Abstract
Monoclonal gammopathies have been associated with kidney injury. Nephrotoxicity of the secreted monoclonal (M)-protein relies on a complex interplay between biological characteristics and serum concentration. Little is known about the epidemiology and clinical manifestations of the different types of monoclonal gammopathies in patients with kidney disease.
We enrolled all patients with monoclonal gammopathy who underwent kidney biopsy between January 2000 and March 2017. Data about demographics, clinical manifestations and histological lesions were collected retrospectively.
Monoclonal gammopathy was detected in 174 (13%) patients with a mean age of 66.4±13.1 years. M-protein was secreted by monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significate (MGUS) (52,8%), myeloma multiple (MM) (25.2%), primary amyloidosis (AL) (9,1%), smoldering MM (7 %), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) (6.8%) and HL (1.7%). Monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance (MGRS) accounted for 6.5% in patients with MGUS and 14.2% in patients with smoldering MM. Evaluation of kidney biopsy revealed that M-protein was directed involved in causing kidney injury in MM (93.1%) and NHL (8,3%). MM was the only gammopathy significantly associated with an increased risk of kidney injury (odds ratio [OR]=47.5, CI95%, 13.7-164.9; P=<0.001). While there were no significant differences in the progression toward end-stage renal disease or dialysis (P=0.776), these disorders were associated with a different risk of death (P=0.047) at the end of the follow-up.
Monoclonal gammopathy was a frequent finding in patients with kidney disease. Kidney biopsy had a key role in identifying the underlying monoclonal gammopathy and recognizing the causal relationship between M-protein and kidney injury.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Not funded
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical Committee of Emilia Romagna approved this study (89/2016/OSS*/AOUMO)
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Available upon valid request