Abstract
Objective To estimate the prevalence of ocular manifestations and ocular samples polymerase chain reaction (PCR) positivity among COVID-19 patients.
Methods A systematic literature review was performed using search engines (PubMed, Google Scholar, Medrixv and BioRixv) with keywords “SARS-CoV-2”, “novel coronavirus”, “COVID-19”, “ocular manifestations”, “conjunctival congestion”, “Ocular detection”, “Polymerase chain reaction”, and “conjunctivitis”. The measure of heterogeneity was evaluated with the I2 statistic. The pooled proportion of patients presenting with symptoms and ocular samples PCR positivity was estimated.
Results A total of 20 studies (14 studies and 6 case-reports) were included in the systematic review and 14 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled prevalence of conjunctivitis was 5.17% (95% CI: 2.90-8.04). Conjunctivitis was reported as an initial symptom of the disease in 0.858 % (95% CI: 0.31-1.67). Common associated features include itching, chemosis, epiphora. Seven patients (29 %) with conjunctivitis showed positive results in ocular samples, whereas 13 patients (54%) showed positive only in their nasopharyngeal samples (NPs) or sputum samples and 4 patients (16 %) were negative for both NPs and Sputum as well as ocular samples. The pooled prevalence of ocular PCR positivity was 2.90 % (95% CI: 1.77 – 4.46) vs. NPs 89.8% (95% CI: 78.80-79.0).
Conclusion The prevalence of conjunctivitis and ocular samples PCR positivity among COVID-19 patients was low indicating that the eye is a less affected organ. However, conjunctivitis may present as the first symptom of the disease making the patient seek medical care at the earliest.
Synopsis Viral conjunctivitis was the only symptom reported. The prevalence of conjunctivitis and ocular samples polymerase chain reaction positivity among COVID-19 patients was low indicating the eye is a less effected organ.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
No funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This is a systematic review
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
This is a systematic review and Meta-analysis.
