Abstract
E-learning has been widely used in higher education as it provides better access to learning resources online, utilising technology – regardless of learners’ geographical locations and timescale – to enhance learning. Despite growing evidence claiming that e-learning is as effective as traditional means of learning, there is very limited evidence. This protocol aims to assess the effects of e-learning factors that impact on health sciences education (HSE). We will conduct a systematic review meta-analysis research of both randomised controlled trials and non-randomised controlled trials. Seven databases – MEDLINE, EMBASE, Allied & Complementary Medicine, DH-DATA, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Global Health – will be searched, from 1980 through 2020. The PRISMA-P checklist will be used while preparing this protocol. Two reviewers will independently screen the papers and extract data. We will utilise the JBI quality appraisal tools for quantitative and qualitative studies, and Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool appraisal tools to assess the quality. A narrative synthesis, using thematic analysis, will be conducted for the included studies. If sufficient data are available, the random-effects model for meta-analysis will be performed to measure the effect size of e-learning on health sciences education or the strengths of relationships. The outcome of this review will provide a useful checklist of potential factors to develop an e-learning approach in HSE. This might provide a basis for developing the best methods of e-learning in education so that e-learning policy in education and learning settings in the HSE context could be administered effectively, efficiently and equitably.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This research received no external funding.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical approval - Not applicable
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Not applicable
