation through sensors analysis using nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. The biological marker was synthetic SARS-CoV-2 RNA, using Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) as the detection method.

Results PISP/COVID-19 was effective against molecular and biological markers environmental dispersion in simulations of non-invasive ventilation, high-flow nasal cannula oxygen and mechanical ventilation isolation. Caffeine was not detected in any of the sensors positioned at points outside the PISP/COVID-19. The ability of PISP/COVID-19 to retain virus particles and protect the surrounding environment was confirmed by detection and gradients quantification of synthetic SARS-CoV-2 RNA by RT-PCR.

Conclusion PISP/COVID-19 was effective in the retention of the molecular and biological markers in all tested simulations. Considering the current pandemic, PISP/COVID-19 might increase the use of non-invasive ventilation, high-flow nasal cannula oxygen and provide additional protection to healthcare professionals.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

Funding was obtained from the Sao Carlos Federal University, Department of Chemistry, Sao Paulo and the Center for Biotechnology and Cell Therapy, Sao Rafael Hospital, Salvador, Bahia. Both institutions in Brazil.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

It is an experimental study, with no humans or animals participation.

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data regarding molecular marker analysis with nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and biological (synthetic SARS-CoV-2 RNA) evaluation using Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) are available at any time.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted June 07, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY EVALUATION OF THE PROTECTION AND ISOLATION SYSTEM FOR PATIENTS WITH COVID-19
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY EVALUATION OF THE PROTECTION AND ISOLATION SYSTEM FOR PATIENTS WITH COVID-19
Claudio Almeida Quadros, Maria Carolina Bezerra Di Medeiros Leal, Almeida Baptista Sobrinho Carlos de, Carolina Kymie Vasques Nonaka, Bruno Solano de Freitas Souza, Juliana Cristina Milan-Mattos, Aparecida Maria Catai, Valéria Amorim Pires Di Lorenzo, Antonio Gilberto Ferreira
medRxiv 2020.06.04.20122838; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.04.20122838
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY EVALUATION OF THE PROTECTION AND ISOLATION SYSTEM FOR PATIENTS WITH COVID-19
Claudio Almeida Quadros, Maria Carolina Bezerra Di Medeiros Leal, Almeida Baptista Sobrinho Carlos de, Carolina Kymie Vasques Nonaka, Bruno Solano de Freitas Souza, Juliana Cristina Milan-Mattos, Aparecida Maria Catai, Valéria Amorim Pires Di Lorenzo, Antonio Gilberto Ferreira
medRxiv 2020.06.04.20122838; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.04.20122838

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Occupational and Environmental Health
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)