Abstract
Background The management of hypoxic respiratory failure due to COVID-19 is not currently subject to consensus. International and national guidance has favoured early intubation, with concerns persisting over the use of CPAP. However, considering available evidence and local circumstances, early ward based CPAP and self proning was adopted in our institution. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this approach.
Methods In this retrospective observational study we included all patients admitted with a positive COVID-19 PCR. Negative patients were also included where clinical suspicion remained high. A large number of simple CPAP machines were used with entrained oxygen. Ward staff were supported in their use by physiotherapists and an intensive critical care outreach program. CPAP was initiated early via protocol, with the aim of preventing rather than responding to deterioration. Data was analysed descriptively.
Results 559 patients admitted prior to 1/May/20 were included. 29.5% received CPAP, 7.2% were admitted to ICU and 4.8% were ventilated. Hospital mortality was 33.3%, ICU mortality 54.5%. Following CPAP, 64% of patients with moderate or severe ARDS at presentation, who were candidates for escalation, avoided intubation during their stay.
Conclusion Figures for ICU admission, intubation and overall hospital mortality are significantly lower than those reported in a large and relevant comparator database, whilst ICU mortality is similar. This is despite our population having high levels of co-morbidity and ethnicities associated with poor outcomes. We advocate this approach as both effective and safe.
Social media summary The use of early CPAP and proning in COVID-19 was associated with lower ICU admissions, intubation, and mortality at Bradford compared to a large UK cohort (ISARIC WHO CCP-UK).
Competing Interest Statement
TL is involved in the development of an open source CPAP device for use in low-income countries under an EPSRC grant (no funding received). RJ reports grants from Abbott Electro-physiology Research Fund, outside the submitted work. KW, AC, LM, MM, EN have nothing to disclose.
Funding Statement
No funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
NHS Health Research Authority & Bradford Teaching Hospitals Director of Research
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
