ABSTRACT
Background We investigated the extent to which Brazilian and Portuguese MSM had casual sexual relations outside their homes during the period of sheltering in place for the COVID-19 pandemic.
Methods An online survey was implemented in Brazil and Portugal in April, during the period of social isolation for COVID-19, with a sample of 2,361 MSMs. Recruitment was done through meeting apps and Facebook.
Results Most of the sample (53.0%; considering 53.1% in Portugal and 53% in Brazil) had casual sex partners during sheltering. Factors that increased the odds of engaging in casual sex in Brazil were having group sex (aOR 2.1, 95%CI 1.3-3.4), living in a urban area (aOR 1.6, 95%CI 1.1-2.2), feeling that sheltering had high impact on daily life (aOR 3.0, 95%CI 1.1-8.3), having casual instead of steady partners (aOR 2.5, 95%CI 1.8-3.5), and not decreasing the number of partners (aOR 6.5, 95%CI 4.2-10.0). In Portugal, the odds of engaging in casual sex increased with using Facebook to find partners (aOR 4.6, 95%CI 3.0-7.2), not decreasing the number of partners (aOR 3.8, 95%CI 2.9-5.9), usually finding partners in physical venues (pre-COVID-19) (aOR 5.4, 95%CI 3.2-8.9), feeling that the isolation had high impact on daily life (aOR 3.0, 95%CI 1.3-6.7), and HIV-positive serostatus (aOR 11.7, 95%CI 4.7-29.2). Taking PrEP/Truvada to prevent COVID-19 was reported by 12.7% of MSM.
Conclusions The pandemic has not stopped most of our MSM sample from finding sexual partners, with high risk sexual behaviors continuing. Public health messages for the prevention of COVID-19 need to be crafted to explicitly address sexual behavior to reduce contamination in the current moment.
Short Summary The pandemic of COVID-19 did not cause changes in the sexual behavior of MSM; they continued to engage in casual sex, using drugs, having multiple partners and adopting ineffective protective measures for COVID-19.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa - CNPq, Brazil.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The initial research project obtained ethical approval, and due to the addition of questions, a erratum was submitted to Ethical commission.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Funding: Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa – CNPq, Brazil.
Conflict of Interest: All authors declare no conflict of interest.
In this version, the methods were expanded and the results clarified. Information was added to table 02 and a flow chart was added.
Data Availability
Available upon request to authors.
