ABSTRACT
Objective Detection of delirium in hospitalised older adults is recommended in national and international guidelines. The 4 ‘A’s Test (4AT) is a short (<2 min) instrument for delirium detection that is used internationally as a standard tool in clinical practice. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy of the 4AT for delirium detection.
Methods We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, clinicaltrials.gov and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, from 2011 (year of 4AT release on the website www.the4AT.com) until 21 December 2019. Inclusion criteria were: older adults (≥ 65y); diagnostic accuracy study of the 4AT index test when compared to delirium reference standard (standard diagnostic criteria or validated tool). Methodological quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. Pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity were generated from a bivariate random effects model.
Results 17 studies (3702 observations) were included. Settings were acute medicine, surgery, a care home, and the emergency department. Three studies assessed performance of the 4AT in stroke. The overall prevalence of delirium was 24.2% (95% CI 17.8-32.1%; range 10.5-61.9%). The pooled sensitivity was 0.88 (95% CI 0.80-0.93) and the pooled specificity was 0.88 (95% CI 0.82-0.92). Excluding the stroke studies, the pooled sensitivity was 0.86 (95% CI 0.77-0.92) and the pooled specificity was 0.89 (95% CI 0.83-0.93). The methodological quality of studies varied but was moderate to good overall.
Conclusions The 4AT shows good diagnostic test accuracy for delirium in the 17 available studies. These findings support its use in routine clinical practice in delirium detection.
PROSPERO Registration number CRD42019133702.
Key points
The 4AT is a short delirium assessment tool that is widely used internationally in clinical practice.
This systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies of the 4AT included 3702 observations in 17 studies from nine countries.
Studies recruited from a range of settings including the Emergency Department, and medical, stroke, and surgical wards.
The 4AT had a pooled sensitivity of 0.88 and pooled specificity of 0.88.
The methodological quality of studies varied but was moderate to good overall.
Competing Interest Statement
AMJM led the design of the 4AT in 2011 (with others, see www.the4AT.com); note that 4AT is free to download and use. SDS and AA provided comments on its development.
Clinical Protocols
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=133702
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the Wellcome Trust-University of Edinburgh Institutional Strategic Support Fund. Grant no. IS3-T06/03.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical review was not required for this review of existing peer reviewed literature.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Declaration of sources of funding This work was supported by the Wellcome Trust-University of Edinburgh Institutional Strategic Support Fund. Grant no. IS3-T06/03.
Conflict of Interest AMJM led the design of the 4AT in 2011 (with others, see www.the4AT.com); note that the 4AT is free to download and use. SDS and AA provided comments on its development.
Data Availability
All relevant data are provided within the paper.
List of abbreviations
- 3D-CAM
- 3-Minute Diagnostic Assessment for Delirium using the Confusion Assessment Method algorithm
- 4AT
- 4 ‘A’s Test
- bCAM
- brief Confusion Assessment Method
- CAM-ICU
- Confusion Assessment Method-Intensive Care Unit
- CAM
- Confusion Assessment Method
- DRS-R98
- Delirium Rating Scale-Revised 98
- DSM
- Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
- IQCODE
- Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly
- MMSE
- Mini-Mental Status Examination
- NICE
- National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence
- PRISMA-DTA
- Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies
- QUADAS-2
- Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-Version 2
- SIGN
- Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network
- STARD
- Standards for Reporting Diagnostic accuracy studies
