Abstract
Introduction Healthcare workers’ (HCWs) preparedness to respond to pandemics is critical to containing disease spread. Low-resource countries, however, experience barriers to preparedness due to limited resources. In Ghana, a country with a constrained healthcare system and high COVID-19 cases, we examined HCWs’ perceived preparedness to respond to COVID-19 and associated factors.
Methods 472 HCWs completed questions in a cross-sectional self-administered online survey. Perceived preparedness was assessed using a 15-question scale (Cronbach alpha=0.91) and summative scores were created (range=0-45). Higher scores meant greater perceived preparedness. We used linear regression with robust standard errors to examine associations between perceived preparedness and potential predictors.
Results The average preparedness score was 24 (SD=8.9); 27.8% of HCWs felt prepared. In multivariate analysis, factors associated with higher perceived preparedness were: training (β=3.35, 95%CI: to 4.69); having adequate PPE (β=2.27, 95%CI: 0.26 to 4.29), an isolation ward (β=2.74, 95%CI: 1.15 to 4.33), and protocols for screening (β=2.76, 95%CI: 0.95 to 4.58); and good perceived communication from management (β=5.37, 95%CI: 4.03 to 7.90). When added to the model, perceived knowledge decreased the effect of training by 28.0%, although training remained significant, suggesting a partial mediating role. Perceived knowledge was associated with a 6-point increase in perceived preparedness score (β=6.04, 95%CI: 4.19 to 7.90).
Conclusion HCWs reported low perceived preparedness to respond to COVID-19. Training, clear protocols, PPE availability, isolation wards, and communication play an important role in increasing preparedness. Government stakeholders must institute necessary interventions to increase HCWs’ preparedness to respond to the ongoing pandemic and prepare for future pandemics.
Strengths and limitations of this study
This is one of the few studies globally to empirically examine Healthcare workers’ (HCWs) perceived preparedness to respond to COVID-19, and the first study to do so among HCWs in Ghana and in Africa.
We developed a perceived preparedness for COVID-19 scale and conducted psychometric analysis to confirm its validity and reliability; this scale can facilitate similar research in other settings.
We show that providers have low perceived preparedness to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic, and that this is associated with a lack of training on COVID-19, PPE, clear protocols, and isolation wards, as well as poor communication from management.
The use of an online survey with recruitment via social media may have accounted for a relatively young sample.
Findings are based on self-reported data from a cross-sectional survey, thus, there may be social desirability bias and associations described are not causal.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The University of California, San Francisco COVID-19 Related Rapid Research Pilot Initiative.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical approval was obtained from the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) and the Navrongo Health Research Centre (NHRC).
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Study data are available on request. All relevant data are included in the article or enclosed as supplementary information.
