Abstract
Valid and reliable life-course and cross-cohort comparisons of psychological distress are limited by differences in measures used. We aimed to examine adulthood distribution of symptoms and cross-cohort trends by scale-equating psychological distress measures administered in the 1946, 1958 and 1970 British birth cohorts. We used data from these three birth cohorts (N=32,242) and an independently recruited calibration sample (n=5,800) to inform the scale-equating. We used two approaches to scale-equating (equipercentile linking and multiple imputation) and two index-measures (General Health Questionnaire [GHQ]-12 and Malaise-9) to compare means, distributions and prevalence of distress across adulthood. While we consistently observed an inverse U-shape of distress across adulthood, we also observed measure and method differences in point estimates, particularly for cross-cohort comparisons. Sensitivity analysis suggested that multiple imputation yielded more accurate estimates than equipercentile linking. Though we observed an inverse-U shaped trajectory of psychological distress across adulthood, differences in point estimates between measures and methods did not allow for clear conclusions regarding between-cohort trends.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The authors would like to acknowledge the Medical Research Council for ongoing funding of the 1946 birth cohort, and the Economic and Social Research Council for ongoing funding of the 1958 and 1970 cohorts. This particular project was funded by a grant from the Economic and Social Research Council (Grant number: ES/T00116X/1).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
All procedures involving human subjects were approved by the UCL Institute of Education Research Ethics Committee (REC1210).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data from the 1946 birth cohort is available to bona fide researchers upon request to the NSHD Data Sharing Committee via a standard application procedure. Further details can be found at: http://www.nshd.mrc.ac.uk/data. doi: 10.5522/NSHD/Q101; doi: 10.5522/NSHD/Q102; doi: 10.5522/NSHD/Q103. Data from the 1958 birth cohort is publicly available via the UK Data Service via https://beta.ukdataservice.ac.uk/datacatalogue/series/series?id=2000032#!/abstract. Data from the 1970 birth cohort is publicly available from the UK Data Service via https://beta.ukdataservice.ac.uk/datacatalogue/series/series?id=200001. Data from the calibration sample will be made publicly available via the UK Data Service as soon as possible.
http://www.nshd.mrc.ac.uk/data
https://beta.ukdataservice.ac.uk/datacatalogue/series/series?id=2000032#!/abstract
https://beta.ukdataservice.ac.uk/datacatalogue/series/series?id=200001
